Shaping Quantum Technology Strategy

5 Essential Steps to Prepare Your Business for the Quantum Era The quantum computing revolution is approaching faster than many expect, and businesses that fail to prepare could face disruptions in cybersecurity, data processing, and competitive advantage. Quantum computers are transitioning from research labs to real-world applications, meaning organizations must take proactive steps to adapt. Here are five critical actions businesses should take in 2025 to prepare for the quantum era. 1. Stay Ahead of the Quantum Curve Quantum computing is evolving rapidly, and the gap between theory and real-world application is shrinking. Businesses should: • Monitor advancements in quantum research and emerging industry use cases. • Partner with tech leaders like IBM, Google, and Microsoft, which are actively developing quantum technologies. • Train employees on quantum concepts to build internal expertise early. 2. Assess Quantum Cybersecurity Risks One of the biggest threats posed by quantum computing is its ability to break classical encryption methods. Businesses should: • Conduct risk assessments on sensitive data and encryption strategies. • Begin transitioning to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) to protect against future attacks. • Follow security guidelines from NIST and cybersecurity agencies developing quantum-resistant encryption. 3. Identify Quantum Use Cases in Your Industry Quantum computing will revolutionize optimization, AI, materials science, and financial modeling. Companies should: • Evaluate how quantum algorithms could improve operations, from logistics optimization to drug discovery. • Explore hybrid computing models, integrating quantum and classical processing for better efficiency. • Experiment with quantum cloud services from providers like AWS Braket or Microsoft Azure Quantum. 4. Build Strategic Partnerships Few companies will develop quantum expertise in-house, so collaborations are key. Businesses should: • Partner with quantum startups, universities, and government initiatives. • Invest in R&D consortia to stay ahead of quantum innovations. • Work with regulators and industry groups shaping quantum computing policies. 5. Prepare for Business Model Disruption Quantum computing will challenge traditional business models. Companies should: • Reevaluate data-intensive processes that may be disrupted by quantum speedups. • Identify new opportunities for competitive differentiation using quantum-driven insights. • Adapt investment strategies, as quantum computing could shift market dynamics in industries like finance, logistics, and healthcare. Final Thoughts The quantum era is coming, and businesses that start planning today will avoid security risks, leverage new capabilities, and stay ahead of the competition. While full-scale quantum computing is still developing, organizations that take early action will have a significant advantage in this next technological revolution.

This image is from an Amazon Braket slide deck that just did the rounds of all the Deep Tech conferences I've been at recently (this one from Eric Kessler). It's more profound than it might seem. As technical leaders, we're constantly evaluating how emerging technologies will reshape our computational strategies. Quantum computing is prominent in these discussions, but clarity on its practical integration is... emerging. It's becoming clear however that the path forward isn't about quantum versus classical, but how quantum and classical work together. This will be a core theme for the year ahead. As someone now on the implementation partner side of this work, and getting the chance to work on specific implementations of quantum-classical hybrid workloads, I think of it this way: Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) are specialised engines capable of tackling calculations that are currently intractable for even the largest supercomputers. That's the "quantum 101" explanation you've heard over and over. However, missing from that usual story, is that they require significant classical infrastructure for: - Control and calibration - Data preparation and readout - Error mitigation and correction frameworks - Executing the parts of algorithms not suited for quantum speedup Therefore, the near-to-medium term future involves integrating QPUs as accelerators within a broader classical computing environment. Much like GPUs accelerate specific AI/graphics tasks alongside CPUs, QPUs are a promising resource to accelerate specific quantum-suited operations within larger applications. What does this mean for technical decision-makers? Focus on Integration: Strategic planning should center on identifying how and where quantum capabilities can be integrated into existing or future HPC workflows, not on replacing them entirely. Identify Target Problems: The key is pinpointing high-value business or research problems where the unique capabilities of quantum computation could provide a substantial advantage. Prepare for Hybrid Architectures: Consider architectures and software platforms designed explicitly to manage these complex hybrid workflows efficiently. PS: Some companies like Quantum Brilliance are focused on this space from the hardware side from the outset, working with Pawsey Supercomputing Research Centre and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. On the software side there's the likes of Q-CTRL, Classiq Technologies, Haiqu and Strangeworks all tackling the challenge of managing actual workloads (with different levels of abstraction). Speaking to these teams will give you a good feel for topic and approaches. Get to it. #QuantumComputing #HybridComputing #HPC

𝗝𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝟮𝗻𝗱 : 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲’𝘀 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 The European Commission will present its #quantum and #supercomputing #strategy on 𝗝𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝟮. That's earlier than originally planned (Q3 2025). That kind of acceleration is rare in Brussels. It reflects a subtle but important shift: urgency. What’s changed is not the state of the science, but the tone of the industry. In recent months, companies like IonQ, IBM, and Quantinuum have made increasingly 𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗳𝗮𝘂𝗹𝘁-𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀. IonQ now projects 12 logical qubits by 2026, and 800 by 2027. IBM and Quantinuum are signalling FTQC architectures in the thousands, paired with universal fault-tolerant gate sets. These projections are not yet supported by public technical demonstrations. The path from physical qubits to stable, usable logical ones is 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆, especially in fidelity, decoding speed, and integration at scale. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 even if the projections are premature, they are consequential. Capital is flowing. And the assumption, realistic or not, is that the 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘇𝗼𝗻, much closer than we think. This is the context in which 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲’𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 will be published. The document will be read closely not only for its content, but for what it reveals about Europe's position. Whether it chooses to 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲-𝘂𝗽, or remain focused on 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. Whether it engages with the 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘄𝘁𝗵 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴. And whether it recognises the 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 of those working toward fault-tolerant logical qubits. 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆, 𝗶𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗺𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝘆. The strategy on July 2 will show whether it intends to convert that foundation into systems, platforms, and deployment. #QuantumComputing #EUQuantumStrategy #LogicalQubits #FTQC #DeepTech #ScaleUpEurope #DigitalSovereignty

The global quantum computing race just shifted from theoretical physics to sovereign risk. If you sit on a Global 1000 board, direct national defense policy, or deploy tier-one capital, the era of quantum "hype" is officially over. Based on the latest 2025–2026 data, Israel has quietly engineered a highly coordinated "Two-Engine" quantum ecosystem designed for industrial integration and strategic resilience. Here is the executive snapshot of where the capital, the supply chain, and the geopolitics are colliding—and how boards must govern it: 🏗️ 1. The "Two-Engine" Architecture Israel is executing a ruthless, dual-pronged strategy: • Engine 1 (Sovereignty): Hyper-focused on defense superiority, post-quantum cryptography (PQC), and financial resilience. • Engine 2 (Market): Anchored by a massive concentration of multinational R&D centers securing the global supply chain. 💰 2. Strategic Capital Allocation Smart money is no longer trying to build the "race car" (the QPU); it is building the engine and the dashboard. • Public: The Israel National Quantum Initiative (INQI) is deploying a $390M budget. • Private: Capital is flooding the "enabling layers." Quantum Machines raised ~$280M to lead global control systems; Classiq secured massive Series C funding ($173M+) to dominate software synthesis. • Geopolitical: A proposed $200M US-Israel Quantum Fund is advancing for 2026–2030 to counter adversarial tech dominance. ⚓ 3. The Multi-National Anchors You cannot map this sovereign infrastructure without the silicon giants: • Nvidia: Driving the backbone of AI and quantum data center networking. • Intel: Leveraging its massive Kiryat Gat fabrication footprint. • AWS: Designing custom silicon that bleeds directly into quantum control logic. 🏦 4. The Regulatory Shockwave (Directive 364) In January 2025, the Bank of Israel issued Directive 364, requiring banks to map encryption dependencies and submit PQC preparedness plans within one year. This instantly shifted the industry from "theory" to mandatory board-level compliance. 🛡️ 5. The Governance Imperative: The GBAC QSI Overlay With tightening U.S. export controls, the goal is independent technological sovereignty. But how does a global enterprise govern this? Traditional frameworks (COSO, COBIT, ITIL) are failing at the quantum layer. To safely integrate these technologies, organizations must deploy the Quantum Strategic Intelligence (QSI) model. QSI acts as the overarching governance architecture—overlaying sovereign infrastructures like Israel’s—to protect the enterprise from the "Atom to the Algorithm." A question for my network: With central banks now mandating post-quantum preparedness plans, how is your board or agency mapping its cryptographic dependencies? Are you still relying on legacy models? Let's discuss below. 👇 Aviad Tamir, Nir Minerbi, Asif Sinay #QuantumComputing #CorporateGovernance #NationalSecurity #DeepTech #TechStrategy #Geopolitics #PostQuantumCryptography #GBAC #QSI

⚜️Excited to announce the forthcoming publication by Columbia Law School of my article "Towards a European Quantum Act," in the Columbia Journal of European Law. This ex-ante study provides a complete blueprint for the EU's foundational 2026 quantum legislation, addressing the technology's transformative promise and significant dual-use risks. ✒️It argues for a sui generis legal framework, as quantum phenomena like entanglement and superposition defy the classical assumptions of certainty, causality, and locality that underpin our current laws—a challenge illustrated with concrete examples from healthcare, finance, cybersecurity and defense. ⚛️While quantum applications are not yet mature, the very purpose of this anticipatory governance framework is to embed our values into the technology's architecture before a governance tipping point is reached and it becomes too entrenched to change, avoiding the reactive regulatory posture that has defined previous tech cycles. 📃Building on this research, my colleague Tracey Forrest and I at the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) have developed a policy brief to translate these findings into actionable strategy. We have shared it with key leaders at the European Commission, the US Senate, policy institutions, and International Standards bodies. 🇪🇺 Our core recommendation is for a two-pillar EU Quantum Act that combines an ambitious, Chips Act-style industrial and security policy with an agile, risk-based regulatory framework grounded in the precautionary principle. Central to this is the "standards-first" philosophy—a concept from the Stanford Center for Responsible Quantum Technology that I detailed with my co-authors in Science Magazine—which uses technical standards as the primary vehicle to embed democratic values. 🌍The ultimate goal is to foster a responsible and competitive quantum ecosystem that strengthens the transatlantic alliance. On the international stage, we advocate for a global non-proliferation framework for quantum and AI WMDs, culminating in a "Qubits for Peace" initiative to ensure this technology is developed safely and ethically for the benefit of all humanity. 💡You can read the policy brief here on the website of the European Commission: https://lnkd.in/gTrpCXSK 🗽The full 80-page Columbia Law paper is available in preprint on SSRN: https://lnkd.in/gYXZrkSu … and ArXiv: https://lnkd.in/gaSTgn7A 🎓Thank you to my colleagues at Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) and Stanford University for their support. cc: Mark Lemley Michael McFaul Urs Gasser Mateo Aboy I. Glenn Cohen #QuantumGovernance #QuantumTechnology #TechPolicy #Regulation #DualUse #NationalSecurity #ExportControls #AI #EU #Transatlantic #QubitsforPeace #Democracy #CIGI #StanfordRQT #ColumbiaLaw

Here's a thought-provoking idea: forward‑looking companies should appoint (or groom) a Chief Quantum Officer (CQO) already now - not after the quantum boom hits. The article acknowledges the current reality of quantum technologies, but argues that a CQO could start bringing value now, and better prepare the enterprise for the upcoming quantum revolution. In plain terms, a CQO's mandate could cover: • Set the quantum strategy & roadmap tied to business outcomes. • Run pilots and partnerships (hardware, software, academia) to find real advantage. • Build talent & literacy, so quantum isn’t trapped in an R&D silo. • Own post‑quantum security with the CISO: crypto inventory, PQC migration, “harvest‑now/decrypt‑later” risk. • Translate science to P&L, portfolio of bets, vendor‑agnostic, clear KPIs. In my view, a CQO will be essential for the next decade or three, then, as quantum commoditizes, the role will dissolve into the CTO/CIO/CISO stack. That’s a feature, not a bug. Read the full argument: https://lnkd.in/gnAkBqrw #QuantumComputing #PostQuantum #Quantum #QuantumTech #QuantumSensing #QuantumSimulation

As we enter the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology, we speak passionately—and rightly so—about the need to transcend borders and promote knowledge-sharing. While these principles hold immense value, we cannot overlook national security and intellectual property protection. As with most things, the answer is not black and white—it requires a delicate balance. The duty remains for us to: ⚇ promote open access to knowledge as a fundamental human right ⚇ focus on initiatives with societal impact, especially those aligned with the United Nations' SDGs ⚇ ensure preparedness by implementing security safeguards, such as those outlined by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) The Center for a New American Security (CNAS) report, written by Dr. Constanza M. Vidal Bustamante, Ph.D., lays out this challenge clearly. U.S. quantum leadership depends on balancing openness with security. The report calls for: ⚇ reauthorizing the National Quantum Initiative Act ⚇ accelerating quantum sensor deployment for national security ⚇ addressing export control gaps to safeguard IP from strategic competitors Yet, U.S. deep tech investment remains volatile. While new quantum funding is being proposed, other critical research areas—such as biomedical science—face budget cuts, as seen with the recent NIH funding reduction. However, the recently announced U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Quantum Leadership Act of 2025, though awaiting congressional approval, could help stabilize funding—if passed. Yet, the fate of this bill highlights a larger issue: without sustained legislative commitment, quantum investment remains at the mercy of political cycles. If passed, the bill would: ⚇ authorize $2.5 billion+ in quantum research funding over five years ⚇ expand DoE r&d programs through 2030 ⚇ address supply chain challenges ⚇ support workforce development ⚇ strengthen interagency coordination Zooming out, the real challenge isn’t just whether we invest in quantum—it’s how we build a cohesive, long-term strategy that: ⚇ promotes scientific discovery ⚇ develops talent ⚇ ensures research translates into real-world impact Without this, the U.S. risks short-term funding cycles that stifle innovation, rather than reinforcing technological leadership. The International Year of Quantum is a call to act with foresight. We must prioritize open-access initiatives that drive meaningful global impact, while proactively implementing security measures to move forward with preparedness, not just ambition. #QuantumTechnology #DeepTech #Innovation #Policy #OpenScience #NationalSecurity

𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗹��𝗮𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗿𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆’𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻’𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲. Quantum technologies are unlocking a new layer of resilience and foresight. From predicting logistics breakdowns to securing global trade routes, the frontier has shifted. Those who wait for “maturity” will be left managing legacy risks. The World Economic Forum's Report shows how quantum computing, sensing and communication are transforming the industrial core. Essential Takeaways for #CEOs, #CTOs, #PolicyLeaders, and #InnovationHeads & #Investors ✅Quantum is moving from labs to production floors. Early adopters are deploying quantum applications in materials science, logistics and energy systems with measurable ROI. ✅The new competitive edge lies in quantum readiness. Firms investing in infrastructure, partnerships, and talent now will own the standards of tomorrow’s industrial intelligence. ✅Value creation depends on convergence. Quantum only delivers impact when integrated with AI, IoT, and digital twins ✅Quantum supply chains are becoming predictive. From demand forecasting to dynamic risk mitigation, quantum optimization can turn uncertainty into advantage. ✅Manufacturing innovation will multiply. Quantum simulations enable the discovery of new materials, catalysts, and batteries that are lighter, stronger, and more sustainable. ✅Collaboration is non-negotiable. No single actor can scale quantum. Public-private alliances, open standards, and shared testbeds will define success. ✅Talent and governance are the real bottlenecks. The technology is advancing fast but skills, regulation,and trust frameworks lag behind. Aligning them is the next strategic frontier. ✅National ecosystems are the new power centers. Countries that build cross-sector quantum coalitions will shape the industrial policies and export advantages of the next decade. ✅Risk management must evolve. Quantum introduces new cybersecurity, IP, and supply risks. Resilience frameworks must adapt before the technology scales. ✅The winners will master orchestration, not ownership. Quantum success won’t come from hoarding IP but from integrating across value chains faster than competitors. 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘆 ►Manufacturing: Faster design, smarter materials, less waste. ►Supply Chains: Real-time visibility and risk anticipation. ►Energy & Mobility: Breakthroughs in batteries and grid efficiency. ►Healthcare: Molecule modeling that shrinks R&D from years to weeks. Bottom Line Nations investing now In Quantum will own the future of productivity. Behind every quantum breakthrough is a simple truth that smarter tech only matters when it strengthens how we build, connect and trust. Reflection Point What happens when your competitor’s supply chain sees the future and yours doesn’t? #QuantumComputing #AI #SupplyChain #Manufacturing #TechConvergence #Leadership #Innovation

Quantum computing is advancing rapidly, bringing unprecedented processing power that threatens traditional encryption methods. The "collect now, decrypt later" strategy underscores the urgency of preparation, adversaries are already harvesting encrypted data with the intent to decrypt it once large-scale quantum computers become viable. Fortinet is leading the way in quantum-safe security, integrating NIST PQC algorithms, including CRYSTALS-KYBER, into FortiOS to safeguard data from future quantum-based attacks. "A recent real-world demonstration by JPMorgan Chase (JPMC) showcased quantum-safe high-speed 100 Gbps site-to-site IPsec tunnels secured using QKD. The test was conducted between two JPMC data centers in Singapore, covering over 46 km of telecom fiber, and achieved 45 days of continuous operation." "The network leveraged QKD vendor ID Quantique for the quantum key exchange, Fortinet’s FortiGate 4201F for network encryption, and FortiTester for performance measurement." This is not just a theoretical concern, organizations are already deploying quantum-safe encryption solutions. As quantum computing capabilities advance, organizations must adopt quantum-resistant security architectures and take proactive steps now to safeguard their sensitive information against future quantum-enabled attacks. These proactive methods include: -adopting hybrid cryptographic approaches, combining classical and PQC algorithms, ensuring interoperability and a phased transition -implementing crypto-agile architectures, for seamless updates to encryption mechanisms as new quantum-resistant standards emerge -leveraging PQC capable HSMs and TPMs -evaluating network security architectures, such as ZTNA models -ensuring authentication and access controls are resistant to quantum threats. -identifying mission-critical and long-lived data, that must remain secure for decades. -implementing sensitivity-based classification, determine which datasets require the highest level of post-quantum protection. -conducting risk assessments to evaluate data exposure, storage locations, and current encryption standards. -transitioning to quantum-resistant encryption algorithms recommended by NIST’s PQC standardization efforts. -establishing data-at-rest and data-in-transit encryption policies, mandate use of PQC algorithms as they become available. -strengthening key management practices -developing GRC frameworks ensuring adherence to post-quantum security. -implementing continuous cryptographic monitoring to detect and phase out vulnerable encryption methods. -enforcing regulatory compliance by aligning with emerging PQC standards. -establishing incident response plans to handle quantum-driven cryptographic threats proactively. Fortinet remains committed to pioneering quantum-safe encryption solutions, enabling organizations to stay ahead of emerging cryptographic threats. Read more from Dr. Carl Windsor, Fortinet’s CISO!

I’ve started spending time around the quantum ecosystem in the Northwest. Not to understand the physics. To understand what it will take for quantum technologies to scale. The physics matters enormously. Whether it’s computing, sensing, networking, or security. Breakthroughs at the scientific layer are what make the entire category possible. Without that work, there is no industry. What I’m curious about are the layers around it. ==> Talent density — not just PhDs, but operators, engineers, product leaders, and technicians who can translate breakthroughs into usable systems. ==> Capital patience: funding models that align with long technical timelines and don’t force premature commercialization. ==> Industry collaboration: coordination across universities, startups, incumbents, and government before clear market winners emerge. ==> Institutional trust: the gradual confidence enterprises, regulators, and the public need before adopting technologies this complex. Earlier in my career, I had a front-row seat to a few infrastructure transitions. At Microsoft, we redesigned how enterprise customers bought across product portfolios. It changed what customers bought and used to grow their business, not how the products were made. At F5, I was part of the shift from hardware-centric products to cloud-delivered platforms. It opened new economic models and deployment options, not how we built security and/or load balancers. In both cases, the technology was real and the harder challenge was creating alignment to drive massive scale. Because technology maturity and institutional maturity moved at very different speeds. Quantum technologies feel destine for the same kind of dynamic. The science is advancing. The surrounding system is still forming. That’s the layer I’m interested in understanding better. #QuantumTechnology, #InnovationEcosystem, #TechnologyStrategy