Jeremy Theocharis’ Post

“But what about NATS?” - I hear this all the time—especially after my recent posts on MQTT. 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭: No single message broker or protocol is a silver bullet. Neither MQTT nor Kafka nor AMQP nor NATS. Never! 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝—𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐈’𝐦 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: Synadia, the original donor of NATS, has told the CNCF it plans to withdraw the project, re-license it under the Business Source License (BUSL), and reclaim community assets such as nats.io and the GitHub organization. Industry experts (e.g., Alex Kritikos) have warned me for years that NATS wasn’t truly open source / had open standards. Now I see their point. 🔗 Full CNCF statement: https://lnkd.in/eAwxEdBe

Indeed.. And the problem now is that all these frustrated #NATS users are locked into something they thought was an open ecosystem but is turning proprietary overnight. Perhaps we should implement the #NATS protocol in MAPS Messaging BV to give them a way out...

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories