AI Execution Stack: JAX vs PyTorch 2.x

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.

🎯 AI Execution Stack (JAX vs PyTorch 2.x): From Model to Machine Code Earlier this week, I attended the 2025 JAX & OpenXLA DevLabs — and it was incredibly insightful. The deep dives into JAX’s lowering pipeline, StableHLO, and the broader OpenXLA ecosystem inspired me to visualize the full AI execution stack. Comparing JAX/XLA with the PyTorch ecosystem helped me better understand the low-level architecture of ML systems, including core concepts like IR (Intermediate Representation), ML Compiler, and Runtime Execution. 🔍 This visualization covers: 🔹 JAX → JAXPR → XLA → HLO → TPU/GPU/CPU 🔹 PyTorch 2.x → FX → Inductor → Triton/NvFuser/C++ → GPU/CPU 🔹 PyTorch → ONNX → TensorRT / ONNX Runtime → GPU It’s fascinating to see how ML compilation is evolving toward modular, backend-agnostic design, enabling portable and efficient execution across diverse hardware. 🙏 Special thanks to Han Qi (PyTorch/XLA expert) for generously sharing insights and helping clarify the internals of the stack. Also grateful to my teammates for the ongoing technical discussions and encouragement. 💬 Feel free to share feedback or correct anything in the diagram — I’m still learning too! #JAX #XLA #StableHLO #HLO #PyTorch #TorchInductor #ONNX #TensorRT #AIInfrastructure #MachineLearning #DeepLearning

  • diagram

Great post! Can relate to a quantization task worked recently.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories