AI Prompt Improvement

STOP asking ChatGPT to "make it better". Here's how to better prompt it instead: ☑ Clearly Identify the Issue Rather than a vague “make it better,” specify the exact element that needs change. For example: "Rewrite the second paragraph so it includes three concrete examples of our product’s benefits. The tone must be formal and persuasive. Remove any informal language or redundant phrases." ☑ Divide the Task into Discrete Steps Break the overall revision into a sequence of manageable tasks. For example: "Go through my instructions, step by step. – Step 1: Summarize it in one sentence. – Step 2: Identify two specific weaknesses. – Step 3: Rewrite the text to address these weaknesses, incorporating specific data or examples." ☑ Specify the Format and Level of Detail Define exactly how the final output should look. For example: "Provide the final revised text as a numbered list where each item contains 2–3 sentences. Each item must include at least one statistical fact or concrete example, and the overall response should not exceed 250 words." ☑ Request a Chain-of-Thought Explanation Ask the model to detail its reasoning process before giving the final output. For example: "Before providing the final revised text, explain your reasoning step-by-step. Identify which parts need improvement and how your changes will enhance clarity and professionalism. Then, present the final revised version." ☑ Conditional Instructions to Enforce Compliance Add if/then conditions to ensure all requirements are met. For example: "If the revised text does not include at least two concrete examples, then add a sentence with a real-world statistic. Otherwise, finalize the response as is." ☑ Consolidate All Instructions into One Prompt Integrate all the detailed instructions into a single, comprehensive prompt. For example: "First, identify the section of the text that needs improvement and explain why it is lacking. Next, summarize the current text in one sentence and list two specific weaknesses. Then, rewrite the text to address these weaknesses, ensuring the revised version includes three concrete examples, uses a formal and persuasive tone, and is structured as a numbered list with each item containing 2–3 sentences. Each list item must include at least one statistical fact or example, and the overall response must be no longer than 250 words. Before providing the final text, explain your reasoning step-by-step. If the revised text does not include at least two concrete examples, add an additional sentence with a real-world statistic." ___ Why This Works People never give enough context. And once ChatGPT answers, they never correct it enough. Think about it like an intern. Deep prompting is all about precision: give clear instructions, context & the right corrections. PS: Don't forget to use the new o3-mini model. It's crushing any other one. Yes – even DeepSeek.

The interview is for a GenAI Engineer role at Anthropic. Interviewer: "Your prompt gives perfect answers during testing - but fails randomly in production. What’s wrong?" You: “Ah, the prompt drift problem. Identical prompts can yield different outputs due to sampling (temperature/top-p) or shift entirely under paraphrased inputs." Interviewer: "Meaning?" You: "LLMs don't understand instructions - they predict them. A single rephrased sentence, longer context, or slight temperature change can push the model into a different completion path. What looks deterministic in a 10-example test collapses under real-world input diversity." Interviewer: "So how do you fix it?" You: Treat prompts like production code: 1. Prompt templates - lock phrasing with {{placeholders}} for user input. 2. Lock sampling - fix temperature=0, top_p=1 for reproducibility. 3. System-level guardrails - e.g., "Always respond in valid JSON matching this schema: {{schema}}" 4. Fuzz-test inputs - run 1k+ paraphrased variants pre-deploy. 5. Delimiters + structure -> Prevents bleed and enforces parsing: """USER_INPUT: {{input}}""" """OUTPUT_FORMAT: {{schema}}""" Interviewer: "So prompt reliability is more about engineering than creativity?" You: "Exactly. Creative prompting gets you demos. Structured prompting gets you products." Interviewer: "What’s your golden rule for prompt design?" You: “Prompts are code. They need versioning, testing, and regression tracking - not vibes. If you can’t reproduce the output, you can’t trust it." Interviewer: "So prompt drift is basically a reliability bug?" You: "Yes - and fixing it turns GenAI from a prototype into a platform." #PromptEngineering #GenerativeAI

Prompt engineering is the new consulting superpower. Most haven't realized it yet. Over the last couple of days, I reviewed the latest guides by Google, Anthropic and OpenAI. Some of the key recommendations to improve output: → Being very specific about expertise levels requested → Using structured instructions or meta prompts → Explicitly referencing project documents in the prompt → Asking the model to "think step by step" Based on the guides, here are four ways to immediately level up your prompting skill set as a consultant: 1. Define the expert persona precisely "You're a specialist with 15 years in retail supply chain optimization who has worked with Target and Walmart." Why it matters: The model draws from deeper technical patterns, not just general concepts. 2. Structure the deliverable explicitly "Provide 3 key insights, their implications and then support each with data-driven evidence." Why it matters: This gives me structured material that needs minimal editing. 3. Set distinctive success parameters "Focus on operational inefficiencies that competitors typically overlook." Why it matters: You push the model beyond obvious answers to genuine competitive insights. 4. Establish the decision context "This is for a CEO with a risk-averse investor applying pressure to improve their gross margins." Why it matters: The recommendations align with stakeholder realities and urgency. The above were the main takeaways I took from the guides which I found helpful. When you run these prompts versus generic statements, you will see a massive difference in quality and relevance. Bonus tips which are working for me: → Create prompt templates using the four elements → Test different expert personas against the same problem (I regularly use "Senior McKinsey partner" to counter my position detecting gaps in my thinking.) → Ask the model to identify contradictions or gaps in the data before finalizing any recommendations. We’re only scratching the surface of what these “intelligence partners” can offer. Getting better at prompting may be one of the most asymmetric skill opportunities all of us have today. Share your favourite prompting tip below! P.S Was this post helpful? Should I share one post per week on how I’m improving my AI-related skills?

A few months ago, a colleague screamed at Microsoft Copilot like he was auditioning for Bring Me The Horizon. He typed, “Make this into a presentation.” Copilot spat out something. He yelled, “NO, I SAID PROFESSIONAL!” It revised it. Still wrong. “WHY ARE YOU SO STUPID?” And that, dear reader, is when it hit me. It’s not the AI. It’s you. Or rather, your prompts. So, if you've ever felt like ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, or any of those AI Agents are more "artificial" than "intelligent"? Then rethink how you’re talking to them. Here are 10 prompt engineering fundamentals that’ll stop you from sounding like you're yelling into the void. 1. Lead with Intent. Start with a clear command: “You are an expert…,” “Generate a monthly report…,” “Translate this to French…" This orients the model instantly. 2. Scope & Constraints First. Define boundaries up front. Length limits, style guides, data sources, even forbidden terms. 3. Format Your Output. Specify JSON schema, markdown headers, or table columns. Models love explicit structure over free form prose. 4. Provide Minimal, High Quality Examples. Two or three exemplar Q→A pairs beat a paragraph of explanation every time. 5. Isolate Subtasks. Break complex workflows into discrete prompts (chain of thought). One prompt per action: analyze, summarize, critique, then assemble. 6. Anchor with Delimiters. Use triple backticks or XML tags to fence inputs. Cuts hallucinations in half. 7. Inject Domain Signals. Name specific frameworks (“Use SWOT analysis,” “Apply the Eisenhower Matrix,” “Leverage Porter’s Five Forces”) to nudge depth. 8. Iterate Rapidly. Version your prompts like code. A/B test variations, track which phrasing yields the cleanest output. 9. Tune the “Why.” Always ask for reasoning steps. Always. 10. Template & Automate. Build parameterized prompt templates in your repo. Still with me? Good. Bonus tips. 1. Token Economy Awareness. Place critical context in the first 200 tokens. Anything beyond 1,500 risks context drift. 2. Temperature vs. Prompt Depth. Higher temperature amplifies creativity. Only if your prompt is concise. Otherwise you get noise. 3. Use “Chain of Questions.” Instead of one long prompt, fire sequential, linked questions. You’ll maintain context and sharpen focus. 4. Mirror the LLM’s Own Language. Scan model outputs for phrasing patterns and reflect those idioms back in your prompts. 5. Treat Prompts as Living Docs. Embed metrics in comments: note output quality, error rates, hallucination frequency. Keep iterating until ROI justifies the effort. And finally, the bit no one wants to hear. You get better at using AI by using AI. Practice like you’re training a dragon. Eventually, it listens. And when it does, it’s magic. You now know more about prompt engineering than 98% of LinkedIn. Which means you should probably repost this. Just saying. ♻️

Anthropic dropped the best free masterclass on prompt engineering Here’s what you’ll learn in 9 chapters: 1. Structure better prompts → Always start with the intent: “Summarize this article in 5 bullet points for a beginner” is 10x better than “Summarize this.” → Use instruction-first phrasing, the model performs best when it knows exactly what you want upfront. 2. Be clear + direct → Avoid open-ended ambiguity. Instead of “Tell me about success,” ask “List 3 traits successful startup founders share.” → Use active voice, fewer adjectives, and always define vague terms. 3. Assign the right “role” → Start with: “You are a [role]”, this frames the model’s mindset. Example: “You are a skeptical investor evaluating a pitch.” → Roles unlock tone, precision, and even memory, especially in multi-turn chats. 4. Think step by step (Precondition prompts) → Ask the model to plan before it answers: “First, list your steps. Then, perform them one by one.” → This dramatically improves accuracy and reduces hallucinations in complex tasks. 5. Avoid hallucinations → Anchor the model with clear boundaries: “Only answer if the input contains [x]. Otherwise, respond: ‘Insufficient data.’” → Reduce creativity in factual tasks. E.g., “Be concise. Don’t assume.” 6. Build complex prompts (with reusable patterns) → Use modular blocks: context → instruction → format → examples. → Build a personal prompt library by saving + refining your best-performing prompts over time. It’s not just “how to prompt better.” It’s a full-on skill upgrade. Interactive. Structured. Free. Share this with anyone still writing 1-line prompts. Image: Hesamation

Prompting is not about typing better sentences. It’s about transferring intent clearly. When AI outputs feel off, incomplete, or confusing, the issue is rarely intelligence. It’s almost always a gap in instruction - missing context, unclear goals, or poorly defined boundaries. This guide lays out 20 practical rules of prompt engineering that address exactly those gaps. It shows how small changes in how you ask can completely change what you get back. The framework covers how to: - Clearly define what you want and why you’re asking - Assign the right role so the model responds from the correct perspective - Provide context that removes assumptions and guesswork - Control structure, tone, and level of detail in advance - Break complex requests into smaller, sequential steps - Use examples to anchor expectations instead of hoping the model guesses - Apply constraints to reduce fluff, repetition, and irrelevant output - Iterate deliberately instead of rewriting prompts from scratch - Validate responses and catch logical gaps early These rules don’t make prompts longer. They make them more intentional. Once you apply this approach, AI stops feeling unpredictable. Responses become more consistent, more usable, and closer to what you actually had in mind. Prompting then shifts from trial-and-error to a repeatable workflow - one you can rely on for writing, analysis, coding, planning, and decision support. If AI is part of how you think and work, this kind of structure quietly improves everything that comes after. Would love to know which of these rules you already use and which ones surprised you.

Prompt formatting can have a dramatic impact on LLM performance, but it varies substantially across models. Some pragmatic findings from a recent research paper: 💡 Prompt Format Significantly Affects LLM Performance. Different prompt formats (plain text, Markdown, YAML, JSON) can result in performance variations of up to 40%, depending on the task and model. For instance, GPT-3.5-turbo showed a dramatic performance shift between Markdown and JSON in code translation tasks, while GPT-4 exhibited greater stability. This indicates the importance of testing and optimizing prompts for specific tasks and models. 🛠️ Tailor Formats to Task and Model. Prompt formats like JSON, Markdown, YAML, and plain text yield different performance outcomes across tasks. For instance, GPT-3.5-turbo performed 40% better in JSON for code tasks, while GPT-4 preferred Markdown for reasoning tasks. Test multiple formats early in your process to identify which structure maximizes results for your specific task and model. 📋 Keep Instructions and Context Explicit. Include clear task instructions, persona descriptions, and examples in your prompts. For example, specifying roles (“You are a Python coder”) and output style (“Respond in JSON”) improves model understanding. Consistency in how you frame the task across different formats minimizes confusion and enhances reliability. 📊 Choose Format Based on Data Complexity. For simple tasks, plain text or Markdown often suffices. For structured outputs like programming or translations, formats such as JSON or YAML may perform better. Align the prompt format with the complexity of the expected response to leverage the model’s capabilities fully. 🔄 Iterate and Validate Performance. Run tests with variations in prompt structure to measure impact. Tools like Coefficient of Mean Deviation (CMD) or Intersection-over-Union (IoU) can help quantify performance differences. Start with benchmarks like MMLU or HumanEval to validate consistency and accuracy before deploying at scale. 🚀 Leverage Larger Models for Stability. If working with sensitive tasks requiring consistent outputs, opt for larger models like GPT-4, which show better robustness to format changes. For instance, GPT-4 maintained higher performance consistency across benchmarks compared to GPT-3.5. Link to paper in comments.

Most people don’t realize: AI can coach you on how to prompt it better. Here’s how to turn AI into your personal prompt coach, so you get better results and learn how to use AI faster. Try this two-step fix: 1. State your goal and context. 2. Ask one of these questions: ➡️ "How would you rewrite my prompt to get more [specific, creative, detailed, etc.] responses?" ➡️ "If you were trying to get [desired outcome], how would you modify this prompt?" ➡️ "If this were your prompt, what would you change to make it more effective?" ➡️ "What elements are missing from my prompt that would help you generate better responses?" ➡️ "How might you enhance this prompt to avoid common pitfalls or misinterpretations?" ➡️ Or simply: "Improve my prompt." Before: "Explain force majeure clauses." After: "Analyze how courts in California have interpreted force majeure clauses in commercial leases since COVID-19, focusing on what constitutes 'unforeseeable circumstances' and the burden of proof required to invoke these provisions." The difference? A broad, non-jx specific, superficial overview vs. actionable legal insights for commercial leases in California. Not only will you get better outcomes, but you will learn how to improve your prompting in the process. What are your go-to strategies or favorite prompts to optimize AI responses?

In just a few minutes, here’s one thing you can do to make AI outputs 10x sharper. One of the most common reasons that prompts fail is not because they are too long, but because they lack personal context. And the fastest fix is to dictate your context. Speak for five to ten minutes about the problem, your audience, and the outcome you want, then paste the transcript into your prompt. Next, add your intent and your boundaries in plain language. For example: “I want to advocate for personal healthcare. Keep the tone empowering, not invasive. Do not encourage oversharing. Help people feel supported in the doctor’s office without implying that all responsibility sits on them.” Lastly, tell the model exactly what to produce. You might say: “Draft the first 400 words, include a clear call to action, and give me three title options.” Here’s a mini template: → State who you are and who this is for → Describe your stance and what to emphasize → Add guardrails for tone, privacy, and any “don’ts” → Set constraints like length, format, and voice → Specify the deliverable you want next Until AI memory reliably holds your details, you are responsible for supplying them. Feed the model your story - no need to include PII - to turn generic responses into work that sounds like you.

Unlock the potential of Generative AI to enhance your writing, creativity, and coding skills through prompt engineering. Prompt engineering is a key skill that involves crafting detailed, structured inputs to guide AI towards generating precise, useful outputs. Here are the core strategies to master: - Guide Precisely: Provide detailed instructions for clear, targeted outcomes. - Rich Context: Supply comprehensive background information for more accurate and relevant responses. - Experiment: Start with the basics, then explore more complex requests as you become more comfortable. Improve your AI interactions with these tips: 1. Specificity and Iterations: Craft detailed prompts and refine based on the AI's feedback. 2. Contextual Depth: The more context you provide, the better the AI understands your request, leading to more tailored outputs. 3. Multi-Modal Inputs: Beyond text, incorporate images, code, or data for varied and rich outputs. 4. Example Use: Include examples of what you're aiming for and what you want to avoid to guide the AI more effectively. 5. Advanced Features: Tweak settings like creativity level and response length to get the results you need. 6. Unique Capabilities: Utilize the AI's broad knowledge and support for specific tasks, such as coding assistance. ✍️ Suppose you want to learn a new skill. Here's a prompt template incorporating the above principles: 'I'm eager to learn [Skill Name], aiming to use it for [specific purpose or project]. My background is in [Your Background], and my experience with similar skills is [Your Experience Level]. I aim to build a foundational understanding and complete my first project within [Timeframe]. Could you provide a structured learning path that includes: The key concepts and fundamentals of [Skill Name] I should focus on. Recommendations for online courses, tutorials, and books suitable for beginners. Practical exercises or projects for applying what I learn. Tips for staying motivated and overcoming challenges. Strategies for applying [Skill Name] in real-world situations or job opportunities.' This approach ensures a personalized, goal-oriented learning strategy, leveraging AI's capabilities to support your journey in mastering a new skill. #generativeai #ai #promptengineering #upskill #learning