Missive on Men

Missive on Men

If you follow me on Social Media or in life, you have come to understand that much of my perspective is based on systemic thinking and patterns. Even my career choice of working in Radar, Sonar, Light and Sound supports the constant motion and cyclical nature of, well EVERYTHING. I am not alone it that perspective. I believe “intuition” (women’s or not) is the recognition of patterns and predicting that a similar systemic pattern will result in similar outcome even if they are literally dissimilar. In my career, I often “see” things before other’s see them. It has made me extremely useful in crisis management and extremely annoying during the steady state. It doesn’t make me a mind reader and I don’t see the future; I simply recognize a likely outcome given the pattern. And that in spite of our best efforts in education, cultural engineering, and societal standardization (politics if you will), if a characteristic or basic human instinct drives certain behaviors, those behaviors will reappear generation after generation it is part of the life cycle and doesn’t change over time.

I know that is quite a preamble and I have been meaning to write this article for some time. I know that what I am about to communicate is not going to go over very well in our polarized society. I also know that when I offer systemic observations, people will refute it with a real example. Maybe even a personal or emotional one. I am not being dismissive, it is just that if it doesn’t align with the most likely outcome, over time, that example may be an exception (Special Cause) or an artifact another sub-system or dependent system (Normal Cause). If something is not going to change over time, then society will continuously fail to manage it despite social and legal constructs. The purpose of this article is to share four aspects of men that are not going to change over time so perhaps the strategy for society is to leverage these characteristics instead of trying to change them (because you are going to fail). I should also add that I have experienced this with All Races and Sexual Orientations of men, so I am not sure if it is the balls or hormones or some other factor, perhaps that will require study.

#1 Male Bonding: When men meet, the first thing they do in their conversations is seek out common interests. It literally can be anything: Cars, sports, hobbies, career, education, favorite songs from rock to Broad Way, a million other topics… but they are generally things that they can do together or discuss in depth. If they know someone else present who shares a found interest, they pull them into the conversation immediately. “He Bob! You gotta come over here and meet Fred!” …. This is the gathering stage. They don’t exclude anyone from this process but if no one shares your interest, you may feel like you are on the outside looking in. I guess a question you can ask yourself if you don’t like this ritual is: Are you actively and aggressively seeking common ground or if you are not, what is your objective?

#2 Busting Chops: As mentioned in #1 above, the purpose of gathering is to do stuff together. The result is clustering together in armies to protect their common interests. Maybe way back in the day, this clustering in armies was designed more for protecting the village than sharing a bottle of scotch, round of golf, Going to see Rocky Horror Picture Show for the billionth time, or tailgating at a football game, but it is the same instinctive behavior that is not going to change. Back to the busting of chops. The purpose of this is to test the hierarchy. It is a filtering process which test resiliency as well as intelligence, not book smarts maybe but the ability to contribute, be useful and have humility. There will be some who are more dominant than others, but leaders emerge based on skills and strengths. This is not for the faint of heart or the thin skinned. Again, no one is excluded but people exclude or excuse themselves from the ritual If they can’t stand the heat. The best example of this was in the Movie “Remember the Titans” the Black and White (young men) came together in a ritual of “Your Momma Jokes”. Busting Chops is a unifying process that builds trust and defines the hierarchy and isn’t going away. So, tune up your wit.

#3 Man ‘splaining: Once the Clustering and sorting, hierarchy and trust has been completed, Men focus on helping each other and building the skills of each other. If someone has expertise, they explain and teach that to other people, they also accept advice and learnings from others to strengthen themselves  and make the “army” stronger. Expertise is theoretical until it is demonstrated. Making suggestions to the group without taking ownership or having past results is often ignored, even If you are correct. Someone else with a track record can make the same suggestion and it gets heard. It is frustrating but results matter. Experienced Men man ‘splain the crap out of everything to each other and it can be quite annoying, but I have to be honest, when I hear someone complain about being ignored or man ‘spained to, I don’t think, wow that is horrible that you are being singled out. I think wow, welcome to the freakin’ club!

#4 Fixing Mistakes: Men make a lot of mistakes and unfortunately hurt people along the way. There is not a positive spin if you are left in their wake, but Men usually don’t make the same mistake twice. They fix what is broken. Often in the next relationship or the next cluster.  I have seen this behavior in my own personal life and that of my friends and family. But I have learned that it is not because of malice, it is inherent perception that fixing the future is more important than fixing the past. The inability to operate within the #1, #2, and #3 example above is a factor in my view when men fail. I saw a study in 2000 when I was taking executive training that said 97% of the Corporate CEOs in the Fortune 100 were with their first spouse.  Success in relationships comes from success in the rituals of being males. There are now strong signs that men who engage in mass shootings are growing up without fathers or access to the various male rituals stated here.

Well, I warned you. Heady stuff and maybe it even pissed you off a little. But instead of using social engineering and politics to change men, maybe we should understand what is working and why, what is not working and why and discuss these topics with honesty and an open mind by measuring their impact on society vs the impact on individuals. Because we can’t change things that nature gives us and every time we try, we make things worse. We can only manage what nature gives us and if we are smart, we can leverage them as well to make life better and safer for everyone.

From a personal perspective only, I was keenly aware of male bonding ("best friends") in high school then in college.  Conversely, I was curious about what I perceived as female non-bonding in the same period.  It puzzled me.  The girl friend and eventually wife of a best friend back then questioned me.  She said that Jack and I seemed to have more fun together than she and Jack did.  Her observation was that we laughed more together than she and Jack did.  Of course that struck me as curious; maybe there was a difference in their combined sense of humor.  After many years and two kids, they divorced.  After 3 kids and lots of laughs, my wife and I are still married, and still laughing.  Keep thinking.

Like
Reply

I believe the saying, if you are not at the table, you are on the menu. Relationships and Humanization are the key to any successful team. It is really difficult for remote teams to work together and never meet or have real human interactions. If your only interaction is work related and remote, parties objectify each other quickly, regardless of gender or any other dimension of diversity. I have experienced that, like you mentioned. We can't misinterpret (or assume) the cause. My experience at IBM was that I needed to get to know everyone personally, even if I could never meet them face to face. Team leaders of remote teams have to work twice as hard because they have to manage the human relationships as much as the content. _ and yes, there are sexist dickheads in the world and sometimes it is hard to tell the difference between them being a jerk and the overall situation being poorly managed. I recommend setting up Skype or one on ones with people. Find a reason to talk about the project and work in some personal stuff. The Red Sox are always an ice breaker! 

Like
Reply

Interesting article, Ben. I see this, and can understand much of what you are saying. Question to you is this: For those who work on remote teams, and especially those working with women, some men are far more successful at "bonding" with women, where others fail horribly. Sometimes the dynamic is very different for those who are "drop-ins" to the team from a distance especially when it comes to women, and they often leave serious debris in their wake. They tend to come off as sexist jerks. Any thoughts on that?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Ben Gibson

  • Christmas Missive 2019

    I don’t go to church very often, but I always enjoy Christmas Eve. It is a tradition of sorts.

    1 Comment
  • Requiem For A Leader

    The year 1998 may conjure up images of colorful iMacs, an obscure search engine called Google, the falling Starr of…

    30 Comments
  • A Story of Kodak Prosper

    I always looked forward to the day when the Research Labs at Kodak would open their doors and we would get to see what…

    2 Comments
  • Five Lessons From Five Women

    We are all a collection of our experiences and the older we get, the bigger our collection. It would be naïve to think…

    3 Comments
  • Missive on Methodists

    The United Methodist Church recently voted to ban gay clergy and same sex marriage. It was not unanimous by any means…

    1 Comment
  • The Lens of Knowledge is Concave

    The lens of knowledge is concave, the lens of experience is convex. Knowledge spreads and expands the light to endless…

    3 Comments
  • Regarding Abortion

    There may be no greater controversy today than the current trend for red states that got redder in the last election to…

    1 Comment
  • UPDATE: Nomination of Donald R. Brush to the CNY Bowling Hall of Fame

    It is not very often I get the opportunity to UPDATE an article because of new, relevant information, but sometimes the…

    3 Comments
  • Steelers Lament

    Well LinkedIn, congratulations! Your feature for writing articles has survived as my default platform for blogging…

    2 Comments
  • Christmas Missive 2018

    The Hope of Christmas 2018 Are these the worst of times or the best of times? An interesting philosophical question and…

    3 Comments

Others also viewed

Explore content categories