Ensuring Data Quality For Scalable AI

Here are a few simple truths about Data Quality: 1. Data without quality isn't trustworthy 2. Data that isn't trustworthy, isn't useful 3. Data that isn't useful, is low ROI Investing in AI while the underlying data is low ROI will never yield high-value outcomes. Businesses must put an equal amount of time and effort into the quality of data as the development of the models themselves. Many people see data debt as another form of technical debt - it's worth it to move fast and break things after all. This couldn't be more wrong. Data debt is orders of magnitude WORSE than tech debt. Tech debt results in scalability issues, though the core function of the application is preserved. Data debt results in trust issues, when the underlying data no longer means what its users believe it means. Tech debt is a wall, but data debt is an infection. Once distrust drips in your data lake, everything it touches will be poisoned. The poison will work slowly at first and data teams might be able to manually keep up with hotfixes and filters layered on top of hastily written SQL. But over time, the spread of the poison will be so great and deep that it will be nearly impossible to trust any dataset at all. A single low-quality data set is enough to corrupt thousands of data models and tables downstream. The impact is exponential. My advice? Don't treat Data Quality as a nice to have, or something that you can afford to 'get around to' later. By the time you start thinking about governance, ownership, and scale it will already be too late and there won't be much you can do besides burning the system down and starting over. What seems manageable now becomes a disaster later on. The earliest you can get a handle on data quality, you should. If you even have a guess that the business may want to use the data for AI (or some other operational purpose) then you should begin thinking about the following: 1. What will the data be used for? 2. What are all the sources for the dataset? 3. Which sources can we control versus which can we not? 4. What are the expectations of the data? 5. How sure are we that those expectations will remain the same? 6. Who should be the owner of the data? 7. What does the data mean semantically? 8. If something about the data changes, how is that handled? 9. How do we preserve the history of changes to the data? 10. How do we revert to a previous version of the data/metadata? If you can affirmatively answer all 10 of those questions, you have a solid foundation of data quality for any dataset and a playbook for managing scale as the use case or intermediary data changes over time. Good luck! #dataengineering

You wouldn't cook a meal with rotten ingredients, right? Yet, businesses pump messy data into AI models daily— ..and wonder why their insights taste off. Without quality, even the most advanced systems churn unreliable insights. Let’s talk simple — how do we make sure our “ingredients” stay fresh? Start Smart → Know what matters: Identify your critical data (customer IDs, revenue, transactions) → Pick your battles: Monitor high-impact tables first, not everything at once Build the Guardrails: → Set clear rules: Is data arriving on time? Is anything missing? Are formats consistent? → Automate checks: Embed validations in your pipelines (Airflow, Prefect) to catch issues before they spread → Test in slices: Check daily or weekly chunks first—spot problems early, fix them fast Stay Alert (But Not Overwhelmed): → Tune your alarms: Too many false alerts = team burnout. Adjust thresholds to match real patterns → Build dashboards: Visual KPIs help everyone see what's healthy and what's breaking Fix It Right: → Dig into logs when things break—schema changes? Missing files? → Refresh everything downstream: Fix the source, then update dependent dashboards and reports → Validate your fix: Rerun checks, confirm KPIs improve before moving on Now, in the era of AI, data quality deserves even sharper focus. Models amplify what data feeds them — they can’t fix your bad ingredients. → Garbage in = hallucinations out. LLMs amplify bad data exponentially → Bias detection starts with clean, representative datasets → Automate quality checks using AI itself—anomaly detection, schema drift monitoring → Version your data like code: Track lineage, changes, and rollback when needed Here's the amazing step-by-step guide curated by DQOps - Piotr Czarnas to deep dive in the fundamentals of Data Quality. Clean data isn’t a process — it’s a discipline. 💬 What's your biggest data quality challenge right now?

AI is only as smart as its data. Bad data breaks everything. Good data builds the future. AI in healthcare is not magic. It is math, logic, and trust—stacked on a backbone of clean, connected data. Here’s the truth: • AI can’t fix broken data. • Automation fails if the data is a mess. • Connected care needs a solid data foundation. Think of data as the bones of a body. If the bones are weak, nothing stands. If the bones are strong, you can build muscle, move fast, and stay healthy. To build smarter AI and real connected care, start with these pillars: 1/ Data Quality:   Garbage in, garbage out.   Every record, every field, every update must be right.   No duplicates. No missing info. No errors.   Clean data is the first rule. 2/ Interoperability:   Systems must talk to each other.   Break down silos.   Use standards like HL7, FHIR, and APIs.   If your data can’t move, your care can’t connect. 3/ Privacy and Security:   Trust is everything.   Encrypt data.   Control access.   Follow HIPAA and GDPR.   Patients own their data—protect it. 4/ Governance:   Set the rules.   Who can see what?   Who can change what?   Audit trails, clear roles, and strong policies keep data safe and useful. 5/ Infrastructure Flexibility:   Cloud, on-prem, or hybrid—pick what fits.   Scale up as you grow.   Don’t get locked in.   Your data backbone must bend, not break. 6/ Continuous Improvement:   Data is never “done.”   Check, clean, and update all the time.   Train your team.   Make data quality a habit, not a project. When you get these right, you unlock: • Smarter automation • Real-time insights • Scalable AI that learns and adapts • Seamless patient care across systems The best AI in the world can’t save bad data. But with the right data backbone, you build care that connects, scales, and lasts. Start with better data. Build the future of healthcare—one clean record at a time.

🚀 Every enterprise wants AI. But not everyone is ready for it. In most organizations, the biggest barrier to AI success isn’t the model, the vendor, or the cloud platform… It’s the data. Here’s why enterprise data maturity is now the single most important success factor for any AI initiative: 📊 1. AI is only as good as the data feeding it Models don’t create intelligence, they learn it. And if your enterprise data is: * inconsistent * siloed * duplicated * outdated * ungoverned …then even the best AI platforms will deliver noisy, biased, or misleading insights. Clean, connected, trusted data = reliable AI outcomes. 🧩 2. Data Governance is no longer optional AI amplifies whatever it’s trained on, good or bad. Organizations now need: * Clear data ownership * Standardized definitions * Metadata management * Access controls & lineage * Enterprise taxonomies Without governance, AI becomes a liability instead of an accelerator. 🔍 3. Contextual data > raw data AI needs context to interpret enterprise information: * Who owns the data? * What system created it? * How fresh is it? * What business process does it represent? This is where data catalogs, business glossaries, and lineage tools become critical. Context drives intelligence. ⚙️ 4. Integrated data unlocks enterprise-wide AI Siloed data creates siloed AI. To scale AI across the business, organizations need: * Unified data platforms * API-driven integration * A consistent semantic layer * Enterprise Master Data Management (MDM) When systems talk to each other, AI actually becomes predictive and proactive. 🔐 5. Responsible AI starts with responsible data Bias, fairness, privacy, explainability, all of it is rooted in how data is sourced and managed. Good data practices reduce regulatory risk and increase trust in AI systems. 🌐 6. Enterprise data determines AI ROI Companies that invest in: * data quality * data architecture * data engineering * data governance * data observability …see dramatically higher returns from their AI investments. The equation is simple: Strong data foundation → faster AI deployment → higher business value. 🧠 Final Thought AI isn’t magic. It’s math running on data.

Your data is the reason you can’t scale AI in your business It’s the elephant in the room of AI adoption. Your data. We see this all the time. The board wants to adopt AI. Use cases are developed. People get excited. Weeks later? Nothing. AI initiatives don’t fail because of the models. They fail because the data is a mess: • No one knows who owns what • Data scattered across 12 different systems • Everything breaks when Susan from accounting retires • Your "single source of truth" has three different versions Sound familiar? Here's what actually works. A data-first approach that turns pilots into production wins: 1. Start with the end in mind Pick 1-2 use cases that move the needle. Define exactly what success looks like and what data quality you need to get there. No fuzzy metrics. 2. Map your data reality Audit what you actually have versus what you need. Score your data quality on completeness, accuracy, and timeliness. Be honest about the gaps. 3. Build quality into the foundation Standardize your formats before you build anything else. Set up automatic quality checks that catch problems before they break your AI. Fix issues in hours, not weeks. 4. Make data accessible when it's needed Centralize everything in one governed system. Create clean, documented datasets with clear ownership and freshness guarantees. 5. Protect what matters Classify sensitive information. Build in privacy protections. Test for bias and security issues. Don't launch until these pass. The magic happens when you get this right: → Every new AI project starts stronger. → Every model performs better. → Every launch happens faster. Your data quality becomes your competitive moat. The companies winning with AI aren't the ones with the fanciest models. They're the ones with the cleanest data. What data gap will you close this week? ⬇️ Let me know in the comments Want to know if AI is worth it? Use my ROI calculator. It’s free. ⬇️ Sign up here https://lnkd.in/dKNuKHza ♻️ Repost to help your network ship AI from pilot to production

𝟰𝟯% 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗜 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 Yet most organizations spend 80% on models and 20% on data. Your AI is only as smart as your data is clean. The pattern repeats across industries 👇 📊 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗶𝘀 Informatica's 2025 CDO survey found: ➜ 43% cite data quality as #1 obstacle to AI success ➜ 57% report data is NOT AI-ready ➜ Only 5% of organizations have comprehensive data governance 📉 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗕𝗮𝗱 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲 The data exists but: → Lives in 47 different systems with no integration → Uses inconsistent formats and definitions → Contains unknown biases that propagate through AI → Lacks lineage—nobody knows where it came from → Has quality issues discovered only after deployment Gartner predicts 30% of GenAI projects abandoned by end of 2025 due to poor data quality. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗘𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 Organizations achieving production AI allocate 50-70% of timeline and budget to data readiness. Here's what they build: 1. 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗵𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 Completeness: Do you have sufficient volume? Accuracy: Is the data correct? Consistency: Do definitions match across systems? Timeliness: Is data current enough for decisions? Validity: Does data conform to business rules? 2. 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗮𝗴𝗲 & 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 For every data point: Where did it originate? How was it transformed? What systems touched it? When was it last validated? You can't trust AI you can't trace. 3. 𝗕𝗶𝗮𝘀 𝗗𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 & 𝗠𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 identify: Sample bias (unrepresentative training data) Historical bias (past discrimination baked in) Measurement bias (flawed data collection) Aggregation bias (combining incompatible data) Then engineer mitigation before deployment. 4. 𝗔𝗜 𝗚𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 requires: Model-specific data requirements documentation Continuous data quality monitoring Automated drift detection Regular revalidation cycles 5. 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 Build platforms that enable: Extraction from source systems Normalization and transformation Quality dashboards with real-time monitoring Retention controls meeting compliance requirements API access for AI consumption Data readiness is NEVER "complete." It's continuous discipline requiring dedicated ownership. The Data Excellence Test: Ask yourself these questions: ✓ Can you trace any data point from source to consumption? ✓ Can you explain its quality metrics and bias profile? ✓ Do you have automated systems detecting data drift? ✓ Can you demonstrate data governance to regulators? ✓ Do you spend more on data infrastructure than AI models? If you answered "no" to any of these, you're building on quicksand. ♻️ Repost if you've seen AI fail due to data problems ➕ Follow for Pillar 4 tomorrow: Governance & Risk 💭 What percentage of your AI budget goes to data readiness?

If your data is a mess, your AI will lie to you…confidently. And that’s the part of AI transformation no one wants to headline. Everyone wants to talk about agents, copilots, and automation at scale. But the least sexy part of AI is actually the most important: data quality, process discipline, and governance. MIT Sloan, McKinsey, and BCG all point to the same root cause when AI underdelivers: Most failures start with inconsistent data and fragmented workflows, not the model itself. Inaccurate inputs → biased processes → hallucinated outputs. AI simply scales whatever foundation you give it. In transforming HR at TD SYNNEX, we spent lots of time on foundation first. 👉🏼 Clean, connected data. Simplified and standardized processes. Clear ownership. Trustworthy governance. Co-built with our teams, not pushed on them. I sleep better knowing we invested in this critical step. Get the fundamentals right, and AI becomes a force multiplier. Ignore them, and it becomes a risk multiplier. Not flashy. But absolutely essential to unlocking real enterprise value.

I’m obsessed with one truth: 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 is AI’s make-or-break. And it's not that simple to get right ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ Gartner estimates an average organization pays $12.9M in annual losses due to low data quality. AI and Data Engineers know the stakes. Bad data wastes time, breaks trust, and kills potential. Thinking through and implementing a Data Quality Framework helps turn chaos into precision. Here’s why it’s non-negotiable and how to design one. 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗗𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗜 AI’s potential hinges on data integrity. Substandard data leads to flawed predictions, biased models, and eroded trust. ⚡️ Inaccurate data undermines AI, like a healthcare model misdiagnosing due to incomplete records.   ⚡️ Engineers lose their time with short-term fixes instead of driving innovation.   ⚡️ Missing or duplicated data fuels bias, damaging credibility and outcomes. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 A data quality framework ensures your data is AI-ready by defining standards, enforcing rigor, and sustaining reliability. Without it, you’re risking your money and time. Core dimensions:   💡 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆: Uniform data across systems, like standardized formats.   💡 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆: Data reflecting reality, like verified addresses.   💡 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗶𝘁𝘆: Data adhering to rules, like positive quantities.   💡 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀: No missing fields, like full transaction records.   💡 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀: Current data for real-time applications.   💡 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀: No duplicates to distort insights. It's not just a theoretical concept in a vacuum. It's a practical solution you can implement. For example, Databricks Data Quality Framework (link in the comments, kudos to the team Denny Lee Jules Damji Rahul Potharaju), for example, leverages these dimensions, using Delta Live Tables for automated checks (e.g., detecting null values) and Lakehouse Monitoring for real-time metrics. But any robust framework (custom or tool-based) must align with these principles to succeed. 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲, 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗜𝘀 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 Automation accelerates, but human oversight ensures excellence. Tools can flag issues like missing fields or duplicates in real time, saving countless hours. Yet, automation alone isn’t enough—human input and oversight are critical. A framework without human accountability risks blind spots. 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 ✅ Set standards, identify key dimensions for your AI (e.g., completeness for analytics). Define rules, like “no null customer IDs.”   ✅ Automate enforcement, embed checks in pipelines using tools.   ✅ Monitor continuously, track metrics like error rates with dashboards. Databricks’ Lakehouse Monitoring is one option, adapt to your stack.   ✅ Lead with oversight, assign a team to review metrics, refine rules, and ensure human judgment. #DataQuality #AI #DataEngineering #AIEngineering

𝗙𝗶𝘅𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗜𝘁 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝘀 𝗔𝗜 As organizations accelerate AI adoption, many are discovering an uncomfortable truth: AI does not fix bad data. 𝗜𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝘁. Models trained on flawed, inconsistent, or incomplete data do not create intelligence. They amplify risk, accelerate errors, and erode trust. The issue is rarely the algorithm. It is the data. In conversations with CIOs, I often hear the same phrase: “𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗶𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗜.” What they are describing is not a tooling gap. It is a quality and governance gap. In legacy environments, data quality challenges are deeply embedded: Inconsistent definitions across systems. Duplicate and fragmented records. Unreliable lineage and limited traceability. Pipelines designed for reporting, not operational decision-making. Data that is simply unfit for AI. When AI initiatives scale, these weaknesses surface quickly and publicly. Data quality is not a cleansing exercise. It is a governance discipline. Improving it requires: Clear ownership and accountability. Standardized definitions and metadata. End-to-end lineage and traceability. Quality controls embedded into data pipelines. Alignment between business context and technical architecture. 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝗜. Organizations that modernize successfully treat data quality not as remediation, but as foundational infrastructure. Fix the data before it breaks the AI. #AIGovernance #DataQuality

🔍 AI Starts with Clean Data: Guy Peri's Blueprint for Enterprise Transformation at McCormick & Company In this episode of Technovation, I spoke with Guy Peri, Chief Information and Digital Officer of McCormick & Company, about his approach to building a digitally enabled, AI-ready enterprise—starting with data governance. Here are a few takeaways that stood out: 🔹 AI-Powered Forecasting & Procurement Guy's team leverages 30 years of procurement data, layered with external signals, to predict raw material pricing—a mission-critical capability for McCormick's flavor operations. 🔹 Building a Data-First Culture He's prioritizing data hygiene, governance, and quality as foundational to any AI effort—especially in product innovation and manufacturing. 🔹 The Future of Work with AI Agents Guy shares how McCormick is preparing for agentic AI by reimagining roles, upskilling talent, and embracing citizen data scientists. 🎧 In this episode, we also discuss: — The making of McCormick's Flavor Forecast — Smart manufacturing and demand planning — How Guy's 28 years at P&G shaped his data-first leadership style — Enterprise-wide upskilling to drive AI adoption 👉 Listen to the full episode here: https://lnkd.in/envDaS3n 💬 For fellow CIOs and digital leaders: How are you laying the groundwork for scalable AI? I'd love to hear what's working in your org. #AI #DataStrategy #DigitalTransformation #CIO #Technovation