5 Reasons PACs Boost Trust in AI Systems

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.

Excited to share a piece I recently wrote for Nava on something I’ve seen make a real difference when testing AI-powered tools: working with participant advisory councils (PACs). While AI systems are often judged by metrics like accuracy and speed, what ultimately determines success is whether people trust them, understand them, and can use them in their day-to-day work. That’s where PACs come in. In this article, I break down 5 reasons why PACs are so valuable—from uncovering workflow friction to surfacing risks that traditional testing can miss. Grateful to our Comms team for sharing this, and to everyone who’s contributed their time and insights to this work. Would love to hear how others are thinking about testing and trust when it comes to AI 👇 https://lnkd.in/gZnEvTcU

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories