A Crazy Idea to Save the World
“New York City” 12/14/2017 by Bob Young

A Crazy Idea to Save the World

I want to give everybody a job. And you can help.

History is changed by crazy ideas. The story of humankind is the story of doing the impossible. Yesteryear’s impossible achievements engendered amazement, and then they were taken for granted, and then they became old-fashioned, and finally they became obsolete – replaced by newer, more amazing, “crazy” ideas.

Well, I have a crazy idea. That’s not to say it’s a world-changer. It may just be crazy. So, how do we tell the difference between a crazy, world-changing idea and one that’s just plain crazy?

By attempting to breathe life into it.

If we never try to bring an idea into reality, it’s DOA – Dead On Arrival.

But, if the results of an idea would be utterly fantastic – if the results would do amazing things like reduce poverty, and give people meaningful, productive work – and we didn’t try to bring that idea to life – well, it’s a kind of murder. Murdering an idea. We won’t go to jail for murdering an idea. But maybe we should.

What if the idea can clean up the environment, improve healthcare, and put food in hungry bellies? If we murder that kind of idea by choosing not to even try, doesn’t that make us complicit in the future suffering we didn’t prevent?

So anyway, I have an idea. The idea comes in two closely related parts.

Part One: I want to launch a thousand enterprises. Ten thousand. Maybe thousands more.

In this part of the idea, those of us with the creative resources to do so start businesses designed to employ as many people as possible while creating as little profit as possible. To employ as many people as possible, we eschew automation in favor of human energy. We employ people instead of buying machines. We create jobs that don’t require a college degree, or even literacy. We let people do stuff. And we pay them a living wage to do it.

Sew on buttons. Cut fabric. Fill bottles. Pump gas. Put products in packages and seal them up. Count things. Turn cranks. Pull levers. And, yes, type and click on keyboards.

The goal is not to make a profit. Not to pull money out of the company. The goal is to pay as many people as possible, and when a surplus develops, we spend it on hiring more people to do the things.

Part Two: I want to change the world’s mind about paying the lowest possible price.

We’ve already seen that people will pay more for products that align with their values. For example, people pay more for organic foods. Or Girl Scout Cookies.

You know, those Girl Scout Cookies you buy every year are no bargain. Compare the price per ounce of Girl Scout Cookies with the price of, say, Keebler Fudge Stripes. The thing is, we pay more for Girl Scout Cookies because of our values. We think that teaching our youth about handling money, and project management, and marketing, and commercial social skills, are all things that are worth the price.

Well, that’s what we need to do with human enterprise. Effort. Work. We need to place a higher value on it. It needs to matter to us that we pay people for doing actual productive work instead of paying them a welfare check.

We need to stop valuing machines more than people. We need to stop valuing mass production more than hand-made. Instead of products that say, “Made in USA,” we need products that say, “Made by Jamie.” We need to stop making education a barrier to employment, and instead say, “Here’s something you can do, and I’ll pay you to do it.”

And we need to buy the products and services that are the fruit of human effort, energy, will, and drive.

We need to make jobs, not take them away.

I know, I know. It’s a crazy idea. To create a workplace where people, lots of people, can thrive, instead of creating a machine space overseen by a computer monitored from out-of-state.

I’m trying to breathe life into my idea here. I’m trying to nurture this baby, this embryo, really, and create a new way of viewing and valuing people and money, work and productivity.

I need your help. Here’s how you do it. Here’s how you change the world.

1.      Start a business, one that’s based on humans doing things.

2.      If you already own a business, ask yourself how many machines you could replace with people.

3.      Pay a living wage, to everyone you employ, for every kind of job. Minimum wage is not a living wage anywhere in America, so you’ll have to do much better than that.

4.      Business income is for paying wages, not for paying shareholders.

5.      Find incredible joy and satisfaction in watching the number of lives you improve grow year by year, as you hire more people, and sustain more families.

Here’s a name for this idea, because people like having names for things. I’m calling it the Pax Terra Business Model. The idea is free for the taking. You don’t owe me a thing. Just go run a business using the Pax Terra Business Model, and that will be my reward.

--Bob Young

(Originally published on my blog on July 18, 2018)

Bob Korzeniowski

anonymous employer5K followers

4y

" I want to change the world’s mind about paying the lowest possible price." The reason we have this mindset is because people haven't gotten a raise in real terms since the 1970's. https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/ OK, cost of living keeps rising. But companies say "cheap out on raises" People are then forced to make hard decisions when it comes to spending money. They gotta be VERY price conscious. It is a downward spiral. Companies cheap out on raises. People cut back. Profits fall. Companies cheap out further on raises. People cut back..... "Business income is for paying wages, not for paying shareholders." Interesting, but I disagree. Business income is for paying STAKEHOLDERS - and I only see two stakeholders - owners and employees. If someone starts and runs a business they also work and deserve to be paid. The business owners running the companies you suggest also deserve to be paid. This is not charity. This is justice. This idea doesn't fit in capitalism, and it doesn't fit in socialism/communism. But it does fit in distributism, an economic system that fits with Catholic values. See Rerum Novarum and G.K. Chesterton's writings on distributism. For example, this is working in the real world: we have companies that are employee run that are wildly successfully. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/051316/6-successful-companies-are-employeeowned.asp Winco foods, a company in my state, is employee owned and their employees are very well taken care of.

Like
Reply
Tim Bateson

Slaughter and May1K followers

5y

Thought provoking article, Bob. It got me thinking about the current nature of work itself; particularly whether there might be any implicit premises to your article and whether they are necessarily immovables. E.g. what if, instead of needing more jobs (which I suspect might implicitly mean attempting to increase the total number of hours worked per year, in aggregate?), the average person could have the same quality of life by working fewer hours at a higher hourly rate than they do today? I suggest this as (1) the total number of hours worked in the US has not risen in line with either population growth or economic growth over the last 20+ years, largely due to automation; and (2) the automation trend is likely to not only continue, but accelerate, over the next generation. This is likely to lead to an ever-widening wealth gap (e.g. Gini coefficient), with wealth concentrated into the hands of a ever smaller number of people. Might guaranteed minimum income or universal basic income schemes play a part here? E.g. rather than trying to reverse the trend in automation, which seems like an unstoppable force, instead create the structures necessary for the average person to share in the economic benefits that automation brings?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Bob Young

  • The A Priori Assumptions of Modern Information Systems Architecture

    Today’s information systems architects start with three a priori assumptions. Everything they do is based on the belief…

    7 Comments
  • VPNs Don’t Hide Your Location

    The title isn’t intended to be provocative or clickbait. It’s simply the truth, in spite of the misleading advertising…

    10 Comments
  • Identifying the Real Problem

    The problem that you’re wrestling with is seldom the real problem. Finding the root makes all the difference.

    3 Comments
  • The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Learning

    I’m going to take you on a brief intellectual journey through the history of information storage and retrieval from…

    15 Comments
  • Physical Security for Alarm Systems

    Your alarm system provides physical security for your building – but what protects the alarm system? Introduction…

    7 Comments
  • Becoming a Leader, and Teaching Leadership

    There is a theory of cognition that holds that understanding is inseparable from language. Einstein exemplified this…

    3 Comments
  • Sales Tips From A Multi-Million Dollar Buyer

    Do you want to learn how to be a top-tier sales producer? Do you want to be an expert at new business development? I'm…

    6 Comments
  • How To Handle Criticism

    A friend of mine just confided that she is sometimes wounded by the words and attitudes of the parents of her students.…

    4 Comments
  • How a Common Corporate Policy Promotes Data Theft

    Securing your data requires a new way of thinking about your data. CEOs: I'm going to tell you what you want, and then…

    1 Comment
  • The Marketing Abuse of Artificial Intelligence

    For years, “artificial intelligence” meant processing information like the human brain. Not any more.

Others also viewed

Explore content categories