devtech.pro’s Post

Government agencies face unique AI accountability pressures that private sector frameworks don't address. The CAIO AI-IQ Assessment roll up will now include a government-specific lens—measuring not just technology deployment, but governance readiness, workforce trust, and the operating foundations that determine whether AI delivers measurable public value or becomes another pilot that stalls. Early participants gain three advantages: → Benchmark positioning in the first "Government AI Readiness Index" → Access to our NIST-aligned research on economic impact by sector → Priority insights as the dataset grows from 50 to 500+ agencies This isn't vendor research. It's practitioner-led assessment data from executives answering honest questions about organizational reality—without a sales agenda in the room. The agencies that shape this benchmark will have strategic intelligence no one else can replicate. Complete your assessment: Link below in the comments. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada #Amii #Mila #SovereignAI #CAIOLeadership #WorkforceInTheLoop #EdgeCompute #AIGovernance #CanadaAIFuture #CAIOAdvisoryCouncil #CIFARAIChairs #NSERCChairs Benson Chan Renil Paramel #NIST #NSF

Canada has outlined six pillars for its national AI strategy: protecting Canadians and safeguarding democracy, empowering Canadians, powering AI adoption for shared prosperity, building a sovereign AI foundation, scaling Canadian champions, and forging trusted global partnerships. CBC coverage: https://lnkd.in/eui8T_HJ Across all six, one word is implicit: trust. But trust in AI is not a value statement. It is an infrastructure requirement. It means knowing what your AI is doing, how it is doing it, what it is allowed to access, whether it is operating within policy, and whether its outputs can withstand scrutiny. At CharliAI, we have been building that infrastructure since 2020: a Governance Control Plane for accountable, traceable, and auditable AI deployment in regulated financial services. For financial institutions, regulators, government, and institutional investors, trust means more than confidence. It means evidence. Evidence that AI systems are operating within defined controls, aligned to regulation, and producing outcomes that can be reviewed, challenged, and defended. As Canada moves from AI strategy to implementation, advantage will go to those who operationalize AI governance now. For financial institutions, that means treating AI governance as foundational infrastructure, not downstream compliance. For regulators, it means translating principles into enforceable standards for control, transparency, and auditability. For investors, it means evaluating AI governance as a core driver of enterprise value and risk. Canada is ready to lead in AI. But sovereignty will depend on trust that can be built, measured, and proven. The six pillars define the “what.” Charli delivers the “how.” Richard A. Moran, Sharon Castelino, Alyssa Barry, CPIR, Carine Schneider, FGE, Joel Emery, Kevin Collins #AIGovernance #NationalAIStrategy #CanadianAI #ResponsibleAI #AIInfrastructure #FinancialServices #RegTech #CharliAI

Marc is right, this landed at the right time. Canada's six-pillar AI strategy is encouraging. But the pillar that matters most is the one that gets built, not just written down. "Building the Canadian sovereign AI foundation" is the fourth pillar. It is also the load-bearing one. The other five depend on it. You can't protect Canadians, empower adoption, or scale champions on infrastructure you don't control. I've been writing about this all spring in my AI Is an Infrastructure Problem series on LinkedIn. Seven parts. The thesis holds whether you're looking at it from a US enterprise lens or a Canadian national strategy lens. AI doesn't run on ambition. It runs on compute, connectivity, proximity, and trust boundaries that are engineered at the workload level, not assumed through policy language. Part 1 made the case that the network fabric underneath AI is the real differentiator. Part 3 showed how power and proximity are becoming competitive moats. Part 4, publishing next week, goes deeper on sovereignty as a per-workload architecture decision, not a geography checkbox. Marc's post is the policy version of the same argument. Marc puts it simply: the real impact comes down to execution. I'd sharpen that one degree further. Execution means answering the infrastructure questions no strategy document can defer. Where does the power come from? How deep is the fibre? Who controls the interconnection fabric? What happens when sovereign workloads need to reach global ecosystems without compromising residency? These aren't theoretical. They're the same questions I'll be sitting with on stage at Data Center Nation Toronto in June, and the same ones our team works through with customers every week. Canada keeps signaling the right intent. The gap between intent and production is infrastructure. Always has been. Good to see this on the agenda. Now let's build it. #CanadaAI #SovereignAI #AIInfrastructure #DigitalSovereignty #CriticalInfrastructure #Interconnection #Equinix

Canada’s direction on AI is starting to come into focus. Alongside last week's economic update, the government also outlined the six pillars of its forthcoming AI strategy, even if the full plan wasn’t included in the document itself. The direction reflects what we’ve been hearing more broadly. Canadians want AI that is trusted, useful, and creates real economic value. That’s an important signal. Of course, this is just the starting point. The real impact will come down to how these priorities are executed. One area to watch is the focus on sovereign AI infrastructure. AI doesn’t run on ambition alone. It depends on compute, connectivity, and access to ecosystems. Getting that foundation right will be key if Canada wants to turn this vision into something tangible. Encouraging to see this on the agenda. Now it’s about follow-through. #CanadaAI #DigitalSovereignty #Connectivity #CriticalInfrastructure #TrustInAI Aaron Magnan, MBA; Andrew Eppich; Bridget McFarlane; Dan Machado; Danny Galor; Erika Hudec, MHRM; Joseph Arbour; Kristen Senechal; Marilyn Trudeau; Mike LaPalme; Olga Karamichailidis; Sanjeevan Srikrishnan; Shalina Patel; Shauna Summers PMP® FMP®; Valeska Mengert https://lnkd.in/e7KN4JZz

The Government of Canada just dropped crucial guidance on the Use of Agentic Artificial Intelligence, and it is a must-read for anyone looking to scale autonomous agents responsibly.  As we move from static chatbots to autonomous, multi-agent systems that can break down tasks, collaborate, use external tools, and pursue long-term goals, the guardrails must evolve. Agentic AI inherits all the core risks of GenAI (privacy, bias, security) - but adds a layer of complexity regarding autonomy and delegation.  The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat outlines a very pragmatic framework for when organizations should consider agentic AI:  🎯 Defined Outcomes: Intended goals and outcomes must be perfectly clear. 🚧 Explicit Boundaries: Decision and action boundaries must be strictly mapped out. ✍️ Clear Accountability: Ownership and accountability must be explicitly designated to a human. 🛡️ Continuous Testing: Risks must be tested, monitored, and managed across the entire system lifecycle.  The Golden Rule for Public Sector & Enterprise AI: Agentic AI is most effective in tightly scoped, internal workflows with limited permissions. AI agents should run with clearly labeled activity permission levels (e.g., “draft only” or “read only”), ensuring that human public servants maintain the final authority on consequential actions.  Autonomous capability requires heightened accountability. If you are building or deploying agentic systems this year, this guide is an excellent blueprint for balancing innovation with strict risk mitigation.  👇 Check out the official guide in comments. #ArtificialIntelligence #AgenticAI #TechGovernance #ResponsibleAI #DigitalGovernment #PublicSector #Innovation

Statistics Canada confirmed it: only 12,3% of Canadian businesses are using AI in their operations. 🤔   That gap is the real story.    👀It means that right now, in Canada, being an early mover is still possible. Most markets in Europe and the US have already closed this window.    But here's what we consistently see in the organizations we work with: the challenge isn't finding an AI tool. Tools are everywhere. The challenge is knowing what to build before you deploy one.    ❌ Three things that actually block AI adoption in Canadian organizations:    — The data isn't ready. Processes exist in people's heads, not in documented systems.  — The team isn't trained before the tool goes live.  — Legal compliance (PIPEDA, Loi 25 in Quebec) is treated as an afterthought.    None of these are technology problems. They're structural problems — and they're solvable.    📑The organizations that address these first don't struggle with adoption. Because when the tool goes live, the people using it already understand what it's supposed to do.    ⁉Are you building the right foundation first? #ArtificialIntelligence #AIAdoption #Canada #HRTech #TechLeaders 

Was great attending the APPG AI session on AI & Technology Sovereignty: Strategic Dependence and National Capability at Parliament yesterday. A timely and important discussion on what “sovereign AI” should actually mean for the UK. AI sovereignty is not about isolation, it’s about capability, leverage, and choice. A few reflections that particularly stood out to me: ✅ AI is rapidly becoming national infrastructure As Professor Ashley Braganza noted, decisions made today will shape the next generation of AI capability, governance, and economic power. The UK may sit between US and Chinese superpowers, but there was a strong argument that we can still out-govern through policy, transparency, and strategic coordination. ✅ Sovereignty exists across the entire AI stack From compute and procurement to data, talent, infrastructure, and regulation, sovereignty is not binary. Several speakers highlighted that governments must consciously decide where to build domestic capability and where strategic dependence is acceptable. ✅ Procurement may be one of the UK’s strongest levers. Both Dr Neel Savani and Leo Rogers emphasised the role of public procurement in strengthening UK AI capability, particularly by enabling domestic startups to access contracts, scale, and compete globally. ✅ Data sovereignty is becoming increasingly critical. Dan Patten raised an important point: if foundational models are trained primarily on external norms and datasets, can we truly embed UK public values into AI systems afterwards? The choices we make around data governance today will shape future public services, healthcare, planning, and civic infrastructure. ✅ AI sovereignty is also a societal question Dr Susan Oman brought an essential people-centred perspective to the discussion. Sovereignty is not only about control, it is also about who benefits, who participates, and whose interests are reflected in the systems being built. AI literacy, public trust, and meaningful inclusion are all part of the infrastructure conversation. One point I found especially compelling was the idea that sovereignty should be treated as a direction of travel, rather than a fixed destination. The question is not whether the UK can build every layer independently, but whether we understand our dependencies, retain strategic leverage, and make deliberate choices aligned with national interests. Thank you to the APPG AI organisers and speakers for a thoughtful and nuanced discussion. #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #AISovereignty #AIGovernance #ResponsibleAI #PublicPolicy #TechnologyPolicy #DigitalSovereignty #Innovation #AIRegulation #UKTech

Six Pillars of Canada's National AI Strategy (the 5th may be of interest to Canadian businesses): 1) Protecting Canadians and safeguarding our democracy 2) Empowering Canadians 3) Powering AI adoption for shared prosperity 4) Building the Canadian sovereign AI foundation 5) Scaling Canadian champions (eg. Distinct AI) 6) Building trusted partnerships and global alliances #CanadaAI #NationalAIStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence #AIPolicy #AIinCanada

We’re working on something practical and overdue. 💃 💃 An AI Implementation Playbook for Africa’s Inclusive Financial Institutions. This playbook is built to help MFIs, cooperatives, and credit unions: • Move from AI curiosity to real execution • Modernize digital foundations that AI depends on • Design and deploy responsible AI systems • Establish governance that prevents risk before it happens • Use AI to deepen inclusion, not widen the gap Over the coming weeks, we’ll share practical insights, field-tested frameworks, and tools drawn directly from this work in progress. Let’s build the future. Not just talk about it. #AIImplementation #DigitalFinanceAfrica #NangeviaSolutions #FinancialInclusion #AfricaTech

Policy is no longer a support function in AI adoption. It is the accelerator. As Africa moves from AI conversations to real implementation, the quality of our regulatory frameworks, institutional readiness, and public private collaboration will determine whether innovation scales or stalls. A timely conversation on why policy execution, not just ambition, will shape Africa’s AI future as explained in my recent piece on Business Daily Africa. #FullArticle: https://lnkd.in/duazYTJJ #Credit: Business Daily Africa