A CMO is not the head of campaigns. That was marketing a decade ago. As growth became multi-channel, product-led, and brand-driven, the CMO role moved from execution → business design. Today, a true CMO owns: • Growth architecture • Category narrative • Go-to-market • Marketing org design • Leadership alignment Execution sits in teams. Direction sits with the CMO. Yet many companies still scope the role as channel leadership. Curious how others see this shift: 👉 In your organisation, is the CMO defining growth strategy or primarily managing execution or agencie?
CMO is not a magician either. Unless he/she gets the table in designing the fundamentals - products, processes, experiences, and culture - we won't see a true and lasting impact.
Scoped a CMO role wrong once. Cost us 18 months and a market window.
Most JDs still want CMOs acting as an in-house agency.
Strong point, Harliien. In many organisations, we still see the CMO being pulled back into campaigns and channel metrics/operational areas.. But in reality, growth today is shaped much earlier, in product thinking, positioning, pricing, partnerships and customer experience. The strongest CMOs I have seen act as a bridge between business, product and revenue teams, not just marketing. In our ecosystem, the real shift happens when leadership trusts marketing to influence business direction, not just communication. Curious to see how more organisations in India evolve on this.
Even about 28 years back, when I was a mere Asst. Manager Marketing & PR, but was leading Marketing as my Reporting Manager was a Korean and I was nowhere near being a CMO, it wasn't only about managing agencies & execution. CMO's managing Campaigns is the (mis)understanding of those who think Marketing=Advertising or Marcomm.
Completely agree. The same shift is happening with the COO role too. We see a lot of founders hire a CMO expecting growth, but without the operating model, data and commercial clarity in place, even the best strategy struggles to land. Direction without control just creates more complexity. The strongest businesses we work with have tight alignment between CMO and COO — growth architecture on one side, execution and scalability on the other. That’s usually where predictable, sustainable growth starts to show up.
I think all this was there earlier as well, the key changes according toe are as under: Two way information sync: ealeir communication was one way (TV, newpapers), now it's two way (online). Dynamism: The pace of change, needs to made pace with. Design are copied fast, campaigns go viral and bad publicity spreads much faster. Profit is not more an objective: Atleast there are many players who are just looking at scaling up. Customer wants to be listened: And see it. In all this, his role becomes central motar of the organization, what eys and ears (sales and service) bring in, the mortar processes and gives approitate reflex. It decides what needs to be processed at cognitive level (R&D, communication, PD). CMO role is becomes more demanding than ever....
Can’t help myself … to all the comments yes… but, Marketing has always been strategic in the most sophisticated companies like P&G, Honeywell, Apple, etc. what’s fun is seeing awareness of the Fortune 500 and even some Mid Mkt companies become engaged on the depth and breadth of Marketing! Thrilled to have the expanded advocacy … quite frankly it’s been the companies and marketers that never knew what success looked like that has held our “function” from being everything it can be! Let’s keep advocating for success!
Harliien Man . There's another layer now: the CMO as bridge to the CDO/CTO. Strategy lives or dies on backend integration not just buying tools. If the CMO doesn't understand how data flows between CRM, warehouse, and activation layers, they're building on quicksand. AI advantage comes from proprietary customer signals, which means marketing can't operate in a tech silo anymore.