Returning to office at Microsoft, three days a week

Returning to office at Microsoft, three days a week

Today, many of us in the Puget Sound area returned to the Microsoft office three days a week. As this new rhythm takes shape, I wanted to share what I’ve been thinking about.

Article content
Welcome back to the office goodie bag

When COVID hit in March 2020, work didn’t just change where it happened. It changed how opportunity showed up. Over the years that followed, the question stopped being remote versus in office and became something more nuanced: how do we use both well to do our best work?

Remote work kept things moving. It expanded what was possible and removed proximity as a prerequisite for opportunity. It gave me room to move into a new career in marketing, build confidence, and find my voice as a default introvert. Some of my biggest career moments, including launching Copilot Studio happened from my home office.

I was hired into Marketing through Microsoft Teams interviews and moved to the United States 4.5 years ago on an exception flight that was about 10% full, arriving to a closed campus and meeting my team through a screen. I remember picturing the day we’d collaborate in person, whiteboard ideas, learn by osmosis, and feel the energy of incredibly talented people working together.

While the campus has been open again for some time, with updated flexible work expectations, Microsoft is now setting a clearer baseline: three days a week in the office, starting in Puget Sound, with an emphasis on making in-person time intentional and impactful. That framing matters to me. It acknowledges we’re not trying to rewind the clock. We’re trying to take the best of what we learned in a remote-first world and combine it with the benefits of being together.

I’ve already felt the upside. The brief hallway conversations. Talking through blockers in real time. Whiteboarding instead of scheduling another call. Things that can take much longer in a fully remote setting.

Article content
Welcome back + Clippy in the office.

Here’s what I’m noticing: I’m genuinely excited to spend more time working with my team in person, and I’m also mindful of how we thoughtfully adapt the remote habits we’ve built over the years to an office setting.

With remote work, we optimized our calendars. We stack meetings. We remove friction. Going back means rethinking how we use time, how we plan our days, and how intentional we are when we’re together. It also means accounting for commutes and even walking between meeting rooms.

I’m excited to take what we’ve learned over the last few years and be deliberate about how we split the week to support different kinds of work. I’m thinking of it like a design problem. Each week includes three kinds of work:

  • Build: deep focus and protected uninterrupted work.
  • Collaborate: live decision making, co-creation, whiteboards.
  • Learn: mentorship and relationship building.

My plan is to use in-person days for the work that benefits from proximity and protect remote time for focus.

I’m curious how others have approached the shift from remote-first habits into a more hybrid rhythm. What have habits have you decided to keep, and what are you intentionally changing?

For those interested, Microsoft shared more context on our updated flexible work approach here: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2025/09/09/flexible-work-update/

You can learn about the campus here: From Redmond to the world & LinkedIn post about the campus.


Do the Connector Buses still run around Seattle? They must make return to work easier? When I worked at Redmond, and lived on 24th Ave (connector stop on my street) - it was a no brainer, with free wifi. That was before COVID - how much has wfh impacted the Connector offering?

My two cents.. Return to Office assumes presence is a good proxy for contribution, but in many knowledge jobs the real bottleneck is workflow (priorities, incentives, decision rights), so an attendance rule can raise costs without increasing real output, some organizations drift toward controlism rather than effectiveness.

Very refreshing to read this, Jack. Thanks for sharing. On a side note - I have a suggestion and as I’m not able to send DM for some reason, let me put it here in comments if I may. I think if you rename your newsletter from “my learning journey” to say something like.. “Jack Rowbottom’ learning journey”, People might instantly recognise this more in some other places on LinkedIn.. for example, if there is a newsletter list and it doesn’t show your name, then all they see is ‘my learning journey’ with no insights into who this person is, but if you say your name in there, they’ll be able to instantly recognise newsletter without even looking at an article because they know your name, which is your brand. Adding your name in there will also make it their POV rather than your POV if that makes any sense. Just a suggestion & I hope I didn’t overstep my boundary here. I couldn’t resist sending this to you because I love your content and insights.

Great read ,Jack! Very good reflection and insights!

culture gets tested in moments like this.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Jack Rowbotham

Others also viewed

Explore content categories