Creative Innovation Exercises

This teacher helped her students see their future selves. There is great power in that. Research shows we tend to see our future selves as strangers rather than as who we'll become. But something profound happens, when you connect with your Future Self. When MIT researchers created an AI simulation - 'Future You' - letting people talk to their future selves, they noticed significant psychological shifts: ✅ People began to make bolder decisions today. ✅ They stopped questioning their worth. ✅ They built careers based on purpose, not just praise. According to Dr. Hal Hershfield's research, when we connect with our future selves, we make choices that honor our long-term vision - not just immediate demands. When we don't? ➡️ We sacrifice opportunities for comfort. ➡️ We say yes to everything except our own growth. ➡️ We delay the choices that would align with our deeper purpose. Here are 5 ways to begin connecting with your Future Self: 1/ Create Your Future Leadership Vision ↳ Stop asking: "What should I do next?" ↳ Start asking: "Who am I becoming as a leader?" ↳ Envision not just titles, but the impact you wish to make 2/ Write Letters From Your Future Self ↳ What boundaries would she tell you to set now? ↳ What skills would she want you to prioritize? ↳ What relationships would she tell you to nurture? 3/ Make Decisions Through Your Future Lens ↳ Stop making choices from urgency. ↳ Start filtering through your future wisdom. ↳ Before any major decision, ask: "What would my wisest future self advise?" 4/ Practice Future Self Meditation ↳ Set aside 5 minutes daily to connect with your future self. ↳ Breathe into the leader you're becoming. ↳ Feel the continuity between who you are and who you'll be. 5/ Create a "Future Leader" Board ↳ Collect images, quotes, and stories that represent your future self. ↳ Review it before high-stakes meetings. ↳ Let it guide your present choices when self-doubt appears. When you begin anchoring your identity in your Future Self: You stop waiting to be chosen. You start making conscious choices. You stop dimming your vision. You start embodying it today. This is what conscious leadership makes possible: Clear decisions that honor both your present capacity and future vision. Which of these practices would be most powerful for where you are in your leadership journey right now? I'd love to hear in the comments. 📚 Explore this concept more in my book - The Conscious Choice ♻ Repost if this resonated. 🔔 Follow Bhavna Toor for more insights on leading with purpose

If you’re tired of team exercises that feel forced, try the Start / Stop / Continue ritual that actually builds team bonding. Here’s how to do it: Step 1: Pick a topic Choose one specific area you want to improve. You can do this as a team (like marketing strategy, branding, or workflow) or even as a couple or family (like health habits or household routines). When my team did this for our marketing strategy, we asked: “What’s working? What’s not? What should we try next?” Step 2: Sticky it up Give everyone a stack of sticky notes. Each person writes down every task they do related to that topic (one per note). Then, color-code: • Different colors for different people (for transparency) • Or all one color if you want to keep feedback anonymous This part alone often surprises people. We realize how many invisible tasks we’re doing, and how much effort goes unnoticed. Step 3: Place the tasks Draw three columns on the board: 🟢 Start – New ideas or things worth trying 🔴 Stop – Tasks that drain time or add no real value 🟡 Continue – What’s working and worth doubling down on Then, together, sort each sticky. When we did this at Science of People, we learned: • We wanted to start experimenting with Medium and LinkedIn posts • We needed to stop wasting time on low-return platforms (sorry, X) • And we should continue doing more of what was driving real results (YouTube, email newsletters, and blog writing) If you disagree on something (like we did about Medium), place it in between columns as a trial. Set a test period. For example, “Let’s try this for 2 months and then review.” Step 4: Create a safe space This is a critical step. Start / Stop / Continue only works when feedback feels safe. You’re talking about the task, not the person. We even use different colored stickies to separate ideas from ownership. That way, no one feels attacked. When people feel psychologically safe, they share the truth, and that’s when real improvement happens. Step 5: Assign and act Insight without action is just decoration. So before you finish, assign ownership: • Who’s starting the new tasks? • Who’s stopping or phasing out the old ones? And for the “Continue” column, ask: “Can we make this even better?” A bonus: It works outside of work, too I even do this exercise with my husband once a year, for our health and habits. We’ve listed things like: • Start: Morning protein shakes, evening routines • Stop: Buying soda, eating out too often •Continue: Yoga and weekend soccer We walk away feeling more connected and intentional. The takeaway: When you pause to ask, “What should we start, stop, and continue?” you give yourself (and your team) permission to refocus energy where it truly matters.

If you jump straight to solutions, your problem will be back in 6 months. Guaranteed.  Happened to me at Vavo repeatedly until I found this framework: Most of us approach problems backward. We see a challenge and immediately start brainstorming solutions. We get excited about the first idea that sounds good and start executing. But here's what I've realized: when you're struggling to find the right solution, you're probably not struggling with the solution at all. You're struggling because you don't fully understand the problem. Here's a simple example: Let's say your business revenue dropped last month. Most people would immediately think: "We need more leads" or "We need better marketing." But if you stop and actually understand the problem first, are existing clients buying less? Are fewer prospects converting? Is the sales cycle longer? Are competitors taking market share? Once you map out what's really happening, the solution becomes obvious.  Maybe it's not more leads you need, but better follow-up with existing prospects. The framework is this simple: Instead of asking "How do I solve this?" ask "What exactly am I trying to solve?" Instead of rushing to solutions, spend time understanding the context. What are the real constraints? What's actually causing this issue? What does success really look like? When you truly understand a problem - when you've mapped out all the constraints and seen the full picture - the right solution becomes obvious. This applies whether you're choosing a career path, fixing a business issue, making hiring decisions, or figuring out your next step in life. Stop solving. Start understanding.

The 𝐏𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐑𝐨𝐨𝐦 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 (𝐏𝐑𝐨𝐅) teaching case shows how a large healthcare consortium and a small group of manufacturers collaborated to rethink innovation in a highly regulated sector. At its core, the case demonstrates how PRoF turned the interaction between two very different communities into its main innovation engine. The large consortium represents the healthcare user community: nurses, doctors, caregivers, patients, and hospital managers who express the lived reality of care. Their contribution is experiential and value-based. Through structured “brainwave sessions,” they surface latent needs and convert them into broad keywords such as comfort, privacy, dignity, or anti-loneliness. These keywords form a shared language that avoids technical jargon and allows hundreds of users with diverse perspectives to converge around common priorities. The small consortium consists of manufacturers, architects, and designers who have the capabilities to transform these user insights into concrete room concepts. Their commercial goals are kept strictly outside the creative process, allowing trust to grow between the groups. Once the user community defines the keywords, the producer community develops prototypes, after which the large consortium returns to evaluate and refine them. This modular sequencing keeps tensions low, ensures rapid progress, and prevents commercial logic from dominating user needs. The interaction between these two communities solves a longstanding problem in healthcare innovation: suppliers often misunderstand user needs, while users lack the means to innovate. PRoF bridges this gap by letting users drive ideation and letting producers translate that insight into solutions. What emerges is a genuinely user-oriented innovation ecosystem in which neither community could succeed alone, but together they generate concepts that reshape expectations of care design. You can find the case study at HBSP: https://lnkd.in/e6nxTFM7 #UserCentricInnovation #Collaboration #OpenInnovation #CrossCommunityCollaboration #HealthcareEcosystems #CoCreation #Ideation

Constraint is the mother of innovation! It’s easy to assume innovation comes from abundance. From deep pockets. From having it all. Big companies with big R&D budgets. Major brands with their elite creative agencies. That's would make sense, right? Ironically, it's actually the opposite. True innovation thrives in constraints. It's born in the corners where resources are tight. When you can't match your competitor's wallet, you better outmatch their creativity. Limited resources force clever solutions.  They demand ingenious workarounds. They spark unconventional thinking. Look at Google's early days. Memory constraints forced them to build a search engine that ran on less than 8MB. Why? Because they needed to work on 90% of computers back then. That constraint? It pushed them to create something that would change how we access information forever. Or take Airbnb during the 2008 crash. No funding? No problem. The founders got creative - selling presidential candidate themed cereal boxes. That scrappy move kept them alive and caught media attention. IKEA's iconic identity was born from a constraint. Shipping costs were killing them. Their solution? Flat-pack furniture. A limitation transformed into an innovation that changed an industry. When you can't match your competitor's wallet, you'd better outmatch their ingenuity. Can't outspend? You navigate uncharted waters. You take calculated risks. You write new rulebooks. I've worked with hundreds of companies. The well-funded ones? Often the least innovative. At cocreatd, we encourage our founders to embrace constraints. Having less means creating more!

Teams often implement solutions that do not fix the problem they were trying to address. That's because the issue wasn’t framed correctly in the first place. This is especially true in complex or unfamiliar situations, where quick conclusions feel comforting but are often wrong. When I work with teams on decision-making, I turn to a framework developed by Julia Binder and Michael Watkins. Their E5 approach helps leaders define the right problem before trying to solve it. Phase 1: EXPAND Suspend early judgments and deliberately broaden how the challenge is understood. By exploring multiple interpretations of the issue, teams uncover hidden assumptions, surface blind spots, and create the conditions for more original thinking before jumping to answers. Phase 2: EXAMINE Shift from scope to depth. Teams analyze the problem rigorously, moving beyond visible symptoms to identify behavioral patterns, structural drivers, and underlying beliefs that reveal what is truly at play. Phase 3: EMPATHIZE Center on the perspectives of those most affected by the issue. Through (real) listening and reflection, teams gain insight into stakeholders’ motivations, emotions, concerns, and behaviors, often uncovering needs that data alone cannot reveal. Phase 4: ELEVATE Step back to see how it fits within the broader organization. Viewing the challenge through lenses such as structure, people, power, and culture exposes interdependencies and systemic tensions that shape outcomes. Phase 5: ENVISION Articulate a clear future state and map a path to reach it. Working backward from a shared definition of success, teams prioritize initiatives, sequence efforts, and align resources to move from understanding to execution. I've found that when leaders take the time to frame problems well, they increase the likelihood that those solutions will actually matter. #decisionMaking #leadership #perspective #learning #problems Source: The model is described in more details in this Harvard Business Review article: https://lnkd.in/gAeBb5uT

Transforming How We Think About Collaboration: The 'Collaborative Innovation' Approach 🪄 🎯 𝗕𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝘂𝗱𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗚𝗼𝗮𝗹𝘀 Instead of seeking lowest-common-denominator agreement, start with a powerful vision that attracts committed changemakers. 👥 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 Rather than "open door" meetings, carefully select participants to ensure the whole system is in the room — from grassroots to grasstops. 🔄 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹-𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗖𝗼-𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 Move away from "develop-then-present" to working together in real-time, leveraging collective intelligence. ⚡️ 𝗘𝗺𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 Stop pushing for false harmony and start using differences as catalysts for innovation. ✨ 𝗘𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗼𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗴 & 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 Build the strategy through action rather than endless planning sessions. What's powerful about this approach is how it transforms resistance and diversity into sources of innovation. It's not about getting everyone to agree — it's about weaving different perspectives into transformative interventions. Insights from Russ Gaskin, CoCreative and Ashoka's Leading Multi-stakeholder Collaborations course💡 🤔 How do you navigate the tension between inclusion and focused action in your collaborative work? #SystemicChange #Collaboration #Innovation #Leadership #CollectiveImpact

Sometimes, finding a compelling problem instantly inspires possibilities. Other times, crickets. Rather than waiting around for lightning to strike, we recommend that teams take a more proactive approach, and deliberately provoke their own imaginations. One of the most effective, powerful, and fun tools we have created for such self-provocation missions is what we call “Analogous Exploration.” Building upon the extensive research demonstrating the power of unexpected new combinations, we encourage folks to seek radically unexpected sources of inspiration to provoke their thinking. This means not only leaving the room, and not only leaving the building, but also leaving the industry and the conventional definition of “competitor set” behind. Analogous Exploration is not benchmarking. One early application of this radical tool was with a struggling Semiconductor Company whose sales organization had been refined over time to cater predominantly to its largest customers (who ordered hundreds of millions of units annually). The company’s senior leaders felt they needed to “reinvent the customer experience for smaller customers,” and asked for our help. (Story too long for LinkedIn tldr: they instituted a radical new information-sharing agreement with their largest distribution partner, which they believe is one of the largest supply chain innovations in their industry in the last 50 years.) The COO of the company jokingly confided later that they had been watching the competition closely… but the competition didn’t know how to solve their problems either! By deliberately seeking out unexpected sources of inspiration, the organization was able to jump-start revolutionary innovations that serve the smaller businesses every bit as well as they already did the large customers. Getting out of the box like this will not feel efficient. But it is effective. We have since seen Australian financial services organizations glean insights for how to establish trust with new customers from a barber shops & tattoo parlor (those are fascinating stories), Israeli tech companies learn from farmers’ markets, New Zealand fisheries take notes from prominent tea purveyors and bespoke coffee shops, and Japanese conglomerates attracting top-tier millennial talent based on insights from a rock climbing studio and a belly dancing instructor. Despite their differences, one critical commonality among each of these environments is that the teams positioned to solve the newly-defined problem lacked the requisite inputs to trigger fresh ideas. Imagination is fueled by fresh input, and yet all too often, teams are stuck in a conference room, post-it pads in hand, banging their heads against an all-too-ironically spotless whiteboard. Analogous Exploration is a tool to help folks get out of their context on purpose, with intention, to come back with the inspiration they need to fuel fresh thinking.

My team has stopped asking questions. They now wait for instructions. A leader shared this observation at last Thursday’s Melbourne Business School - Retail & Consumer Goods panel. It perfectly captured the curiosity crisis facing our industry in an uncertain operating environment. In a brilliant conversation with Adam Murphy ��� , moderated by Lenny Chudri, GAICD, we explored how to reignite innovation when uncertainty is our new normal. Here is what resonated most: 1. The 5-Question Rule That Changed Everything At a global FMCG giant, we were stuck. Innovation had become theatre, all talk, no breakthrough. So we tried something radical: “Curiosity Time”. Rule: For one hour every Friday, you could ONLY ask questions. No answers. No solutions. Just questions. The first session was painful. By week six? We had identified three breakthrough opportunities worth $5M. 🎯Try this tomorrow: Start your next meeting with 5 minutes of questions only. No answers allowed. 2. When Budget Cuts Forced Our Best Innovation Leading innovation at a major CPG company, I faced a 30% budget cut. Instead of scaling back, we asked: “What would we do if we had 10% of the budget?” That constraint forced us to partner with suppliers in ways we never imagined. We reduced a 12-18month innovation cycles to 3 months. The result? Our most successful launches that decade. Key insight: Every constraint hides an opportunity. 🎯 List your top 3 constraints right now. Pick one. Ask “How might this force us to be brilliant?” 3. The $8M Mistake That Taught Me Everything Years ago, I led a “perfect” innovation project. Great consumer research. Flawless execution. It failed spectacularly. Why? We had curiosity at the top but killed it everywhere else. Only 24% of employees feel curious at work, yet curiosity increases creativity by 34%. That gap is your innovation problem. At my next role: We measured “learning velocity” alongside EBIT. We celebrated fast failures publicly. We made questioning as important as delivering. 🎯 Your move: Ask your teams: “What are we pretending not to know?” Then actually listen. After commercialising 1,200+ innovations globally, from establishing industry-first research hubs, I know this: Curiosity is not a nice to have. It is your sustainable competitive advantage. Sharing this handy question. ❓If your biggest competitor had your constraints but twice your curiosity, what would they do differently? Some 📸 from an inspiring evening of #learning and #unlearning. Lenny Chudri, GAICD Adam Murphy 🌻 Innovation Gamechangers University of Melbourne Melbourne Business School #curiosity #innovation

Operational bottlenecks are often mistaken for minor distractions. In textiles, challenges such as machine downtime, dye-house delays, working capital spikes, or capacity mismatches between spinning and weaving are not just inconveniences. They are critical leverage points for value creation and significant professional impact. Many leaders focus on optimising every area. However, sustainable throughput comes from identifying and rigorously managing the single constraint that governs the entire system. We apply the Theory of Constraints (TOC) at RSWM to convert operational friction into performance gains. TOC shows that local efficiency can be misleading. Keeping every department busy often creates excess work-in-progress, disrupting flow, increasing costs, and delaying deliveries. Instead, we follow a disciplined process: -First, identify what sets the pace of the value chain. This may include machinery misaligned with current market needs or process challenges like low Right First Time (RFT) rates in the dye house that reduce effective capacity. -Second, exploit the constraint by precise scheduling, strengthening discipline, and improving efficiency to extract more output without immediate capital deployment. -Third, align the rest of the organisation to the bottleneck’s pace to ensure smooth material flow across departments. Fourth, elevate the constraint through capital investment or process redesign, addressing capacity mismatches or refining product lines. -Finally, repeat the cycle, since the constraint shifts as performance improves. This approach has delivered tangible results at RSWM. Addressing dye-house bottlenecks increased throughput, reduced working capital requirements, and improved EBITDA. However, constraints change over time. Market shifts, such as China’s shift from a major yarn importer to an exporter, or recent U.S. tariffs affecting demand, can pose new challenges. In response, we adapt by exploring alternative markets, leveraging domestic opportunities, or innovating products to sustain growth. Our goal is to eliminate internal friction so operational excellence drives expansion. When the market is the only constraint, the organisation is positioned to thrive. #TheoryOfConstraints #OperationalExcellence #Textiles #Leadership #RSWM