The Problem with Ghostwriting on LinkedIn

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.

For a long time, I thought good structure was enough. Clean hook. Tight body. Clear CTA. Then I started reading my clients' posts back to them out loud. They'd go quiet. Not because it was bad. Because it didn't sound like them. It sounded like LinkedIn. Polished hooks. Decent engagement. Zero trace of an actual person behind it. That's the problem with most ghostwriting. It optimizes for the feed, not the founder. And your audience notices. Not dramatically. Quietly. They stop clicking. Stop commenting. Stop thinking of you as someone worth following. "Good enough" content doesn't just underperform. It actively erodes trust. When your writing and your voice don't match, people feel the gap. They just can't name it. Real ghostwriting doesn't sound like writing. It sounds like you on your best day. Your rhythm. Your opinions. Your specific way of saying things. Not sanitized. Not wrapped in a framework. The reader should never wonder who wrote it. Because it sounds exactly like the person it's supposed to. That's the standard. Most ghostwriters never hit it. If you read this and thought "that's my content" — let's talk.

  • text

People tend to feel when something is technically right but missing something real underneath. Kris J. Curran

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories