Stanford & SambaNova research challenges "brevity bias" in LLMs, proposes ACE for dynamic prompts.

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.

What if LLMs actually get smarter with longer, more detailed instructions? New research from Stanford University & SambaNova suggests our "brevity bias" is a critical flaw in building self-improving AI. A new paper, "𝐀𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 (𝐀𝐂𝐄)," directly confronts two major issues: - Brevity Bias: Prompt optimizers often create short, generic instructions, losing vital domain-specific details. - Context Collapse: Iteratively rewriting prompts causes them to degrade over time, erasing accumulated knowledge. Instead of creating a concise summary, ACE treats context as an evolving playbook. It uses a modular workflow (Generator, Reflector, Curator) to make small, incremental "delta updates." This allows the context to grow and refine itself over time, preserving crucial details. The results: - ACE boosted performance by +10.6% on agent tasks (AppWorld) and +8.6% on complex financial analysis. - Crucially, a smaller open-source model using ACE matched the top-ranked GPT-4.1-based agent on the AppWorld leaderboard, proving the power of a superior context strategy. The implications are profound. Instead of treating prompts as static instructions, we should see them as dynamic, living knowledge bases. This paves the way for more resilient, continuously learning AI systems that adapt on the fly with incredible efficiency. #AI #MachineLearning #LLM #AIAgents #PromptEngineering

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories