🔒 Privacy is not optional in Web3 👉 Blockchains are transparent by design. That’s great for accountability — but it also means sensitive financial, corporate, or government transactions are exposed by default. Without strong privacy, adoption will always be limited. 💡 This is where cryptography steps in. Tools like: ☑️ zk-SNARKs, ☑️ STARKs, ☑️ Bulletproofs, ☑️ ring signatures, and ☑️ TEEs allow us to prove correctness without exposing private data. Or as I like to say: the proof is in the pudding. ✍ I wrote an article breaking down these technologies in clear, non-technical language — and exploring how protocols like Zcash, Monero, StarkNet, Oasis, Mina, and Cardano Midnight are experimenting with privacy today. Read more in my new article 👇 Would love to hear your thoughts: how important is privacy for the next wave of Web3 adoption? #Web3 #Privacy #Blockchain #Cryptography #ZeroKnowledge
Without privacy, Web3 remains a public experiment rather than a practical financial layer.
David Dobrovitsky thats why ZK is gonna change the game big time
Monero is the OG here.
Thanks for sharing.
It’s absolutely essential without true privacy, Web3 will never reach mainstream adoption
How far do you think privacy can scale without hurting performance?
Privacy is the foundation of Web3 adoption. Transparency alone isn’t enough.
In a trustless industry as Web3 we can't downplay the importance of security- I don't the issue of security should be an after thought.
Currently in my first proper build and this is spot on. Blockchains greatest strength of transparency is also ironically its greatest weakness in certain contexts. I’ve had to contemplate various workarounds for token gating solutions for my build and agree on what you’ve identified! Thanks for sharing
CEO & CMO | Web3 & AI Growth Strategist | Bridging Finance, Blockchain & Brand Trust | Advisor & Writer on the Future of Money & Innovation
4whttps://davidobrovitsky.substack.com/p/proofs-of-privacy-how-cryptography