The Deep Tech Conundrum

The Deep Tech Conundrum

In one of my conversation with a deep tech founder. He mentioned that he often found himself self in a Catch-22 situation.

On one hand, he was told that investing in deep tech can produce outsized returns. Yet on the other, investors seemed risk-averse, preferring diversified bets over potentially breakthrough innovations.

I realized that, the entire deep tech investment space seems full of paradoxes.

🎢 The Risk-Return Tradeoff

Venture capital has traditionally focused on finding those rare companies with the potential for 10-100x returns - what is well known phenomeon called "following a power law".

Historically, this lead VCs to bet big on semiconductors, biotech, or software. The hits may be rare, but can be huge.

However, recently many VCs have drifted towards more distributed returns models. In other words, spreading bets across many startups rather than concentrating on a few high-risk, high-upside companies.

🔮 So while deep tech innovation is often stereotyped as exceptionally risky, avoiding it brings a different danger - that your portfolio gets disrupted anyway by the next wave of deep tech.

🚫 The Quest for Perfection

Another perception is that deep tech takes longer to build and commercialize. And indeed, this extended gestation period does require patience from investors.

The timelines for deep tech unicorns have compressed dramatically. 📈

In fact, the median deep tech unicorn takes only (as per a data shared by someone from VC ecosystem):

$100 million capital AND 5 years To reach that magical $1 billion valuation. Hardly different than other startups!

The key is avoiding the temptation to endlessly refine your technology before taking it to market.

As they say, "perfect is the enemy of good."

💰 Capital Efficiency

Finally, I had assumed deep tech inherently required massive capital support over long timeframes.

Yet we're seeing Indian deep tech innovators get to key milestones with just a fraction of the investment needed in Western markets. 💸

And once their tech is built, the heightened barriers to entry often make customer acquisition more efficient too.

So rather than deep pools of capital, what deep tech startups truly need is patient, understanding investors to see them through the voyage of bringing their innovations to life.

💰 The IP Paradox

On one hand, deep tech startups are often advised to aggressively protect their innovations through patents and other forms of IP protection. This is seen as crucial for maintaining a competitive edge and attracting investors who want to see defensible technology.

However, there's a flip side to this coin. As your deep tech startup becomes more successful and your innovations gain traction in the market, you may find yourself increasingly targeted by IP infringement. Paradoxically, your success can make you more vulnerable to copycats and competitors who want to capitalize on your breakthroughs.

This creates a challenging situation:

  1. If you don't protect your IP, you risk losing your competitive advantage.
  2. If you do protect it, you may still face infringement as you become more successful, potentially leading to costly legal battles.

The key to navigating this paradox lies in striking a balance:

  • Develop a robust IP strategy that protects your core innovations.
  • Be prepared to enforce your IP rights, but also be strategic about which battles to fight.
  • Consider alternative strategies like rapid innovation cycles or maintaining trade secrets for certain aspects of your technology.
  • Build strong relationships with customers and partners, as brand loyalty and network effects can provide additional protection beyond legal measures.

Ultimately, the IP paradox underscores the importance of a holistic approach to protecting and commercializing deep tech innovations. It's not just about having the strongest patents, but also about smart market strategies, continuous innovation, and building a ecosystem around your technology.

What other paradoxes have you experienced on your deep tech journey? I'd love to hear them! 🤝

🏂Barry M.

everwoodinteractive2K followers

1y

The tech is there, just the investors are only listening to the big boys. The conundrum is the big boys want full financial control(I am using the AR/VR field here as a talking point)of the digital economy. This field is bigger than every big tech company in the planet. Due to complexity of the real-time data that will be required to feed this system. Cause the big boys have majority share of the current digital market. This inturns makes the clever small inventors invisible to potential investors.

Like
Reply
Nick White

Tangible IP2K followers

1y

There is nothing new in this space. So called Deep Tech is what we used to do before the Shallow Tech era. We are just reverting to the norm after a generation and just need to relearn the rulebook.

Great insights… thanks for sharing !

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Govind Kedia

Others also viewed

Explore content categories