Most instructional design portfolios fail before hiring managers even open them. Not because of the projects. Because of the website. Your portfolio isn’t just a container for projects. It’s a design artifact. And instructional designers forget something important: eLearning is basically a miniature website. If your portfolio site is: • cluttered • hard to navigate • visually inconsistent • slow or confusing Hiring managers immediately see a problem. Because they assume: “If the portfolio website is poorly designed, the learning experiences probably are too.” A strong portfolio website should show: • clear navigation • thoughtful structure • clean visual hierarchy • simple user experience In other words, it should demonstrate good learning design. Before anyone opens your projects, they’re already evaluating how you design experiences. Your website is the first learning experience they see. Curious: What’s the biggest mistake you see in instructional design portfolios?
Thank you!
One thing I see often (in addition to what you mentioned) is portfolios that rely heavily on screenshots of learning artifacts, but don’t give viewers anything to actually engage with. Screenshots make it harder to understand how the learning experience works. They force people to make assumptions about your work, which weakens your POV, and creates friction; that’s where you lose viewer interest.
Thank you for this insight. Is it possible that you could share a sample of what an ideal portfolio should look like?