Trust is not lost because of where the money comes from. It is lost because nobody explained it. The Trust in Civil Society Report (July 2025) makes this painfully clear. When people discover a nonprofit receives significant federal funding, trust drops from 57% to 38%. Not because they oppose it. Because they found out on their own. That distinction matters more than most leaders realize. Government funding is legitimate. It is common. It keeps programs running and communities served. But when it surfaces without context — in a news story, a public filing, a casual conversation — it reads as something concealed. Even when it was not. The same report shows the flip side. When organizations proactively explain their funding mix, trust goes up. People reward openness. They do not need a perfect funding story. They need an honest one. This is not a communications problem. It is a leadership one. If your board cannot clearly articulate where your funding comes from and why, your community is filling that gap with assumptions. And assumptions, left unchecked, become suspicion. Own the story before someone else tells it. What does your organization's funding narrative sound like right now? #NonprofitLeadership #Trust #Transparency #Governance #NonprofitStrategy #SectorHealth #ClickVirtualSupport
Nonprofit Trust Lost Due to Lack of Funding Transparency
More Relevant Posts
-
Private inurement is one of the most serious, and often misunderstood, risks facing nonprofit organizations. Unlike many compliance issues, a finding of inurement can result in the permanent loss of tax-exempt status, with little opportunity to correct the mistake after the fact. The IRS’s most recent guidance reinforces just how strictly this rule is applied, particularly when it comes to compensation, insider transactions, and governance practices. Here is a breakdown of what nonprofit leaders should be paying attention to.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The best policy research often lives in nonprofit databases, not think tank reports. New post on how organizations can bring their data to the table where decisions are made. Read more → https://lnkd.in/eVUsjpjq More at https://lnkd.in/eHw68uX3 #NonprofitData #PolicyDecisions #PublicPolicy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The best policy research often lives in nonprofit databases, not think tank reports. New post on how organizations can bring their data to the table where decisions are made. Read more → https://lnkd.in/eVUsjpjq More at https://lnkd.in/eHw68uX3 #NonprofitData #PolicyDecisions #PublicPolicy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The best policy research often lives in nonprofit databases, not think tank reports. New post on how organizations can bring their data to the table where decisions are made. Read more → https://lnkd.in/eVUsjpjq More at https://lnkd.in/eHw68uX3 #NonprofitData #PolicyDecisions #PublicPolicy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Restricted funds tracked in three different places. Program staff asking for numbers you don't have yet. Too many spreadsheets. After working with hundreds of nonprofits to redesign their finance system, we’ve found a clear path that helps nonprofits choose the right fit. Our latest post with insights from Lisa Toback, CPA, PMP and Kate Koraia, MBA breaks down what nonprofit leaders should think through at every stage of the decision. #nonprofitfinance #nonprofitleadership 🔗 https://lnkd.in/eXeiH2SA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most nonprofit boards can tell you their total revenue. But ask them about funding resilience—their ability to continue operating when funding timing, availability, or structure changes—and the conversation gets much harder. Over the next few weeks, we’re sharing 5 questions nonprofit leaders should be asking about funding resilience. These aren't questions about "do we have enough funding?" They're questions about "is our funding built to withstand disruption?" Because the greatest financial risk for many nonprofits isn't losing a grant. It's being built in a way that requires everything to go right, all the time. Question #1 drops tomorrow. Curious about how a Funding Resilience Review can help your organization? Learn more at the link in the comments below. Daniel Sefick, CPA, CGFM
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Funding resilience is an important conversation for nonprofit leaders and boards. It’s easy to focus on total revenue, but the real question is whether an organization’s funding structure can withstand disruptions when timing, availability, or funding sources change. Looking forward to this series of questions on strengthening nonprofits!
Most nonprofit boards can tell you their total revenue. But ask them about funding resilience—their ability to continue operating when funding timing, availability, or structure changes—and the conversation gets much harder. Over the next few weeks, we’re sharing 5 questions nonprofit leaders should be asking about funding resilience. These aren't questions about "do we have enough funding?" They're questions about "is our funding built to withstand disruption?" Because the greatest financial risk for many nonprofits isn't losing a grant. It's being built in a way that requires everything to go right, all the time. Question #1 drops tomorrow. Curious about how a Funding Resilience Review can help your organization? Learn more at the link in the comments below. Daniel Sefick, CPA, CGFM
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Many nonprofit boards carefully review budgets, audits, and financial reports. But one question often gets far less attention: Is our work actually achieving the mission we care about? Strong boards don’t just monitor finances. They evaluate impact. Regular impact evaluations help a board step back and ask the deeper questions: ✔️ Are our programs producing the outcomes we hoped for? ✔️ Which services are truly moving the needle? ✔️ Where might we need to adapt or refocus? This process also helps boards develop a clearer theory of change or a shared understanding of how specific services lead to meaningful outcomes. When boards understand that connection, they can: 👉 Align programs more closely with mission 👉 Prioritize the services that create the greatest impact 👉 Make more strategic funding and resource decisions 👉 Tell a clearer story to donors, partners, and the community Budgets tell you how money is spent but impact evaluation tells you whether the mission is actually being fulfilled. #nonprofitboards #boardimpactevaluation #boardofdirectors #theoryofchange #organizationdevelopmentconsulting #boardpartner
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Trust is often talked about as a value in nonprofit work. But what happens when we start treating it as infrastructure? In an article with The Nonprofit Hive, our CEO Jamie Williams reflects on the tension many nonprofit leaders feel between relationship-based work and the pressure to produce report-ready metrics. The work of building healthier communities doesn’t always fit neatly into tidy outputs. But trust, relationships, and long-term commitment are often the foundation that makes meaningful change possible. Take a moment to read Jamie’s thoughtful reflection below.
We say “people give to people” all the time in fundraising. But what if we took that idea seriously across our entire funding system? In her latest Hive article, Jamie Williams, MBA, CEO at Healthier Texas challenges something many nonprofit leaders feel but don’t always name: We are often asked to translate deeply human, slow, trust-based change into tidy, fundable outcomes. Metrics matter. Accountability matters. But when funding models force a choice between relationship-based work and report-ready outputs, something important gets lost. Jamie writes about what it looks like to treat trust not as a soft skill, not as an outcome to measure at the end — but as infrastructure. The foundation everything else stands on. After losing 80% of federal funding in 2025, she had to rethink sustainability in real time. Not just how to replace revenue. But how to design work around what actually produces lasting change. Her reflection is steady, not reactive. Honest, not dramatic. And it raises an important question for our sector: What would shift if trust-based nonprofit funding models became the norm instead of the exception? If you’ve ever felt the tension between what the grant allows and what your community actually needs, this one will resonate. Read the full article: https://lnkd.in/gyUmm6tW What’s one place in your work where trust is doing more heavy lifting than your metrics capture? #NonprofitLeadership #TrustBasedFunding #SocialImpact #NonprofitCommunity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Nonprofit organizations have no shortage of systems. ✔️ Donor relationships live in CRMs ✔️ Grants live in proposal platforms ✔️ Reporting lives in documents and spreadsheets Each system does its job. What the systems don’t hold is the thinking that connects the work. - Why a decision was made - How priorities shifted - What shaped the work over time That context doesn’t disappear. It just lives somewhere else. Usually, with the person holding it all together. And for a while, that works. Until it doesn’t. Then the question surfaces: Where does the reasoning live?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore related topics
- Significance of Funding for Nonprofits
- Building Trust With Donors Through Transparency
- Civil society organizations and local trust building
- The Importance Of Transparency In Nonprofit Change
- The Role of Transparency in Fundraising
- Building Trust Through Local Nonprofit Storytelling
- How to build trust without bureaucracy
- Tips for Building Trust in Philanthropy