This is one of the most consequential pieces of IP development we've done...excited that The Hackett Group has launched AI World Class Benchmarks for the Agentic Enterprise - a new standard for measuring how AI and agentic workflows can fundamentally reshape enterprise performance, and a way for clients to 'future-proof' their service delivery model and ambition levels. The benchmarks extend Hackett’s Digital World Class framework to quantify the impact of GenAI and agentic workflows across 16 end‑to‑end processes (and dozens of individual processes), covering cost, FTE requirements, cycle times and error rates. These move the AI discussion beyond experimentation toward ROI‑led, process‑level transformation, helping leaders prioritize where AI can deliver material business value and redesign workflows for a truly agentic operating model. https://lnkd.in/eZ7ZX7Qr
Hackett Group Launches AI Benchmarks for Enterprise Performance
More Relevant Posts
-
Great to see this. Let's move the AI discussion beyond experimentation toward ROI‑led, process‑level transformation for a truly agentic operating model.
This is one of the most consequential pieces of IP development we've done...excited that The Hackett Group has launched AI World Class Benchmarks for the Agentic Enterprise - a new standard for measuring how AI and agentic workflows can fundamentally reshape enterprise performance, and a way for clients to 'future-proof' their service delivery model and ambition levels. The benchmarks extend Hackett’s Digital World Class framework to quantify the impact of GenAI and agentic workflows across 16 end‑to‑end processes (and dozens of individual processes), covering cost, FTE requirements, cycle times and error rates. These move the AI discussion beyond experimentation toward ROI‑led, process‑level transformation, helping leaders prioritize where AI can deliver material business value and redesign workflows for a truly agentic operating model. https://lnkd.in/eZ7ZX7Qr
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Hackett Group Inc. establishes AI World Class benchmarks quantifying 75% additional performance gains across 16 critical end-to-end processes for the agentic enterprise - https://lnkd.in/egb6Y2SF “Organizations must refocus their investment on critical processes that create strategic competitive advantage and measurable business value. AI World Class benchmarks provide the framework to accurately assess specific workflows, prioritize high-value opportunities, reduce execution risk and accelerate ROI-led transformation,” said Ted A. Fernandez, Chairman and CEO of The Hackett Group. #AITransformation #EnterpriseBenchmarks #AgenticAI #TechIntelPro
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Multi-Agent Systems: Why the Future of AI Is Teams, Not Tools The single AI agent model is already becoming obsolete. Not because individual agents are failing. But because the problems organizations need AI to solve are too complex for any single agent to handle alone. The future of enterprise AI is not a smarter single agent. It is a coordinated team of specialized agents — each bringing a specific capability to a shared goal — working together at a speed and scale that no human team and no single AI system can match. This is the multi-agent revolution. And it is already underway. A multi-agent system is an architecture where multiple specialized AI agents work together under a shared orchestration layer to accomplish complex, multi-step goals. Why multi-agent systems outperform single agents on complex tasks: Specialization — each agent is optimized for its specific function. A research agent is better at research than a generalist. A compliance agent is better at compliance than a generalist. Specialization compounds performance. Parallelization — multiple agents can work simultaneously rather than sequentially. A workflow that would take a single agent hours running through steps in sequence takes minutes when specialized agents work in parallel on different components simultaneously. Error containment — when one agent produces a wrong output, other agents in the system can catch it before it propagates — building in the verification and cross-checking that makes agentic systems more reliable at scale. Scalability without proportionate headcount — as the volume of work increases, the system scales by adding agents — not by adding humans. What multi-agent systems require that single agents do not: Shared context architecture — agents must be able to share information, pass outputs, and maintain consistent understanding of the overall goal across the entire workflow. Orchestration governance — a central layer that defines how agents communicate, how conflicts are resolved, and how the system escalates when human judgment is required. End-to-end observability — the ability to trace every step across every agent — not just the final output — so failures can be diagnosed and corrected at the agent level rather than the system level. The organizations building multi-agent systems now are not doing it for novelty. They are doing it because the operational problems they need to solve — cross-functional workflows spanning multiple systems, real-time decision-making at scale, processes that previously required dozens of human handoffs — genuinely require the coordinated intelligence that only a team of specialized agents can deliver. The question is not whether your organization needs multi-agent AI. It is whether you are building the architecture to support it — or whether you are deploying individual agents and calling it a strategy.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝗦𝗼𝗹𝗼 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗠𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶-𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗲. For the past year, everyone was racing to build their first AI agent. One agent. One task. One workflow. That was the starting line. Not the finish line. In 2026, the real shift is happening: from single agents to coordinated multi-agent systems where multiple AI agents plan, collaborate, delegate, and execute entire workflows autonomously, without waiting for a human to press a button. Here's what that actually looks like in practice: → Agent 1 monitors your data pipeline and detects an anomaly → Agent 2 pulls context, runs diagnostics, and drafts a root cause analysis → Agent 3 routes the findings to the right stakeholder via Slack or email → Agent 4 logs the incident, updates the dashboard, and triggers a fix Zero human input. End-to-end. This isn't science fiction. Agentic AI has moved from "emerging" to "mainstream adoption" according to Gartner and teams without dedicated ML engineers are already deploying these systems today. The numbers back it up too. The market for Agentic AI platforms stood at roughly $12–15B in 2025 and is projected to reach $80–100B by 2030 growing at a CAGR of 40–50%. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄: ✅ Frameworks like CrewAI, AutoGen, and LangGraph for orchestrating agent networks ✅ MCP (Model Context Protocol) giving agents secure, structured access to tools ✅ LLMs that can now reason, plan, and self-correct mid-execution ✅ Cloud infrastructure that makes running parallel agents affordable at scale 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵: 78% of executives say they'll have to reinvent their operating models to capture agentic AI's full value. (UiPath) That's not a tech problem. That's a strategy problem. Most companies are still automating isolated tasks. The ones winning right now are automating entire processes connecting data, decisions, systems, and people in one continuous intelligent workflow. This is exactly the kind of infrastructure I have building for clients. Not just "add AI here." But redesigning how work actually flows. The question for every business leader in 2026 isn't "𝘚𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘸𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘈𝘐 𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴?" It's "𝘞𝘩𝘰 𝘰𝘸𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘰 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵?" Because the teams that answer that question clearly will scale. Everyone else will be playing catch-up. What's your experience with multi-agent systems so far. #AgenticAI #MultiAgentSystems #AIAutomation #AIStrategy #GennovaSolutions #AIFromPakistan #FutureOfWork #DataScience #LLM #EnterpriseAI
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Agentic AI ROI will not be won in the demo. It will be won in enterprise execution. CORAS.ai President and CTO Dan Naselius explains why many AI deployments are not enterprise-ready. The real challenge is not model intelligence but repeatability, governance, workflow integration, auditability, and the production of trusted outcomes at scale. That is where CORAS.ai is different. Built for enterprise operations in the most secure environments, CORAS.ai helps organizations move beyond custom AI implementation models toward governed, repeatable agentic AI that reduces complexity, accelerates adoption, and delivers measurable ROI. Read why the future of agentic AI depends on enterprise execution. https://lnkd.in/eSRiauDN #AgenticAI #EnterpriseAI #DecisionIntelligence #ArtificialIntelligence #AIROI #DigitalTransformation #GovTech #CORASAI #EnterpriseExecution #FrontierAI #ForwardDeployedEngineers
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Don't miss a chance to see what is being done today in Enterprise Agentic Execution and Governance. Hint: it isn't about making a crystal ball. It is about harness agentic and human systems by leveraging each system's relative strengths.
Agentic AI ROI will not be won in the demo. It will be won in enterprise execution. CORAS.ai President and CTO Dan Naselius explains why many AI deployments are not enterprise-ready. The real challenge is not model intelligence but repeatability, governance, workflow integration, auditability, and the production of trusted outcomes at scale. That is where CORAS.ai is different. Built for enterprise operations in the most secure environments, CORAS.ai helps organizations move beyond custom AI implementation models toward governed, repeatable agentic AI that reduces complexity, accelerates adoption, and delivers measurable ROI. Read why the future of agentic AI depends on enterprise execution. https://lnkd.in/eSRiauDN #AgenticAI #EnterpriseAI #DecisionIntelligence #ArtificialIntelligence #AIROI #DigitalTransformation #GovTech #CORASAI #EnterpriseExecution #FrontierAI #ForwardDeployedEngineers
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most enterprises aren’t struggling with AI because of the technology. They’re struggling because of structure. Having worked inside large-scale enterprise environments, I’ve seen the same pattern repeat itself. There’s no shortage of ambition. Every business unit has an AI initiative. Every leadership team is talking about transformation. And yet—progress stalls. Not because the models aren’t good enough. But because the enterprise isn’t set up to absorb them. Existing systems are deeply embedded, data is fragmented, and governance is unclear. And there’s no shared agreement on what “production-ready AI” means. So teams experiment. Pilots multiply—and organizations get stuck in what I’d call 𝗽𝗶𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆. The mistake I see most often is trying to introduce AI through a single vendor lens. But enterprises don’t operate that way. They have decades of investments across platforms, partners, and internal systems. AI has to work with that reality, not replace it overnight. That’s why I’ve found a 𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗿-𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵 to be far more effective. I 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗮�� 𝗔𝗜 𝗔𝗱𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 & 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲l, less about tools, more about how the organization works. A few principles that consistently matter: • 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 AI only scales when priorities are clear across business, IT, finance, and risk. • 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 The goal isn’t to rip and replace—it’s to orchestrate across clouds, platforms, and partners. • 𝗙𝗶𝘅 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 Most AI friction isn’t model-related—it’s access, quality, and governance of data. • 𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 Adoption happens when teams understand how AI fits into their workflows. • 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳-𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲, 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗹𝘆 Give employees safe, governed ways to use AI without risking IP or compliance exposure. • 𝗠𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 The real value isn’t in isolated copilots—it’s in systems that act across workflows in customer experience, supply chain, and core operations. • 𝗘𝘅𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆, 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 The winners won’t be those who spend the most—but those who design intelligently across models, use cases, and architecture. The shift ahead isn’t about choosing the “right” AI vendor. It’s about building an enterprise where AI can actually function—across systems, teams, and decisions. That’s what separates experimentation from transformation. Most organizations I speak with aren’t blocked by AI capability. They’re blocked by how everything around it is structured. Curious where that friction is showing up in your world?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The biggest lie in enterprise AI right now is that the hard part is choosing the right model. It isn’t. The hard part is getting AI to operate where the data already lives. This week, CIO.com reported that nearly every enterprise is investing in AI, but only 5% say their data is ready. NTT DATA is warning that privacy and sovereignty barriers are slowing rollouts. Gartner says bad semantics are already driving inaccurate agents and wasted spend. That is why I think “AI on top of legacy software” is a dead-end architecture. You get another copilot. Another sidebar. Another dashboard. Very little closed-loop execution. What enterprises actually need is software that can do the work: read the document, classify it, route it, trigger the approval, update the system, and leave an audit trail. That is the difference between AI theater and an AI-native enterprise. The winning vendors in this cycle will not be the ones with the flashiest demo. They will be the ones that can run AI inside the customer’s environment, with governance, permissions, and system write-backs built in from day one. That is how month-end close goes from 12 days to 2. That is how Tier-1 resolution drops under 90 seconds. Not because the model got smarter. Because the workflow finally became executable. Building this architecture at InfraHive.ai. If you’re deciding whether to bolt AI onto legacy software or replace the workflow properly, book a call: https://infrahive.ai/book
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Artificial intelligence is steadily moving beyond surface-level interactions into deeply integrated enterprise capabilities. The shift from isolated tools to cohesive platforms is redefining how systems operate, scale, and deliver value across complex environments. This post introduces how enterprise AI platforms extend beyond user interfaces to enable operational intelligence at scale, forming the foundation for consistent, governed, and adaptive systems. #EnterpriseAI #DigitalTransformation #RealConnections
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Artificial intelligence is steadily moving beyond surface-level interactions into deeply integrated enterprise capabilities. The shift from isolated tools to cohesive platforms is redefining how systems operate, scale, and deliver value across complex environments. This post introduces how enterprise AI platforms extend beyond user interfaces to enable operational intelligence at scale, forming the foundation for consistent, governed, and adaptive systems. #EnterpriseAI #DigitalTransformation #RealConnections
To view or add a comment, sign in
More from this author
Explore related topics
- How to Use Agentic AI in Business Workflows
- How Agentic AI Drives Business Profitability
- Importance of Benchmarks for AI Models
- GenAI Business Models for Enterprise Adoption
- How to Assess AI Agents Using Practical Benchmarks
- How Genai Will Transform Work Environments
- How Genai is Reshaping Industry Standards
- AI Language Model Benchmarks
- How to Evaluate Agentic AI Performance
- The Impact of AI on Workplace Performance Metrics