Running a network means I (Dr Kat Carruthers ) hear a lot of opinions, particularly from business owners (mostly micro - SME). The most divisive standoff at the moment is pro-ai and against-ai. Some people are experiencing existential dread and others are folding in their business before anything has “gone wrong” because of their fear of being replaced by AI. The mental health impact on this generation is phenomenal so I want to shine a light on how we can perhaps move into this new era of technology (like when we got the internet) without scaremongering and ‘othering’. Some things I’ve seen recently: - sweeping statements (from AI businesses) rendering other businesses obsolete, whether it’s universities, content creators, or marketers. You may believe in what you’re saying and it certainly makes for strong marketing but let’s think about those people in the jobs that you’re saying will be redundant. Let’s be ethical. Marketing on fear is a big personal no no. What may seem like humour for many is the reason my inbox is pinging with business owners experiencing anxiety, depression, and worse. - positioning it as an either or. It’s not AI OR humans it’s about how we can support all people and businesses to embrace AI and evolve their businesses and working roles. How can it be leveraged to support opportunities without loss of opportunity? Periods of rapid change in society are HARD, and even harder for those with additional barriers such as poor digital literacy, access to technology, or who are living in poverty. The gap will widen if we don’t collectively and responsibly tackle it. Let’s promote how AI can support everyone to thrive and recognise that there is room for EVERYONE. We are on the precipice of a big moment of occupational injustice where people begin to feel alienated from their work, displacement of roles, and that work has lost meaning. I am creating an #occupationalinjustice research action group to tackle some of the rising injustices for children, families and the workforce. AI is one of them. Watch this space. Curious to know what my fellow OTs think! Royal College of Occupational Therapists Dr Claire Hart Alice Gair Andy Graham #networknotwork #debate #ai #occupationaltherapy #occupationaltherapists
I do not believe using AI at the moment, is an either/or when it comes to hiring a person/ buying an ai model. Artificial Intelligence models were written and coded by highly skilled developers, who can dictate how they want the model to interact with certain data; numbers, text etc. . Even as a tool for research, the model will be engineered to use search engines to find information quickly. AI is good for research, and solving basic queries; but I believe at the minute, AI is not yet at the point that it can consistently outperform a human being. I also do not believe that humans will ever create an AI model that could have the potential to be able to create subsequent AI models, as this has potential for yet-unseen ethical and technological complications. This has been a trope in science fiction in popular media circa. Terminator. I believe there is a very human fear about the potential for Artificial Intelligence, but we have to remember that we are the masters of this, as we have the power to code/ program these pieces of software, giving us total control of how they operate.
If AI is used to accelerate the present economic model we all in trouble if it's used to bring in RBE,CE or DE then it will be useful but my faith in humanity is dwindling and I think we in trouble.
I find the movement to towards AI exciting, yet some examples coming through are showing some incredibly disablist and discriminatory trends. For example, A.I. when used in recruitment had been shown to 'filter out' disabled candidates or mark their CVs as lower. It some cases AI is learning from the data and the world around us.... but the data and the world around us continues to discriminate. I'm worried that we are just building systems for the 'majority'. We must audit AI systems for bias, and this work must be done by those who are impacted - because we know exactly what to look for.