Science Skills is now available in Google Antigravity as part of Gemini for Science. 🧬 This gives scientists an agentic research workbench, with access to over 30 models and databases like AlphaGenome, AlphaFold Database and UniProt - to help automate complex workflows and solve problems faster. These new tools help empower researchers to: 🔹 Use natural language to seamlessly access and integrate insights from major life science databases and tools. 🔹 Accelerate analysis pipelines, condensing hours of manual work into minutes. 🔹 Build trust with verifiable scientific artifacts, grounded in evidence. Our teams recently put it to the test on a real-world puzzle: analyzing a rare genetic disease caused by AK2 mutations. They were able to accelerate a highly complex structural analysis much faster than usual - leading to novel insights about the condition’s underlying mechanisms. Find out more → https://lnkd.in/ewjt7ZX8

Google DeepMind This is the most executive-level interpretation. This is less about “AI tools for science” and more about restructuring the discovery function itself into an AI-augmented search process over physical reality. Once hypothesis generation becomes cheap, the bottleneck shifts entirely to experimental design and verification infrastructure. That reallocation is where the real scientific acceleration happens.

Interesting shift. The breakthrough may not only be faster research, but a redefinition of where scientific value is created. Historically, scarcity was access to information and computing power. Increasingly, scarcity may become interpretation, prioritization and judgment. When AI agents can automate analysis pipelines, the challenge moves toward deciding which questions deserve attention and how evidence is translated into decisions. We may be entering an era where scientific advantage is less about producing more knowledge and more about designing better decision architectures around it. I explored a related perspective here: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/peter-guillon_intelligenceartificielle-conseilstrataezgique-ugcPost-7463210079878635520-3fEv

The key distinction for scientific AI workbenches is whether they increase expert agency or compress expert labor into management-readable artifacts. The difference is human authority over hypothesis design, verification, uncertainty, and attribution.

I love it how we are starting to use AI not as general-purpose assistants anymore, but as research infrastructure for complex domains.

AI is becoming an increasingly powerful research partner for scientists, helping automate complex workflows, accelerate discoveries, and uncover insights faster than traditional methods alone. The future of scientific innovation will be deeply connected with intelligent, evidence-driven AI systems 🧬🤖

Hey don’t ship too quickly now. I didn’t set Continuance until 2030 😁

Seriously useful for researchers. Excited to see how this evolves.

Like
Reply

amazing , this is very high level use of AI. It would help in faster and efficient research.

This is so cool! Can’t wait to try it out! Janet Matsen would be fun to explore this in addition to Claude code!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories