If AI in your company still lives inside chat windows… you haven’t started the Agentic journey yet. Today’s Agentic AI systems don’t just answer questions. They observe signals, make decisions, trigger tools, coordinate workflows, and continuously improve outcomes. Instead of assisting humans one task at a time, these agents run end-to-end business operations across sales, support, finance, engineering, HR, and marketing. This is what production-grade Agentic AI actually looks like inside modern organizations: - Customer Support Agents Handle FAQs, resolve tickets, process refunds, update CRM systems, and escalate complex issues automatically. - Sales Ops Agents Qualify incoming leads, enrich prospect data, update pipelines, generate follow-ups, and notify sales teams in real time. - Marketing Automation Agents Plan campaigns, analyze audiences, generate content, schedule outreach, track performance, and optimize future runs. - Data Analysis Agents Convert business questions into SQL, clean datasets, analyze trends, generate insights, and deliver visual summaries. - Reporting Agents Pull metrics, validate data, create dashboards, write narratives, and distribute reports across stakeholders automatically. - QA / Testing Agents Generate test cases, execute regressions, detect failures, log bugs, and recommend fixes without manual intervention. - DevOps Agents Monitor infrastructure, detect anomalies, run diagnostics, apply rollbacks, notify teams, and assist deployments. - Finance Ops Agents Process invoices, categorize transactions, reconcile records, flag anomalies, and generate financial summaries. - HR Ops Agents Manage resume intake, screen candidates, schedule interviews, update HR systems, and respond to employee queries. - Research Agents Search documents and web sources, extract key findings, compare references, and summarize insights. - Content Creation Agents Outline topics, draft content, optimize for SEO and branding, publish assets, and track engagement end-to-end. - Internal Tools Agents Act as company copilots - understanding employee requests, calling internal APIs, executing actions, and confirming results. The real shift? These agents don’t just respond. They reason. They orchestrate tools. They execute workflows. They learn from feedback. They operate continuously. This is how organizations move from isolated automation to connected, outcome-driven AI systems. Not experiments. Not demos. Not pilots. Real production systems.
Understanding Agents as a Service
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Understanding agents as a service means recognizing AI-powered tools that operate autonomously across business tasks, making decisions and coordinating actions without human intervention. These agents are not just chatbots—they are complex, multi-layered systems that interact with data, tools, and other agents to run entire workflows.
- Prioritize infrastructure: Build a solid foundation with secure data storage, reliable communication, and robust reasoning models to support agent operations.
- Design for autonomy: Structure your agent management and coordination layers so agents can plan, act, and collaborate without manual oversight.
- Control and explain: Develop user interfaces that let people set boundaries and review agent decisions to maintain trust and prevent mistakes.
-
-
Why everyone’s chasing smarter #AIagents But why do most fail at scale? If you want agents that: • Make decisions • Coordinate across systems • Work in real-time environments • Respect rules, context, and security Start by understanding this 4-layer architecture. It’s not just technical plumbing, it’s what makes AI agentic. The 4-layer architecture that makes agents truly autonomous. Most AI efforts stop at the model or interface. But real autonomy doesn’t happen at the surface. It happens underneath across four deeply integrated layers. Let’s break down the full stack that powers #AgenticAI: 𝟭. 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿: 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 & 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗲𝘀 → Foundation Models provide reasoning (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, etc.) → Compute gives real-time performance (Cloud, Edge, AI chips) → Communication Infra ensures connectivity (wireless + wired) → Data & Knowledge: Business data, public data, prompts, knowledge graphs, this is the fuel that feeds agents Without this layer, agents can’t think, act, or even exist. 𝟮. 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿: 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 → Each agent is a loop of Perception → Planning → Action → Memory → Supports both Virtual and Embodied Agents (think robots, drones, cars) → Manages identity, registration, capabilities, and access control This is where agents are “born” and with autonomy, context, and purpose. 𝟯. 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗖𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿: 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲 → Enables multi-agent orchestration, task matching, and collaboration → Implements protocols for trust, security, privacy, and incentives → Handles conflicts, negotiations, and delegation between agents Think of this layer as the social operating system for AI. 𝟰. 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿: 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹-𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 → Powers real-world use cases: smart homes, autonomous driving, healthcare, cities, factories → Connects with real-world systems via modality, semantics, and interface alignment This is where users experience the magic, but it only works if the 3 layers beneath are sound. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 Does 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿: • You can’t duct-tape a model into an #autonomousAgent. • You need a full-stack architecture with governance, cognition, collaboration, and infrastructure. Are you designing for autonomy or still building traditional automation?
-
Everyone is talking about AI Agents. But where do they actually fit in your tech stack? 👇 Following up on my last post about the Building Agents on Google Cloud Learning Path, let’s demystify what an agent actually is, and the architectural components that make it tick. First, a reality check: We’re on the Cloud now. An AI Application is just a Cloud Application that contains one or more AI agents. The agent itself is simply a service that autonomously reasons to solve tasks using tools and data. And like all services, an AI agent must meet your production standards: 🔹 Production-ready: It must meet compliance, deploy via CI/CD pipelines, and withstand abusive traffic. 🔹 Security & Safety: It needs secure access to resources, strong guardrails against hallucinations, and strict token-spend limits. 🔹 Standardization: It must speak standard protocols like A2A (Agent-to-Agent) and MCP (Model Context Protocol). 🔹 Adaptability: It requires a dynamic policy model that shifts based on the specific task or tool. Once you understand these baseline rules, you can start mapping the chaotic market ecosystem. Here is how the architectural layers break down and where your favorite tools sit: ➡️ Models (The Reasoning Engine) - Role: The core intelligence. - Market: Gemini, Claude, OpenAI. Note: These provide raw intelligence, but they aren't agents until wrapped in an orchestration loop. ➡️ Orchestration & Frameworks (The Loop) - Role: The code that manages the plan-execute-reflect cycle. - Market: LangGraph, CrewAI, AG2, and the Agent Development Kit (ADK). ➡️ Tools & Connectivity (The Hands) - Role: Where the agent does actual work (calling APIs, querying DBs, browsing). - Market: This is where MCP thrives, connecting agents to GitHub, Slack, or your custom enterprise data. ➡️ Runtime & Infrastructure (The Foundation) - Role: Where the code runs, memory is persisted, and traffic is managed. - Market: Kubernetes (GKE), Serverless (Cloud Run), and Vertex AI Agent Engine. 🚀 The Top Layer: Agentic Applications Beyond the core components, we are seeing the rise of vertically integrated workflows built on top of this entire stack. Think of Agentic IDEs like Antigravity, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and Copilot - bundling models, orchestration, and tools into high-velocity developer experiences. Understanding these layers is the key to choosing the right tool for the job. ⬇️
-
I just published a deep dive on Agent-as-a-Service in XAnge's 2025 Seed Blueprint. ❕ After advising dozens of European AI startups at AWS, I'm seeing the same architectural mistake over and over. Founders are bolting LLMs onto existing UIs and calling it "AI-powered." That's not innovation, that's technical debt with a chatbot. Here's what actually works: The Sidecar Pattern for Tool-ification Deploy a lightweight MCP (Model Context Protocol) server alongside your app. Auto-expose your OpenAPI endpoints as agent-discoverable tools. Don't rip up your codebase, extend it. Your "Search documents," "Create user," and "Generate report" functions become callable capabilities that any agent can orchestrate. Why Reinforcement Learning Isn't Optional Prompted agents are unreliable. Chain-of-thought reasoning breaks on multi-step workflows. The path to production-grade agents: → Capture trajectories (action sequences + tool I/O) from day one → Build a semantic layer/knowledge graph for tool dependencies → Apply RL to train specialized models on your specific domain Result? Smaller models that outperform GPT-4 on your task at 10x lower cost and latency. The Data Architecture Most Founders Skip You need three layers before your first agent ships: Trajectory storage - every agent action, input, and output Retrieval-augmented tool selection - serve only relevant tools per task (prevents prompt bloat) Knowledge graph - model tool relationships deterministically, not probabilistically It's the difference between a demo and a product. Business Model Primitives Usage-based pricing requires new infrastructure: Authenticated requests (tamper-proof activity records) Real-time credit ledger (transparency + compliance) Automated payment rails (no service interruptions) Enterprise customers won't adopt agents without audit trails and deterministic behavior. Build these primitives first. The European Advantage GDPR is a competitive moat. Data minimization, explicit consent, and transparent model behavior are trust primitives that shorten enterprise sales cycles. Vertical industries (manufacturing, logistics, health) with structured workflows and compliance requirements are perfect for agent orchestration. Europe owns this domain depth. What's Next The agent marketplace is forming now. AWS launched ours. Agentic browser for agent-discoverable services are emerging. If your service isn't callable by other agents, with machine-readable schemas and semantic descriptions, you're invisible in this economy. Teams that start this journey now with disciplined, data-first architecture will define the next decade of European software. Are you building for reinforcement learning from day one, or retrofitting it later?
-
The widespread use of intelligent agents across all software platforms is becoming common, but it's one that brings with it immense complexity for technology leaders. This a fundamental shift that will create new challenges in technical architecture, user experience, security, and business ethics. Technical Complexity: The "API Hell" of today, where we struggle to make different software systems communicate, will seem trivial compared to the Agent Interoperability Nightmare. Imagine an ecosystem where a Salesforce agent needs to talk to a Slack agent, a Mailchimp agent, and an Asana agent to complete a single task. There is currently no robust communication standard, no "HTTP for AIs," to govern these interactions. Without it, we'll face chaotic, brittle systems prone to failure. This proliferation of autonomous agents will also create a Single Source of Truth Problem on Steroids. With dozens of agents reading and writing data simultaneously, what happens when a HubSpot agent and a Salesforce agent update the same customer record at the same time with conflicting information? This will lead to data inconsistencies and "data phantoms," requiring incredibly sophisticated new methods to keep data synchronized. UX and Trust Complexity: From a user's perspective, the autonomy that makes these agents so powerful also makes them terrifying. This will create a Delegation vs. Control Paradox. Users will constantly be asking themselves how much power to give their agents. Grant too few permissions, and the agent is useless; grant too many, and you risk a catastrophic mistake. New user interfaces will be needed to provide "leashes" and granular control over agent actions. Another major challenge is the Black Box of "Why?" When an agent makes a decision you don't understand—like archiving a project or reassigning a lead—the first question will always be, "Why did you do that?" Every provider will need to build a robust "explainability interface" that shows the agent's reasoning. Without this, users will never fully trust their digital counterparts. Security and Data Governance Complexity The security implications of agents are staggering. A single compromised agent could be the ultimate prize for hackers. If an agent has authentication tokens for 20 different SaaS platforms, a hacker only needs to breach one system, creating a single point of failure with an enormous blast radius. We also face the risk of Data Leakage and Cross-Contamination. Business and Ethical Complexity: When agents start making autonomous business decisions, the complexity moves into the courtroom and the boardroom. The issue of Attribution and Accountability will be a legal quagmire. The proliferation of AI agents isn't just about building a smart tool; it's about building a responsible, secure, and interoperable ecosystem of agents. These challenges also bring with it plenty of opportunities and will create new job categories within technology functions.
-
Most organisations still design their products as if a human with a browser is the primary user. Soon, that may become an outdated assumption. In many contexts, your “user” will be an AI agent acting on a person’s behalf - researching options, comparing services, calling your APIs, filling in forms, triggering workflows. The human will mostly see the summary or the outcome. This is where Agent Experience (AX) comes in. Agent Experience is the holistic experience AI agents have when interacting with your product, platform, or system. It’s about how easily agents can access, understand and operate within your digital environment to achieve user-defined goals. We’ve spent years thinking about UX (User Experience), how humans interact with products. AX is the necessary next layer. AX (Agent Experience): how delegated AI agents navigate, interpret and use your services to deliver outcomes for people. In practice, that means asking questions like: > Can an agent discover what your service does without scraping random pages? > Are your APIs and workflows well-structured, documented and machine-readable (e.g. clear contracts, structured metadata, context files)? > Is authentication and authorisation designed so an agent can operate safely on a user’s behalf, with clear, auditable boundaries? > Do you treat “agent traffic” as a first-class channel in your logs, analytics and support - distinct from human sessions - so you can understand and improve it over time? Crucially, AX is still human-centric. On the other end of every agent is a person with needs, preferences and constraints. Agents are just a new medium - alongside web, mobile, call centres - through which those humans interact with your organisation. If you ignore AX, you risk becoming invisible to this new channel. In the early web, no website meant you effectively didn’t exist. Then search engines arrived and SEO determined whether you were discoverable. As AI agents begin to become the default entry point to digital services in some scenarios, poor Agent Experience means agents will route users to your competitors instead. If you’re building or leading a digital product, a useful thought experiment is: “If an AI agent were my primary user, what would I change about my product, APIs, documentation and governance?” I’ve written more about this in a recent article for The Drum: https://lnkd.in/eRGHvutq
-
CoT, ReAct, ToT, RAG, MCP, DAG. Most engineers building agents can't explain what these mean. They copy-paste from tutorials and wonder why their agent loops forever. Here's the AI Agent stack, decoded: 🔹 CoT (Chain of Thought) Make the model think step by step before answering. Without CoT, LLMs jump to conclusions. With it, they reason through problems. The difference between "guess" and "derive." 🔹 ReAct (Reason + Act) CoT plus tool use. The model reasons, then acts, then observes, then reasons again. This is how agents actually work. Think → Do → See → Repeat. Most "agents" skip the reasoning. That's why they fail. 🔹 ToT (Tree of Thoughts) CoT explores one path. ToT explores many. The model branches, evaluates, backtracks. Slower, but catches mistakes CoT misses. Use it when the first answer is usually wrong. 🔹 RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) Don't make the model memorize everything. Fetch what it needs at runtime. Vector search → relevant context → grounded answer. Without RAG, your agent hallucinates. With it, your agent cites sources. 🔹 MCP (Model Context Protocol) Anthropic's standard for connecting LLMs to external tools. One protocol. Any tool. No custom integrations per service. The USB-C of AI agents. 🔹 DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) How you orchestrate multi-step workflows without infinite loops. Task A → Task B → Task C. No cycles. Clear dependencies. LangGraph, Prefect, Airflow — all DAGs under the hood. The engineers who understand these don't just USE agent frameworks. They understand WHY agents work. Want to go deeper? Full Single-Agent Patterns deep-dive in comments 👇 💾 Bookmark this before your next agent breaks and you don't know why.
-
In 2024, we worried about system integration. APIs, middleware, data flows. In 2026, we're integrating AGENTS. Every major enterprise is deploying AI agents. Marketing has agents. Sales has agents. IT has agents. Operations has agents. And none of them talk to each other. Sound familiar? It's SOA all over again, but this time the "services" have autonomy, memory, and occasionally... opinions. Enter the A2A Protocol race. Microsoft, ServiceNow, Workday, and a dozen startups are all racing to solve "agent sprawl." The Agent2Agent protocol is emerging as the new standard for agents coordinating across systems. Think about what this means for enterprise architecture: Your procurement agent needs to talk to your finance agent. Your customer service agent needs to coordinate with your inventory agent. Your security agent needs to monitor ALL the other agents. MCP and A2A are becoming the new SOA. If you're building enterprise AI strategy, this is the infrastructure layer you can't ignore. We're not just connecting systems anymore. We're building a coordination layer for autonomous decision-makers. That's a fundamentally different architecture challenge. #AI #Transformation #Architecture #Enterprise
-
Want to understand agentic commerce? This is a breakdown of the emerging stack and who does what. 𝟭. 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀 Models such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI provide the reasoning layer that allows agents to interpret instructions, plan actions and make decisions. Without this layer, there are no autonomous agents. 𝟮. 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 Providers such as AWS, Google Cloud, Cloudflare, Akash supply the compute and networking needed to run models and agents continuously. This is the infrastructure layer of the agent economy. 𝟯. 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 Frameworks like MCP and A2A allow developers to build agents that can call APIs, access services and coordinate tasks. This layer enables models to operate as agents. 𝟰. 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 Protocols such as Virtuals Protocol, Bittensor or Heurist allow agents to collaborate and coordinate with other agents rather than operating individually. These networks provide shared environments where agents can exchange tasks and services. 𝟱. 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 Before an agent can act, it must discover available services, APIs or resources. Tools like x402scan and Unicity Labs allow agents to discover APIs, services or payment endpoints across the ecosystem. 𝟲. 𝗜𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘆 & 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 Agents must prove who they are and whether they can be trusted. Protocols such as ERC-8004, Cred Protocol, AgentProof provide identity and and verifiable credentials so agents can transact securely. 𝟳. 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 Platforms like Stripe, Coinbase, Openx402, thirdweb connect agents to services, payments and workflows. They act as the execution layer that lets agents actually do things. 𝟴. 𝗪𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘀 & 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 Solutions such as Privy, MetaMask, Fireblocks, Coinbase Wallet allow agents to hold assets, manage keys and sign transactions. Technologies like ERC-4337 simplify account management so agents can transact programmatically. 𝟵. 𝗣𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 Infrastructure such as x402, Stripe, Visa, Crossmint, Moonpay enables automated payments and settlement. This is what allows agents to pay for services or receive payments automatically. 𝟭𝟬. 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 Networks like Base, Solana, Polygon, Avalanche, Arbitrum provide the settlement and execution environment where transactions are recorded. 𝟭𝟭. 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘀 Assets such as USDC and USDT provide programmable digital money that agents can move instantly across networks. For many agent transactions, stablecoins act as the settlement asset. 𝟭𝟮. 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲𝘀 Interfaces such as ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini are becoming the entry point where humans interact with agents and delegate tasks. These interfaces increasingly act as the control layer for agent activity. Opinions: my own, Graphic source: Artemis Analytics 𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐲 𝐧𝐞𝐰𝐬𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫: https://lnkd.in/dkqhnxdg
-
🚀 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐈 𝐀𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: 𝐁𝐞𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨 Just caught a fantastic session from AWS Developers: "We Need to Talk About AI Agent Architectures." Huge kudos to Morgan Willis for her brilliant breakdown of the universal principles needed to move AI agents from simple prototypes to robust, production-ready systems. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐢𝐭𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐨𝐟 "𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨-𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲" 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬: Many AI agent demos directly connect a client to the agent's runtime. This simplified model, while great for quick proofs-of-concept, lacks critical infrastructure for operational concerns like scalability, cost management, security, and reliability. It becomes a bottleneck in production. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐠𝐦: 𝐀𝐈 𝐀𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐧𝐭 The fundamental shift for production readiness is to view the 𝐀𝐈 𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝, 𝐧𝐨𝐧-𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧 𝐚 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫, 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦. This champions the principle of 𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐬. 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬: 1. 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐍𝐨𝐧-𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐋𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜: • 𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐋𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫𝐬: Handle predictable operations (user auth, data retrieval, routing, state management) via conventional backend services (microservices, serverless functions). • 𝐍𝐨𝐧-𝐃𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐞: The AI agent is reserved for advanced reasoning, natural language understanding, complex decision-making, and tool utilization. It's an intelligent engine invoked by deterministic layers when needed. 2. 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐋𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞: • 𝐀𝐏𝐈 𝐆𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐰𝐚𝐲/𝐄𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬: Primary entry point for routing, load balancing, and initial security. • 𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬: Orchestrate workflows, handle deterministic logic, interact with databases, and invoke the AI agent. • 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 & 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐋𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫𝐬: Implement robust security measures and governance policies for compliant AI operation. By embedding AI agents within a layered architecture, you gain the power of generative AI without sacrificing enterprise-grade stability and security. For anyone building or planning to build with AI agents, this video offers critical insights into designing architectures that truly scale and perform in production. It's a must-watch to elevate your understanding of agentic systems. Watch the full discussion here: https://lnkd.in/eyibDMgB #AWS #GenerativeAI #AmazonBedrock #AI
We Need to Talk About AI Agent Architectures
https://www.youtube.com/