The Relationship Between Data Governance and Data Quality

The Relationship Between Data Governance and Data Quality

We often talk about Data Governance and Data Quality in the same breath. This can lead to confusion, with some people assuming they are the same thing when actually, they’re not. However, they’re closely related, and in my experience, they work best when managed by the same team.

Understanding Data Quality and Data Governance

Data Quality is about making sure that data is good enough to use. It’s a straightforward concept, if data is incorrect, incomplete or inconsistent, it can’t support business decisions effectively.

Data Governance, on the other hand, is about creating a structured framework of roles, responsibilities, and processes to manage data.

Although they’re separate disciplines within data management, they are very much intertwined. When you try to improve data quality without governance, you usually end up applying short-term fixes rather than solving the root cause of data issues.

Why You Can’t Have Good Data Quality Without Governance

From my experience, many organisations focus on Data Quality long before they consider Data Governance. After all, it’s easy to understand the need for clean, reliable data. The problem is that without Data Governance, Data Quality efforts are often tactical rather than strategic.

For example, businesses might:

  • Regularly fix errors in reports but do not address the source of the errors.
  • Use automated data cleansing when loading data into analytics systems.
  • Have teams manually correct data every month, quarter, or year.

These approaches may make data usable in the short term, but they do not prevent problems from recurring. The same errors will keep happening, and this is where Data Governance comes in.

Data Governance establishes:

  • Roles and responsibilities so that specific people (Data Owners and Data Stewards) are accountable for data quality.
  • Processes to resolve data issues at the source, rather than just fixing them repeatedly at the point the data is used (one of the most valuable Data Governance processes, in my opinion, is data quality issue resolution. This identifies and fixes the root causes of poor data quality rather than applying endless fixes).

Why Data Quality and Data Governance Should Be Managed by the Same Team

Because of their close relationship, Data Quality and Data Governance should be managed together. When separate teams handle them, challenges arise. I have seen organisations where the Data Quality team is focused on fixing errors while a Data Governance team tries to implement a structured framework of definitions and roles, and responsibilities. In such cases, business users tend to bypass Data Governance efforts entirely and go directly to the Data Quality team when they need a quick fix. Their immediate concern is solving their problem in the moment rather than considering long-term improvements.

When the same team is responsible for both Data Quality and Data Governance, they are able to provide short-term fixes while simultaneously working on long-term solutions, ensuring that immediate needs are met without neglecting the bigger picture. It’s also great because they can demonstrate the true value of Data Governance by proactively solving recurring data issues rather than simply reacting to them.

Moving From Reactive to Proactive Data Management

Without Data Governance, organisations are stuck in a cycle of fixing the same problems repeatedly. With Data Governance in place, they can shift to a proactive approach:

  • Data issues are resolved at the source, reducing ongoing fixes.
  • Business users understand their role in maintaining data quality.
  • Data Owners and Stewards take responsibility for preventing and fixing errors.

Many organisations still manually cleanse data before they can use it. However, this is a waste of time and resources and is something which Data Governance eliminates.

Final Thoughts

If your organisation is focusing on Data Quality without Data Governance, you are likely applying temporary fixes rather than permanent solutions. While Data Governance and Data Quality are distinct disciplines, they should work together, ideally within the same team, to ensure sustainable data improvements.

Originally published on www.nicolaaskham.com

If you enjoyed this article, don't forget to visit my LinkedIn profile and turn on post notifications (just hit the bell!). This way, you'll never miss out on my latest post.

Article content


Excellent point. Data Quality and Data Governance go together always. Data Quality can be the driver and it takes support from Data Governance on people and processes..

Excellent piece, Nicola 👏 We couldn’t agree more: Data Governance is what makes Data Quality repeatable and scalable. At Engrafo, we see this every day—organisations are drowning in tactical fixes because there's no clear ownership or root cause analysis. That’s why a data catalog and lineage tool don’t just document metadata; they map responsibilities and surface quality issues at the source. Governance and quality aren’t just connected—they should be inseparable. Thanks for continuing to shine a light on this important topic.

Like
Reply

Thanks for sharing, Nicola, in my view data quality is a sub-set of data governance. As you rightly point out data quality improvement initiatives can be seen as one off initiatives, whereas under the umbrella of data governance, they become continuous improvement initiatives. It’s like the difference between being a noun and a verb, DQ is often the noun, the name place or thing, whereas governance is the thing that gives the noun action and continuous meaning.

Thanks! Great article Nicola. I can just agree on everything. We as insightful have though a great responsibility to explain Data Governance and Data Quality in as a simple way as possible. It doesn’t help that much if I and my closest colleagues and a few more in IT understands it, or we do have impressive and detailed (complicated) multi page slide-decks about it. To succeed I think we need to have an easy to understand communicable common message on what Data Governance and Data Quality is, so we can reach out to everyone within the organization helping them get it and live it. Nicola you’re really a source and inspiration to make Data Governance easy to understand so it can happened. Thanks!

Thanks for sharing. I believe that while everyone strives for high-quality data, its essential foundation is effective Data Governance. Without it, achieving that goal is simply not possible.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Nicola Askham

Others also viewed

Explore content categories