Sustaining Interest in Work: A Neurodivergent Leader’s Guide to Engagement and Energy

In the evolving world of leadership, neurodivergent individuals are increasingly recognized for the unique ways they solve problems, drive innovation, and lead with authenticity. But while their contributions are invaluable, one often overlooked challenge is maintaining long-term interest in work—especially in roles that demand high levels of executive function, emotional labor, and conformity to traditional workplace norms.

For neurodivergent leaders, interest isn't merely a preference; it's often a prerequisite for engagement. The conventional advice to "push through" or "stay consistent" rarely addresses how neurodivergent brains actually sustain momentum. So, what does it look like to build a sustainable career path and leadership practice that keeps interest alive?

The Neurodivergent Experience of Interest and Engagement

Interest is not merely an emotional preference—it is a neurological driver of attention and executive functioning. For many neurodivergent people, particularly those with ADHD or autism, interest is a precondition for effective task initiation, sustained focus, and cognitive regulation (Barkley, 2012; Hupfeld et al., 2019).

ADHD researchers refer to this phenomenon as an interest-based nervous system, wherein motivation is driven more by novelty, urgency, and emotional resonance than by importance or long-term consequence (Dodson, 2011). Similarly, autistic individuals often experience intense engagement—known as hyperfocus—in areas of deep interest, while struggling with tasks that lack personal relevance or clarity (Grove et al., 2018).

When neurodivergent individuals hold leadership roles, they may bring extraordinary creativity and insight. However, they may also encounter disengagement when roles become overly routine, ambiguous, or socially exhausting—conditions often considered “normal” in leadership.

Why Interest Fades

For neurodivergent leaders, interest can wane for reasons that differ from neurotypical burnout. Some common triggers include:

• Lack of novelty or challenge – Tasks that are repetitive or lack intellectual challenge can lead to cognitive disengagement. For ADHDers, monotony reduces dopaminergic stimulation, while autistic individuals may disengage from tasks that lack structure or deviate from their interests (Antshel et al., 2011; Russell et al., 2019).
• Poor alignment with values or purpose – Many neurodivergent people report that meaningful, purpose-driven work sustains their attention better than external rewards or hierarchy (Climie & Henley, 2018). When leadership tasks begin to feel disconnected from their core values, interest—and energy—declines rapidly.
• Executive function overload – Neurodivergent leaders often manage high cognitive loads due to co-occurring executive functioning challenges such as time-blindness, decision fatigue, or working memory strain (Brown, 2021). These deficits are exacerbated in unstructured environments or in leadership roles that require frequent task-switching.
• Masking and camouflaging – Leaders often feel pressure to maintain a professional facade. Neurodivergent masking—suppressing behaviors or needs to appear neurotypical—has been linked to burnout, anxiety, and long-term disengagement (Hull et al., 2020; Botha & Frost, 2020).

Rather than trying to "fix" attention through productivity hacks designed for neurotypicals, neurodivergent leaders often benefit from shifting the paradigm entirely—centering curiosity, designing for sustainability, and reimagining what leadership looks like.

Strategies to Sustain Interest at Work

To maintain long-term engagement, neurodivergent leaders benefit from an approach that supports their brain’s unique needs. The following strategies are grounded in psychological research and neurodiversity-affirming practices.

1. Design for Dopamine, Not Discipline

In a traditional model, success relies on self-discipline and routine. But for neurodivergent brains, motivation is far more tied to stimulation and novelty. The solution? Build workflows that feed the brain the dopamine it needs to stay engaged.

Tactics:

• Break tasks into smaller units and celebrate progress.
• Use tools like Pomodoro timers, visual trackers (e.g., Trello, Kanban boards), or habit-building apps.
• Create sensory-friendly workspaces with music, movement breaks, fidgets, or lighting that energizes.

🔧 Try This: Use a timer like Pomofocus or Flow Club and “gamify” admin tasks with self-imposed rewards.

Research Insight: Intrinsic motivation, when paired with autonomy and immediate feedback, has been shown to significantly enhance performance in ADHD individuals (Deci & Ryan, 2000; Zentall & Zentall, 1983).

2. Center Work Around Your ‘Why’

When interest starts to wane, reconnecting with purpose can be a powerful motivator. Many neurodivergent leaders are vision-driven. They care about justice, innovation, or transformation—not just tasks on a checklist.

Tactics:

• Regularly review how your current projects align with your values or long-term goals.
• Set “purpose checkpoints” where you reassess what still resonates—and what doesn’t.
• Be open to redefining success on your own terms (e.g., impact vs. output).

🧭 Try This: “Does this project align with what I most care about—and if not, how can I pivot or delegate?”

Research Insight: Self-determination theory shows that autonomy, competence, and relatedness are key to sustained motivation—especially for individuals with learning differences (Ryan & Deci, 2017).

3. Build in Novelty and Challenge

Stimulation is essential to sustaining interest. Autistic and ADHD minds often thrive when presented with systems-level challenges, abstract thinking, or deep dives into learning. Without these, boredom—and burnout—can quickly set in.

Tactics:

• Incorporate “innovation time” into your weekly schedule.
• Propose new initiatives or cross-functional collaborations.
• Build or join think tanks, mastermind groups, or reading circles.

💡 Try This: Set up “Innovation Fridays” or passion project slots to explore side ideas within work hours.

Research Insight: Hyperfocus in ADHD and autism is associated with elevated task performance in areas of personal interest and perceived challenge (Ashinoff & Abu-Akel, 2019; Meppelink et al., 2016).

4. Limit Masking and Increase Authenticity

Many neurodivergent professionals spend years camouflaging their true selves—suppressing stims, mimicking social behaviors, or avoiding disclosure. This masking is not only exhausting but can also erode genuine interest and identity.

Authenticity, by contrast, can restore energy and deepen connection to work.

Tactics:

• Normalize neurodivergence in your workplace—share openly (if safe), or advocate for inclusive design.
• Identify your personal “tells” of masking and create space to unmask (e.g., stim breaks, quiet time).
• Set boundaries that protect your sensory and cognitive needs.

🗣️ Speak Up: “To stay engaged, I need clear expectations and time to focus deeply. Here’s what helps.”

Research Insight: Persistent masking has been linked to negative mental health outcomes, including depression and exhaustion (Cage & Troxell-Whitman, 2019).

5. Honor Natural Rhythms and Rest

Neurodivergent leaders often experience nonlinear energy patterns. Creativity might spike at night. Focus might be highest after movement. Instead of forcing yourself into 9–5 molds, experiment with when and how you work best.

Tactics:

• Track your energy and focus cycles for 2–4 weeks to identify peak performance windows.
• Design “deep work” slots during peak times and reserve low-focus periods for admin or rest.
• Take recovery days when interest dips, rather than pushing through into burnout.

🌙 Try This: Track your energy and focus patterns over two weeks. Design your week around your peaks, not societal expectations.

Research Insight: Flexible scheduling and task autonomy have been associated with increased productivity and job satisfaction among neurodivergent professionals (Hendricks, 2010; Austin & Pisano, 2017).

Redefining Leadership Through a Neurodivergent Lens

Sustaining interest in work is not about forcing compliance to a broken system—it’s about reimagining leadership through a neurodivergent-affirming lens. This includes redefining success not as constant output, but as authentic, values-driven engagement over time.

Organizations benefit when neurodivergent leaders thrive. These leaders often model radical transparency, adaptive problem-solving, and empathy-based decision-making. But to keep showing up fully, they must be allowed to lead in ways that respect their cognitive diversity—not in spite of it, but because of it.

References

Antshel, K. M., Zhang-James, Y., & Faraone, S. V. (2011). The comorbidity of ADHD and autism spectrum disorder. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 13(10), 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.2013.840417

Ashinoff, B. K., & Abu-Akel, A. (2019). Hyperfocus: The evolution of a concept. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 11, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-018-0278-4

Austin, R. D., & Pisano, G. P. (2017). Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 96–103.

Barkley, R. A. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. Guilford Press.

Botha, M., & Frost, D. M. (2020). Extending the minority stress model to understand mental health experiences of autistic people. Clinical Psychology Review, 82, 101923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101923

Brown, T. E. (2021). Smart but stuck: Emotions in teens and adults with ADHD. John Wiley & Sons.

Cage, E., & Troxell-Whitman, Z. (2019). Understanding the reasons, contexts and costs of camouflaging for autistic adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49, 1899–1911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-03878-x

Climie, E. A., & Henley, L. (2018). Working with children with ADHD: A strengths-based perspective. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 59(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000145

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Dodson, W. (2011). The ADHD brain: A model of differential attention. ADDitude Magazine. https://www.additudemag.com

Grove, R., Hoekstra, R. A., Wierda, M., & Begeer, S. (2018). Special interests and subjective wellbeing in autistic adults. Autism Research, 11(5), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1931

Hendricks, D. (2010). Employment and adults with autism spectrum disorders: Challenges and strategies for success. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 32(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2010-0502

Hull, L., Petrides, K. V., Allison, C., Smith, P., Baron-Cohen, S., Lai, M. C., & Mandy, W. (2020). “Putting on My Best Normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(7), 2209–2222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03980-6

Hupfeld, K. E., Abagis, T. R., & Shah, P. (2019). Living “in the zone”: Hyperfocus in adult ADHD. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 11, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-018-0278-4

Meppelink, R., de Bruin, A., & Bögels, S. M. (2016). The role of repetitive behaviors in anxiety reduction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01339

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Russell, G., Mandy, W., Elliott, D., White, R., Pittwood, T., & Ford, T. (2019). Selection bias on intellectual ability in autism research: A cross-sectional review and meta-analysis. Molecular Autism, 10, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-019-0260-x

Tuckman, B. W., & Monetti, D. M. (2011). Educational psychology. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Zentall, S. S., & Zentall, T. R. (1983). Optimal stimulation: A model of disordered activity and performance in normal and deviant children. Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 446–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.446