For the next few days I want to share something I’ve been thinking about a lot. It’s about the tools I use to write, edit, and communicate better. Tools that have really helped me as an editor, proofreader, transcriber, and even as someone who writes long-form messages all the time. If you’re a first-time author, an author trying to write more consistently, or someone who wants to be more productive with writing, these tools can help you do more without taking over your thoughts. They don’t replace what you want to say, they support you and make your ideas shine the way you mean them to. I’ll be talking about tools like Grammarly, Google Suite, Notion, among others. These are some of the tools I’ve used myself and learned from over time, not just tools I’ve read about online. I’ll start with Grammarly and why it has been so personal to me. Tell me, which tool has been of great help to you? #grammarly #editor #proofreader #writer #author
Grammarly and other writing tools for improved productivity
More Relevant Posts
-
Good writing isn’t ruined by bad grammar. It’s ruined by unclear storytelling. As a beta reader, proofreader, and editor, this is something I see all the time. A story can have perfect grammar • beautiful words • strong ideas …and still fall flat. Why? Because the pacing is off. The characters aren’t consistent. The message isn’t clear. Editing isn’t about changing a writer’s voice. It’s about helping that voice come through cleanly. That’s why I focus on clarity before correctness – flow before fancy words – honesty over harsh criticism Great writing isn’t just written. It’s refined. Writers what part of editing do you struggle with the most? #WritingCommunity #BetaReaders #Proofreading #Editing #CreativeWriting
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
99% of people think ghostwriting is about writing. i used to think ghostwriting was about being a "fancy" writer. i was wrong. it’s actually about being a great listener. it started when i met people with amazing ideas, who just couldn't put them into words. they had the brain, but they didn't have the time or the patience. i became obsessed with the "mental download." i realized i could listen to someone talk for 10 minutes and turn their messy thoughts into a clear story. it’s like being a translator. ➧ i learn how they think. ➧ i learn how they speak. ➧ i put their "voice" on paper. most people want to be famous. i want to be the person behind the famous person. i don’t need my name on the post. i don’t need the "likes." i get my joy from the results. ↠ seeing a client finally feel understood. ↠ watching their message help thousands of people. ↠ knowing i was the bridge that made it happen. it’s a quiet kind of power. i’m not just writing sentences. i’m helping busy people share their truth. i love being the "secret weapon" in the shadows. What’s harder for you: thinking the idea or writing it? #LinkedInghostwriter #Personalbranding
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
God does not exit.... Did you read that right? What came to your mind? Did I deliberately write 'God does not exit'... or did I intend to say 'God does not exist'? This is exactly how typos leave readers pausing (and sometimes cringing) when they encounter errors in your content. You might get away with it occasionally, writers have creative freedom across genres and stories, but deep down, you know you rushed the manuscript without a thorough proofread. Sometimes it feels like you've won the game... until a client spots the oversight and your work suddenly looks flawed. As a proofreader, here are three non-negotiables I live by: • Don't rush • Don't be lazy about reading through your manuscript (multiple times) • Don't reserve top-tier quality only for high-paying jobs Those "small" jobs often lead to bigger opportunities through referrals, and referrals come from delivering exceptional service every single time. As a writer, (or proofreader!) what’s your go-to trick or "spice" that levels up your proofreading game?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
People overcomplicate finding their writer’s voice. If you’re a budding writer or making the jump into the writing space and you feel stuck, read this. I’ve learned this as a writer and editor: the people who sound confident have built clarity through work, not waiting. I’ve learned from writing and editing news articles, opinion pieces, magazine features and reviewing countless drafts: that most mistakes could be corrected if people put in the time and effort to hone their writing skill. Simply put, practise, practise, practise. Avoid this ❌ Waiting to “find” your voice before you write. ❌ Imitating someone else’s style to chase approval. ❌ Chasing platforms instead of mastering fundamentals. Do this instead ✅ Write the simplest version first; one-sentence idea, one-paragraph outline. ✅ Go over your work ✅ Edit with a question: “Does this help the reader?” Cut what doesn’t. Lesson: Voice emerges from clarity of thought and consistent practice. Writing rewards clarity and consistency, not confusion disguised as depth. What’s one thing you’ve been overthinking about your writing?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
There's a word I've noticed people misusing a lot recently, across a range of different types of writing. It's not an obvious one. The word is "within". More often than not, I see "within" used as a synonym for "in". So: 🦁 This will help you develop a coherent approach to feeding lions within your zoo. 🦁 It was clear we needed a different strategy for housing lions within London. 🦁 We need to provide a supportive environment for lions within our zoo system. All these examples are incorrect: they all call for "in", rather than "within". "Within" has a very specific meaning, distinct from "in": it refers to something going on inside a specific area, time frame or group of people – as opposed to outside that area, time frame or group. It's therefore much closer to "inside" than to "in". So, for example: 🦁 Within the four walls of the lion enclosure, it's acceptable to feed the lions. 🦁 Within our team of lion-feeding specialists, opinion is divided over whether lions prefer roast beef or venison. 🦁 We'll be feeding the lions within the hour. Why do I think people are defaulting to "within", rather than the supremely functional "in"? Because people always assume that two syllables are better than one. This is why people choose "utilise" when they mean "use", "leverage" when they mean "make use of" or "operationalise" when they mean "put into use". (The word "use" is excellently functional and chronically underused.) But within grammar-pedantry circles, erroneous uses of "within" can be spotted within seconds. Without doubt. #freelancewriter #educationwriter #editor #freelanceeditor #education #proofreading #grammar
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Words that mean their own opposite? Meet the contronym. English has many quirks, but contronyms (also called auto-antonyms) are among my favourites … and one of the reasons precision really matters. A contronym is a word with two meanings that contradict each other, depending entirely on context. A few examples: • Sanction → to approve ✔️ → to penalise ❌ • Oversight → careful supervision → a mistake • Dust → to remove fine particles (dust the shelves) → to add fine particles (dust a cake with icing sugar) • Left → departed → remaining (two biscuits left) Perfectly correct. Completely opposite. For writers, contronyms are a reminder that clarity doesn’t live in the word alone. It lives in context. For editors and proofreaders, they’re small red flags asking: Could this be read the wrong way? Most readers won’t consciously notice a contronym but they will notice confusion if the sentence doesn’t carry its meaning cleanly. Language is clever. Readers are busy. Precision bridges the gap. What’s your favourite contronym? Or one that’s caught you out? #writing #words #proofreading #editing #language #authors #publishers
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Funny Friday grammar tip: Spellcheck is a safety net, not a proofreader. It won’t catch form when you meant from, or accept when you meant except. And yes, I’ve seen both. In professional documents. Quick fix before you hit publish: Read your writing out loud. If your brain trips, your reader will too. Clean copy = credible authority. Happy Friday, and may your commas be intentional. 😉 #FridayFunny #Editing #GrammarMatters #Proofreading #TheEditDerr
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Funny Friday grammar tip: Spellcheck is a safety net, not a proofreader. It won’t catch form when you meant from, or accept when you meant except. And yes, I’ve seen both. In professional documents. Quick fix before you hit publish: Read your writing out loud. If your brain trips, your reader will too. Clean copy = credible authority. Happy Friday, and may your commas be intentional. 😉 #FridayFunny #Editing #GrammarMatters #Proofreading #TheEditDerr
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Funny Friday grammar tip: Spellcheck is a safety net, not a proofreader. It won’t catch form when you meant from, or accept when you meant except. And yes, I’ve seen both. In professional documents. Quick fix before you hit publish: Read your writing out loud. If your brain trips, your reader will too. Clean copy = credible authority. Happy Friday, and may your commas be intentional. 😉 #FridayFunny #Editing #GrammarMatters #Proofreading #TheEditDerr
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Funny Friday grammar tip: Spellcheck is a safety net, not a proofreader. It won’t catch form when you meant from, or accept when you meant except. And yes, I’ve seen both. In professional documents. Quick fix before you hit publish: Read your writing out loud. If your brain trips, your reader will too. Clean copy = credible authority. Happy Friday, and may your commas be intentional. 😉 #FridayFunny #Editing #GrammarMatters #Proofreading #TheEditDerr
To view or add a comment, sign in
-