The many levels of data management maturity
Image Wikipedia under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

The many levels of data management maturity

After managing scientific data sets for many years, I have taken a little time to reflect on the maturity and rigour with which these data are managed by various organisations that I have interacted with.

To this end I wish to suggest a 4 part scale for the so called 'maturity' of data management. I hope this helps those tasked with data management think about where they are in their evolution or journey.

Thoughts and comments welcome.

[Level 0] No use of controlled vocabularies or other data standards.

The wild west of data management.

[Level 1] Full and appropriate adoption of controlled vocabularies.

Master data recognised and used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_vocabulary

[Level 2] Full and appropriate use of relevant ontologies.

Master data recognised and uses relationships between data terms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology

[Level 3] Full and appropriate adoption of minimum information standards.

A relevant blend of ontologies for each application domain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_information_standard

[Level 4] Full and appropriate adoption of FAIR data principles.

Well described data and metadata that is able to be found, accessed, integrated or reused.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAIR_data

Christopher Southan

Honorary Professor at the University of Edinburgh and owner of TW2Informatics Consulting

2y

Cond be kind of pricey to hold data collegial management discourse in the Savoy these days. You buying the drinks Mark?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics