Can Your AI Vendor Enforce Ethics in Their System

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.

Dennis asked the question every AI buyer should be asking: can your vendor actually prove their system follows the ethical standards they claim? Love that he turned it into something anyone can take in three minutes. As Notovision's Chief Architect, these commandments hit close to home — they're the requirements spec behind every agent we ship. Not principles on a wall. Enforced in the architecture, auditable in the graph, and deletable on demand when a user exercises their right to be forgotten. Take Dennis's three-minute assessment. Drop your score in the comments — green or red, I want to see where the industry stands. 👉 Take the AI Code of Ethics Self-Assessment: https://lnkd.in/gYmYBuvk 📜 Read the Ten Commandments: https://lnkd.in/gD2q3muq

View profile for Dennis Noto

🚨 RED ALERT to every executive, builder, and AI vendor reading this: Remember the movie - Jurassic Park? Dr. Ian Malcolm in the lunch scene: "I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here: it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step… You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could, and before you even knew what you had, you patented it, and packaged it, and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now you're selling it." "You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it." Now look at what's happening with agentic AI in 2026. Companies are wiring autonomous agents into production, agents that book travel, move money, write code, send email on your behalf, and call other agents. Nobody is asking the hard question: What ethics did this thing learn, and from whom? Most "alignment" today comes down to a training step where humans rank AI answers from best to worst, and the model learns to imitate whatever those humans rewarded. That's where the moral compass — or the lack of one gets baked in. If your vendor can't tell you who did that ranking, what guidelines they followed, and what behaviors got rewarded vs. punished. you don't have a product. 🦖𝗜𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗗𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗘𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗖𝗦 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗜𝗡 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗘𝗟'𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗫𝗧, 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗔 𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗔𝗡 𝗔𝗣𝗜 𝗞𝗘𝗬🦖 Should we wait for Congress to fix this? Be serious. They can't agree on social media. They are not coming to save us. That leaves us — the builders, the executives, the vendors. The people who stood on the shoulders of giants and shipped this stuff. The responsibility is ours. At Notovision, we didn't wait. We wrote our own line in the sand: the Notovision AI Code of Ethics — Ten Commandments that govern every agent, every workflow, every recommendation we put in front of a customer. It's the same standard I hold myself to and the same standard my partners Linda Wittich and Jim Barnebee build to, every single day. A few of the commandments we live by: ✅ Cite your sources and explain your methods. ✅ Communicate the plan, then keep users informed at every step. ✅ Acknowledge limits plainly when certainty isn't possible. ✅ Be transparent at all times that you are an AI, not a human. And here's the part that should matter to every executive buying AI right now:  If you're a company licensing AI from a vendor — demand their Code of Ethics. In writing. Before you sign. Before you deploy it on your customers, your employees, or your data. Ask for the evidence, audit logs, the proof that a Code of Ai Ethics is in place! 👉 Read the Ten Commandments here: https://lnkd.in/gD2q3muq #AgenticAI #AIEthics #ResponsibleAI #AIGovernance #GenerativeAI #AIStrategy #EnterpriseAI #AILeadership #TechEthics #AIAlignment #CIO #CTO #DigitalTransformation #Notovision #JurassicPark

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories