Insurance and Climate Change

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Natalie Kyriacou OAM
    Natalie Kyriacou OAM Natalie Kyriacou OAM is an Influencer

    Author | Environmentalist | Board Director | Australian Top Innovator | Advisor | Charity Founder | LinkedIn Top Voice

    25,035 followers

    You may not believe in climate change (despite scientific consensus), but your insurance provider sure does. Günther Thallinger of Allianz puts it plainly: if global temperatures rise by 3°C (which is where we’re currently headed) the insurance industry will collapse. “The financial sector as we know it ceases to function. And with it, capitalism as we know it ceases to be viable.” Extreme heat and climate-driven disasters have killed and displaced millions across the globe. This isn’t normal. These events are becoming more unpredictable, more intense and more deadly. Climate change and the destruction of nature are combining to create the perfect storm, fuelling disasters while stripping away our capacity to endure them. Right now, in fact, you are likely reading about a fresh disaster that is ‘unprecedented’. And the financial fallout is mounting. Global insured losses from natural (climate) disasters have averaged about US$100 billion over the past five years (Moody's). And insurance providers are hiking up premiums or, as was the case in California, refusing to issue new home insurance policies due to climate disaster (see State Farm and Allstate). As Günther says, "Heat and water destroy capital. Flooded homes lose value. Overheated cities become uninhabitable. Entire asset classes are degrading in real time." The risk of climate change, he says, has historically been managed by the insurance industry. But we are fast approaching temperature levels "where insurers will no longer be able to offer coverage for many of these risks." Insurers don’t deal in opinion, they deal in data. And the data is clear: climate change and nature decline aren’t up for debate; they’re a reality that you are witnessing. Whether or not you buy the science, the financial consequences are impossible to ignore. Your premiums have already noticed. Thankfully, we already have many of the tools and solutions to address climate change and the destruction of nature. What we don't have? Consistent political will. For Australians wanting to make a difference ahead of the election, Biodiversity Council has created a simple tool to help you contact your local political candidates and call for stronger environmental action: https://lnkd.in/ghAxEv2y They have also identified the key actions we need the next government to take to safeguard and restore the environment: https://lnkd.in/g62uCTfd See Günther Thallinger's post: https://lnkd.in/gahhv6MK See the report by Moody's: https://lnkd.in/ggE_2VCa See the article by The Guardian: https://lnkd.in/gpGBXCRZ

  • View profile for David Carlin
    David Carlin David Carlin is an Influencer

    Turning climate complexity into competitive advantage for financial institutions | Future Perfect methodology | Ex-UNEP FI Head of Risk | Open to keynote speaking

    181,480 followers

    🚨 A big UN report just launched: A powerful global resource for insurers, reinsurers & brokers navigating the net-zero transition. “Underwriting the Transition” is the first-ever guide specifically tailored to help insurance and reinsurance companies develop and disclose credible transition plans for their underwriting portfolios. Why it matters: While insurers have made climate commitments, clear frameworks for underwriting strategies have been lacking. This guide provides that. What’s inside: - A structured framework for transition planning - A checklist to assess credibility - Real-world examples from insurers, reinsurers & brokers - Practical insights on disclosure, strategy, and implementation By moving from ambition to action, this report helps the insurance sector lead the way in building a resilient, inclusive, and net-zero economy reaffirming its role as society’s risk manager. 🌍 This is the second deliverable in United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI)'s FIT Transition Plan Project — following “Closing the Gap” launched at COP29 and it lays the groundwork for the next report on total balance sheet guidance linking underwriting and investment strategies, to be launched at COP30. Let's make COP30 a defining moment for insurance climate leadership. #TransitionPlan #Insurance #Reinsurance #Sustainability #NetZero #FIT #UNEP #EIOPA #JustTransition #Underwriting

  • View profile for Scott Kelly

    Senior Vice President | Chief Economist | Adjunct Associate Professor | Board Advisor | Systems Stretegist

    22,959 followers

    𝗜𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸 — 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹. Natural disasters caused $𝟯𝟲𝟴 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 in global economic losses last year, according to Aon — the ninth year in a row losses topped $300 billion. Only 𝟰𝟬% of those losses were insured. The protection gap is widening. As insurers retreat from high-risk regions, public safety nets — often overstretched — are stepping in. More households, businesses, and governments are being left to absorb risks they cannot afford. This isn’t just about insurance anymore. When insurance breaks down, so does credit. When credit dries up, property values fall, costs rise, and resilience weakens — just when it’s needed most. @Günther Thallinger 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘇 put it starkly: “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘴. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘬.” The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) project a 𝟱𝟬% 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹 𝗚𝗗𝗣 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲𝘀 if climate risk is not properly managed. Climate risk is no longer a future scenario. It is here. It is compounding. And it is reshaping our economy in real time. There are positive signs: ➤ Hannover Re and Swiss Re are restricting fossil fuel underwriting. ➤ Parametric insurance models are speeding up disaster recovery. ➤ EIOPA and the European Central Bank are pushing for public-private risk sharing. These are encouraging — but early signs. 𝗠𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲: Climate risk is already disrupting the systems we rely on: insurance, credit, asset valuation, and public finances. Systems change is needed. The insurance sector holds a unique vantage point — but leadership now demands rethinking long-held assumptions about risk, resilience, and responsibility. The sector has an opportunity to lead: ➤ Embed forward-looking climate risk into underwriting ➤ Signal future exposures more transparently ➤ Drive transition finance to accelerate decarbonisation ➤ Redirect investment into adaptation ➤ Co-design shared risk pools and resilience bonds Collaboration between insurers, financiers, and governments is no longer optional — it is the foundation for economic stability in a climate-disrupted world. The sooner we align risk pricing with physical reality, the stronger our chances of building a more resilient economy for the future. #climaterisk #insurance #resilience #finance #sustainability #systemicrisk #adaptation –––––––––– For updates on sustainability, climate, and innovation, follow me on LinkedIn: @Scott Kelly

  • View profile for Roberta Boscolo
    Roberta Boscolo Roberta Boscolo is an Influencer

    Climate & Energy Leader at WMO | Earthshot Prize Advisor | Board Member | Climate Risks & Energy Transition Expert

    170,655 followers

    👉 Are we using the wrong tools to assess climate risk? A new expert-led assessment, drawing on the judgment of 60+ climate scientists, says that #climatechange introduces forms of risk that exceed the design assumptions of existing economic and financial frameworks. Here’s what that means in practice ⬇️ 🔹 Climate damages are structural, they reshape economies: where people live, what can be produced, how infrastructure functions, and which regions remain viable. 🔹 Extremes drive real-world risk: what actually destabilises societies and markets are heatwaves, floods, droughts, grid failures, food shocks. It’s the tails of the distribution that matter. 🔹 GDP misses mortality, inequality, displacement, ecosystem loss, and can even rise after disasters due to reconstruction. This creates a dangerous illusion of resilience. 🔹 Repeated shocks erode recovery capacity and propagate across supply chains, finance, migration, and geopolitics. 🔹 Beyond ~2°C, uncertainty widens sharply. Confidence in precise damage estimates falls even as consequences grow. 🔹 Tipping points expose the limits of economic modelling: At higher warming levels, model outputs can appear precise while resting on assumptions that no longer hold. At the same time, many models also underestimate positive tipping points in clean energy and innovation. The goal is to build resilience under deep uncertainty. For treasuries, central banks, regulators, and long-horizon investors, this means recalibrating governance toward: ➡️ precaution ➡️ robustness ➡️ transparency Because avoiding irreversible outcomes is always cheaper than trying to price them after the fact. read the report "Recalibrating Climate Risk" here 👇 https://lnkd.in/dx8wmRZ4 Green Futures Solutions (University of Exeter) Carbon Tracker @aurora trust

  • View profile for Antonio Vizcaya Abdo

    Sustainability & ESG Transformation Strategist | Reporting, Governance & Organizational Integration | Professor UNAM | Advisor | TEDx Speaker

    123,850 followers

    Business Risks from Climate Change 🌎 Businesses today face increasing exposure to climate-related risks that can disrupt operations, damage assets, and impact long-term viability. These risks are no longer hypothetical—they are material, measurable, and growing in relevance across all sectors. According to the TCFD, climate risks fall into two main categories: physical risks and transition risks. Physical risks include both acute events, such as storms and floods, and chronic impacts like water scarcity or rising temperatures. Transition risks emerge from the shift to a low-carbon economy and include regulatory changes, shifts in market demand, and pressure to invest in new technologies. Extreme weather events, supply chain interruptions, and damage to infrastructure are some of the key physical risks. These can lead to increased operational costs, reduced productivity, and disruptions in raw material availability. Transition risks are equally important. Carbon pricing, energy cost volatility, and investor scrutiny are reshaping business models. Companies that delay adaptation may face stranded assets, higher insurance costs, and reduced access to capital. Addressing these risks requires more than isolated sustainability initiatives. It demands integration into core business strategy, risk management, and investment planning. Short-term actions can have long-term implications. Clear priorities include assessing exposure, upgrading infrastructure for resilience, and embedding climate risk into existing governance and risk processes. These actions support both operational continuity and regulatory preparedness. Developing low-carbon strategies and enhancing disclosure practices aligned with standards like the TCFD are also essential steps. Transparent reporting builds trust with investors, regulators, and other stakeholders. Climate risk is business risk. Managing it effectively is no longer optional—it is fundamental to long-term value creation and competitiveness. #sustainability #sustainable #business #esg #climatechange #risks

  • View profile for Frédéric de Courtois

    Board Member and Advisor

    28,533 followers

    The scale of change is huge! Beyond predicting natural catastrophes, we are now able to anticipate and measure their specific impacts on people and infrastructure. All of this is unpacked in “New Tech for Nat Cat” report by AXA Research Fund, now part of AXA Foundation for Human Progress. It explores case studies from academics supported by AXA and experts from the public and private sectors, how remote sensing and AI are boosting a shift toward proactive prevention. Climate change has made the frequency and intensity of extreme events a global issue and ushered in a new era of #insurance. At AXA, we are fully committed to driving this transformation, collaborating with leading scientists to redefine protection, shifting from reaction to prevention, from risk to resilience. Today, AXA Digital Commercial Platform (DCP) combine satellite data, AI, and risk management and enable us to turn knowledge into actionable intelligence at scale. For years, we have moved beyond paying claims (“from payers to partners”), now we map impacts in real time, empower communities to prepare and adapt, and drive smarter prevention at every stage. We are convinced that innovative technologies will help keep the world insurable. Discover how in “New Tech for Nat Cat”: https://lnkd.in/eSfSKz7q

  • View profile for Hans Stegeman
    Hans Stegeman Hans Stegeman is an Influencer

    Chief Economist, Triodos Bank | Columnist | PhD Transforming Economics for Sustainability

    73,950 followers

    𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸𝘀 A new report (👉https://lnkd.in/eMsCKQuh) exposes a fundamental gap between what climate scientists expect and what economic models predict. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺: 68 climate scientists from 12 countries were surveyed about economic damage estimates. Their insights differ radically from standard models: 🔴 At 3°C warming, experts estimate median GDP damage at ~35%. The Nordhaus DICE model predicts only ~3% 🔴 36% of scientists place the "collapse threshold" 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘸 4°C, while many scenarios model up to 4°C and beyond 🔴 250 million people displaced by climate disasters in the past decade, impacts barely visible in GDP figures 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘄𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴: We focus on global averages, but people experience 𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘴: the 2021 Texas storm caused $195 billion damage while barely registering in global temperature statistics. GDP often 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘴 after disasters (reconstruction spending) while real wealth declines – the "disaster industrial complex" accounts for 1/3 of US economic activity at 1.4°C warming Models assume smooth damage curves but ignore tipping points, cascades, and system failures 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀: This gap determines how pension funds assess risks and how central banks conduct stress tests. The NGFS recently raised damage estimates from 7-14% to 30% GDP loss at 3°C, but climate scientists say even this underestimates. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲: Research ( 👉 https://lnkd.in/eVsBapbT) shows "disciplinary asymmetries": economists seek optimization within existing systems; natural scientists see limits and tipping points. Where economists use GDP as proxy, scientists see missed impacts on health, ecosystems, and inequality. As a consequence, environmental scientist see degrowth as an option, while economist favour market based solutions 👇 . 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄: The report calls for "recalibration toward precaution, robustness, and transparency": ✓ Report ranges instead of point estimates ✓ Acknowledge where models fail (especially above 2-3°C) ✓ Integrate metrics beyond GDP: mortality, inequality, ecosystem degradation ✓ Model cascades and second-order effects The crucial insight: climate change introduces risks exceeding existing economic frameworks. The response is not waiting for perfect models, but recognizing that avoiding irreversible outcomes is cheaper than pricing them after the fact. For long-term investors: climate risk cannot be fully diversified away. It's a systemic risk requiring fundamentally different strategies. #climaterisk #climateeconomics #systemchange #financialrisk #sustainablefinance

  • View profile for Ulrike Decoene
    Ulrike Decoene Ulrike Decoene is an Influencer

    Group Chief Communications, Brand & Sustainability Officer - Member of the Management Committee @AXA ☐ ORRAA (Chair) ☐ Entreprises & Medias (President)☐ The Geneva Association ☐ Financial Alliance for Women ☐ Arpamed

    21,508 followers

    I am happy to co-author this article with Beatrice WEDER DI MAURO, President of the CEPR - Centre for Economic Policy Research, reflecting on the urgent need to engage in collective thinking and action to adapt our response to the challenge of insurability in the face of escalating climate risks. This article, which captures key convictions from our joint workshop hosted at Collège de France by the AXA Research Fund and CEPR - Centre for Economic Policy Research, couldn't have been more timely.   Devastating floods in Valencia, the wildfires in Los Angeles, the typhoons in Mayotte and La Réunion... These recent climate catastrophes show a clear reality: climate risks are intensifying and the protection gap for local communities and economies are becoming evident. Global economic losses from extreme weather events reached $320 billion in 2024, while in Europe, only 25% of economic losses were insured - leaving individuals, businesses, and communities vulnerable.    To address this, we need to enhance risk-sharing mechanisms and promote partnerships between public institutions and private companies.   Ensuring insurance accessibility and effectiveness is crucial. This can be done through: ➡️ Hybrid models, combining market mechanisms with public-private partnerships, to help ensure broad coverage and affordability. France’s CatNat regime and Switzerland’s hybrid model offer valuable insights. These models can be adapted to regions facing extreme exposure, such as sea level risks. ➡️ Greater investment in prevention and risk-sharing mechanisms. Initiatives like local municipal risk assessments can help small municipalities assess and mitigate local climate risks. ➡️ Impact underwriting, where insurers incentivize policyholders to adopt risk-reducing measures in exchange for lower premiums. ➡️ Public education on climate risks and stronger coordination between insurers, governments, and consumers to ensure preventive measures are taken seriously.   As we move forward, it's clear that policymakers, insurers, and society must work together to strike a sustainable balance between affordability and fiscal viability. This is not just about who pays the bill. It is about how we manage risk in an increasingly uncertain climate landscape. Let's continue to foster collaboration and innovation to close the protection gap and build a resilient future. 👇 https://lnkd.in/er6BkrtZ

  • View profile for Alexey Navolokin

    FOLLOW ME for breaking tech news & content • helping usher in tech 2.0 • at AMD for a reason w/ purpose • LinkedIn persona •

    776,363 followers

    AI and technology have the potential to play a significant role in addressing climate change. What do you think? Here are some ways in which AI and technology can help manage the impacts of climate change: Monitoring and Prediction: * Satellite Imaging: AI-powered analysis of satellite images can track deforestation, monitor changes in land use, and assess the health of ecosystems. * Climate Modeling: Advanced AI algorithms can improve the accuracy of climate models, allowing for better predictions of future climate patterns and extreme weather events. * Early Warning Systems: AI-driven systems can analyze vast amounts of data to provide early warnings of natural disasters like floods, droughts, and wildfires, allowing for timely evacuations and preparedness measures. Mitigation: * Renewable Energy Optimization: AI can optimize the operation of renewable energy systems like solar and wind farms, maximizing their efficiency and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. * Energy Efficiency: AI-powered smart grids can optimize energy distribution, reduce energy consumption, and identify inefficiencies in energy systems. * Carbon Capture and Storage: AI can help develop more efficient and cost-effective methods for capturing and storing carbon dioxide emissions. * Sustainable Agriculture: AI can optimize agricultural practices, reducing the use of water, fertilizers, and pesticides, and improving crop yields. Adaptation: * Urban Planning: AI can help design cities that are more resilient to climate change, optimizing infrastructure and land use to minimize the impact of extreme weather events. * Water Management: AI can optimize water distribution and usage, helping to manage water scarcity and prevent water shortages. * Disaster Response: AI can aid in disaster response efforts by analyzing data to identify areas most affected and coordinating relief efforts. Challenges and Considerations: * Data Quality and Accessibility: AI models rely on high-quality and accurate data, which can be challenging to obtain, especially in developing countries. * Ethical Considerations: AI systems must be developed and used ethically, ensuring that they do not exacerbate existing inequalities or create new ones. * Infrastructure and Expertise: Implementing AI solutions requires significant investment in infrastructure and the development of skilled AI professionals. While AI and technology offer promising solutions to address climate change, it is important to recognize that they are not a silver bullet. A comprehensive approach that combines technological solutions with policy changes, behavioral changes, and international cooperation is essential to effectively address this global challenge. #Ai #Technology via @tiatavee #Innovation

  • View profile for Nadia Vanderhall
    Nadia Vanderhall Nadia Vanderhall is an Influencer

    Making Money Make Sense — For Real People & Real Workplaces | Financial Planner & Financial Educator | ERG & Corporate Financial Wellness | LinkedIn Top Voice | WaPo • GMA • WSJ | Booking: Speaking, Brands & Consulting

    9,771 followers

    40% of wildfire insurance claims are underpaid—what does that mean for LA wildfire victims? Imagine losing everything, only to find out your insurance payout won’t even cover the cost to rebuild. For many wildfire survivors, this is the harsh reality. On average, homeowners only get 72% of what they’re legally entitled to, leaving a gap of $200K-$300K to rebuild their lives. It’s not just the money—it’s the painstaking back-and-forth with insurers, the stress of providing documentation that may have literally turned to ash, and the realization that your policy might not stretch far enough. From price increases of coverage by lobbying to non-renewals to configuring emergency funds - it’s tough now. If you’re dealing with this right now, here are some steps to take to protect yourself and maximize your recovery:
- Know Your policy Inside-Out: Ask your insurer to break down exactly what’s covered—and what isn’t. Push back on vague answers. Look at your declaration page to know what’s covered and ask questions. 
- Get everything in writing: Phone calls are fine for quick updates, but always follow up with an email to create a paper trail.
-Don’t rush to settle: Insurers may try to pressure you into a quick payout. Take your time to review and, if necessary, bring in a claims advocate or attorney to fight for what you’re owed. Insurance claims and coverage has been interesting to say the least. It’s good to know your options. If you’re waiting and need help now, here are other options to explore: * Tap your 401(k): If you’re in a federally declared disaster area, you may qualify for penalty-free withdrawals. This can help with immediate costs while you work on rebuilding. Just keep in mind you’ll owe income tax unless you pay it back within three years. * Banks & creditors: Many have disaster relief programs—ask about deferred payments or waived fees. Know your terms and conditions. * Utility relief: Some companies offer temporary assistance to keep your lights on or your water running. * Mortgage help: Forbearance or deferral programs could give you breathing room while you recover. Most of us don’t have tens of thousands of dollars ready to go when disaster strikes. And that’s okay—what matters is knowing your resources and how to use them. Preparation isn’t about perfection; it’s about knowing where to turn when things go sideways. #personalfinance #insurance #californiawildfires

Explore categories