My Pre-Writing Process for Effective Content Creation

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.

My exact pre-writing process that clients pay me for ,before I’ve written a single word: 1. I stalk your audience (legally) I go where your ideal clients complain. Reddit threads, quora questions, competitor comment sections. I’m not looking for what they want. I’m looking for what’s keeping them up at 3am. That’s the post. That’s always the post. 2. I break up with your brand voice Then get back together with it. I read your old content and I ask: “Who is this person when they’re not trying to sound professional?” THAT version of you? That’s who people actually buy from. 3. I build your “enemy” Every great piece of content has a villain. A wrong belief, a bad habit or an industry lie. I find yours. Cuz people don’t share content that agrees with them, they share content that finally says what they were thinking. 4. I run the “So what?” test I take every point and ask it out loud. Most content dies here. “Here are 5 tips for productivity.” —>So what? “Here’s why your productivity system is making you lazier.” —> NOW we’re talking. 5. I find the one person Not your “target audience.” One specific human. What do they do Sunday night? What do they dread Monday morning? What would make them screenshot this post and text it to someone? Write for that person. The algorithm rewards you with everyone else. Most people think they’re paying me to write but they’re actually paying me to think. The writing takes 2 hours, this process takes days and it’s why the content actually works :) #ScribbledByS LinkedIn And if you want this process working for your brand ,my DMs are open.

  • No alternative text description for this image

📌 A layer I sometimes see missing in most content strategies is aftermath thinking. What happens after someone agrees with your post? Do they know what to do next, what to change, or what to question? Content that guides the “next step” quietly builds authority faster than content that just gets nods.

📌 One thing I’ve noticed that amplifies this process even more is timing. The same insight can flop or fly depending on when it’s shared. When your audience is already feeling the problem (end of quarter stress, monday anxiety, industry shifts), your content doesn’t just resonate,it feels urgent. That’s when people act, not just engage!!

📌 Also, the “one person” idea gets even sharper when you give that person stakes. What do they lose if they ignore this post? Time, money, confidence, opportunities? When the cost of inaction is clear, your content stops being interesting and becomes necessary.

Step 1 is genuinely underrated. 🎯 "What's keeping them up at 3am" is the exact question most businesses skip — especially trade business owners. A plumber's ideal customer isn't thinking "I need SEO." They're thinking "I can't get enough steady jobs" or "I'm losing calls to the guy down the road who shows up first on Google." Speak to THAT fear — and suddenly the content actually converts. The "So what?" test alone would clean up 90% of generic business content. 🔥

Like
Reply

By reading your process, what stood out is how much focus is on people, not just content Bbecause if you get the person right, the writing almost solves itself

📌📌My Key Takeaway 🕵️♂️ Finding what keeps the audience up at 3am really flips the script on generic content. 🎭 The “break up and get back together” with brand voice feels like reclaiming authenticity, not rehearsed polish. 🎯 Writing for one person, not a crowd, makes all the difference in connection and reach. PS: If stalking your audience is wrong, I don’t want to be right.

Sanvi Khandelwal point 3 is the one most content creators skip entirely and it's the difference between content that gets nodded at and content that gets shared. People don't share things that confirm what they already believe. They share things that finally articulate what they've been feeling but couldn't say. Finding the enemy isn't about being controversial but it's about having a clear enough point of view to take a side. And the "So what?" test should honestly be a standard filter before anything gets published. How often do you find clients resist the enemy-building step and what's usually the reason?

Some scribbles don’t ask for attention… they quietly hold a truth people feel the moment they read it. That’s why simple words often stay the longest.

Charging for the thinking is the hardest sell, writing just looks like the work

Sanvi Khandelwal This is what separates writers from strategists, the thinking before writing is where impact is built.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories