Sometimes writers think working with subject matter experts is all about asking questions and taking notes. But the fundamental shift happens when you start treating those conversations like a product discovery session. In this video, I break down how a writer can gather requirements the way a product manager does. It covers how to map problem statements, validate assumptions, and shape documentation decisions using the same mindset teams use when building features. If you’re trying to level up your collaboration with experts, this might offer a new angle to work from.
More Relevant Posts
-
The Project Manager's Dream Toolkit for Writers: Asengana vs. The RestIf you’re a writer who’s ever dreamt of blending narrative magic with the precision of a Gantt chart, there’s a platform designed with your brain in mind. Asengana isn’t just a writing app. It’s a writing ecosystem built for those who see a story as both art and architecture. But how does it stack up against popular tools like Scrivener, Atticus, and Dabble? Let’s break it down. What Makes Asengana Different At its core, Asengana is a digital habitat for novelists who crave structure. It treats a writing project like a real project—with planning, task management, analytics, and milestones. But […]
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Good product documentation doesn’t start with writing. It starts with thinking like a user. As technical writers, we don’t just explain features. We translate product intent into user confidence. Product documentation sits at the intersection of product, engineering, design, support, and users. That’s what makes it powerful and hard to do well. From a tech writer’s perspective, solid product documentation is about: 🔹 Understanding the product before documenting it 🔹 Asking “why” before explaining “how” 🔹 Writing for real workflows, not ideal scenarios 🔹 Reducing support tickets through clarity 🔹 Enabling adoption, not just compliance Great docs answer questions users haven’t learned to ask yet. They scale knowledge when teams can’t. They quietly shape the product experience. My usual documentation flow looks something like this: • Product discovery and stakeholder sync • Understanding user personas and use cases • Structuring information, not dumping it • Writing with consistency, reuse, and search in mind • Reviewing with engineers and product teams • Maintaining docs as the product evolves In a strong product-led company, documentation is not an afterthought. It’s part of the product. If you work in product documentation, technical writing, UX writing, or knowledge management, you already know this. If you don’t, your users feel it. #ProductDocumentation #TechnicalWriting #TechWriter #UXWriting #DocsAsCode #KnowledgeManagement #SaaSDocumentation #UserExperience #ProductTeams
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Want to think like a Product Manager? Let’s put theory into action. This carousel isn’t just content—it’s a workbook. One that pushes you to pause, think, and practice key PM skills. 📌 What’s inside: Real prioritization logic Product communication vocabulary Strategy-vs-design trade-offs A moment to analyze real-world decisions Swipe through. Reflect. And tag a PM-in-the-making. #ProductManagement #ThinkLikeaPM #CILAcademy #ProductStrategy #TechCareers
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
What are best practices for writing user stories? User story 📖 best practices 😊: - Keep 📖 short 📄: 1-2 sentences 📝. - Focus 🎯 on user 👥: Write 📝 from user 👥 POV 👀. - Clear 🤔 language 🗣️: No jargon 🤐. - Define 📦 'done' ✅: Acceptance 📝 criteria 📊. - Independent 🧘♀️: Stories 📖 shouldn't 🛑 depend 📈 on others 📖. #Agile #UserStory
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most books don't fail because of bad ideas. They fail because of bad systems. After helping multiple thought leaders finish their books, I learned this the hard way. The difference between a finished manuscript and an abandoned Google Doc isn't talent or time. It's structure. Here's the 6-month system that gets books across the finish line: Month 1: Lock in your core message and reader transformation. Month 2: Build your chapter architecture and content map. Month 3-4: Write in focused sprints with weekly accountability. Month 5: Edit for clarity, flow, and impact. Month 6: Final review and publication prep. Why this works: Clear checkpoints every 2 weeks keep momentum alive. Weekly check-ins prevent the "I'll do it next week" trap. 1,000 words per week becomes 24,000 words in 6 months. You become "someone writing a book" by week 3. The system removes decisions. No more "what should I write today?" paralysis. Five traps that kill book projects: Writing without structure. Map all chapters before writing word one. Waiting for perfect conditions. Start messy, refine later. Working in isolation. Weekly accountability keeps you honest. Editing while creating. Separate creation from refinement completely. Treating it like a side project. Schedule it like a client meeting. Our completion rate? 87%. Industry average? Less than 30%. The difference isn't the writers. It's the system.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
✨ One thing I’m leaving behind in 2025 is the obsession with perfection. From a technical writer’s desk, perfection looks deceptively reasonable. One more rephrase, one more synonym, one more review to make the sentence sound just a little bit cleaner. The text feels endlessly adjustable because you can always rephrase it differently and refine it further. And yes, another writer might rewrite the same paragraph in their own words tomorrow anyway.🤷♀️ 💡 Here is the uncomfortable truth I’m taking with me into 2026. Documentation is not a monument. It’s a living system. While a page is being polished into theoretical perfection, users are waiting for answers and teams are working with outdated guidance. ✅ Good documentation is clear, accurate, and usable at the moment it’s needed. Perfect documentation is usually unfinished or late. The moment documentation becomes good enough to help, it already fulfills its purpose. 🚀 In 2026, I choose progress over polishing, clarity over elegance, and iteration over endless refinement. Documentation grows through feedback, usage, and real interaction. Leaving perfectionism behind doesn’t mean lowering standards. It means respecting time, teams, and users more than our inner critic. And that feels like a much more professional habit to carry forward. 😌 #TechnicalWriting #IntelliVoice #DocumentationManagement #TechComm #ITDocumentation #Confluence
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
For years, I told myself I wasn’t built for writing sprints. I wrote in bursts. When the mood showed up, I worked. When it didn’t, I waited. That approach felt creative. It also stalled books. Everything changed after a single day of structured writing sprints at an Indie Capstone event. Four short sessions. Ten to fifteen minutes each. No pressure to be brilliant—just a commitment to show up and write new words. I wrote 1,500 words that day. Words I could actually use. Words that unlocked momentum I hadn’t felt in months. What surprised me wasn’t the output. It was the shift in mindset. Sprinting isn’t about speed. It’s about commitment. A promise to yourself—or to others—that you’ll write, even when you don’t feel like it. Now I sprint daily. Two short sessions before anything else competes for my attention. Often, once I start, I keep going. The habit creates space for creativity instead of waiting for it to arrive, often resulting in three to four hours progressing my WIP. I’ve also moved from solo sprinting to group sprinting, and the accountability has sharpened everything. Stronger discipline. Better focus. Less drama. If you’re an author who feels stuck, inconsistent, or overwhelmed, this might be worth trying. Start small. Set a timer. Write new words. Edit later. It worked for me—and it’s the reason the next Blake Willis novel is nearly here. https://lnkd.in/gxaNpAHP
To view or add a comment, sign in
-