The latest from my colleague Julia Gledhill (she/her): "The acquisition reform movement of the 1990s offers lessons for policymakers currently working to reduce regulatory oversight of the weapons acquisition system. These changes risk diminishing competition and increasing prices on military contracts, with uncertain benefits for both the military industrial base and U.S. taxpayers. Unless policymakers critically assess the impacts of 1990s reforms, they will likely amplify inefficiencies in the weapons acquisition system." https://lnkd.in/eP9kuyxC
Lessons from 1990s acquisition reform for military contracts
This title was summarized by AI from the post below.
More Relevant Posts
-
🚨 Defense Acquisition Reform Takes Center Stage 🚨 Two major bills—the SPEED Act and the FoRGED Act—are set to reshape how the Pentagon buys and fields technology. The following article from IDGA takes a look at the legislation and how they might be reflected in this year's NDAA. #Defense #AcquisitionReform #NDAA #SPEEDAct #FoRGEDAct #NationalSecurity https://lnkd.in/eE5q4h5M
-
Some firms will thrive at the intersection of defense and commercial markets. Many won’t. Sherman Williams II explains why. Listen here: https://lnkd.in/gp8CHB6F
-
The US Department of Defense’s (DOD) designation of DJI as a “Chinese Military Company” under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) highlights the expanding US focus on identifying companies viewed as contributing to foreign defense industrial bases. The recent District of Columbia federal court decision upholding that designation underscores both the difficulty, and the potential viability, of challenging such determinations. Read more here: https://ow.ly/PNpK50XbhjU
-
The US Department of Defense’s (DOD) designation of DJI as a “Chinese Military Company” under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) highlights the expanding US focus on identifying companies viewed as contributing to foreign defense industrial bases. The recent District of Columbia federal court decision upholding that designation underscores both the difficulty, and the potential viability, of challenging such determinations. Read more here: https://ow.ly/lGbe50XaHWM
-
The US Department of Defense’s (DOD) designation of DJI as a “Chinese Military Company” under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) highlights the expanding US focus on identifying companies viewed as contributing to foreign defense industrial bases. The recent District of Columbia federal court decision upholding that designation underscores both the difficulty, and the potential viability, of challenging such determinations. https://ow.ly/Ma4U50XaFxf
-
The US Department of Defense’s (DOD) designation of DJI as a “Chinese Military Company” under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) highlights the expanding US focus on identifying companies viewed as contributing to foreign defense industrial bases. The recent District of Columbia federal court decision upholding that designation underscores both the difficulty, and the potential viability, of challenging such determinations. Read more here: https://ow.ly/CIet50XbYU2
-
The US Department of Defense’s (DOD) designation of DJI as a “Chinese Military Company” under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) highlights the expanding US focus on identifying companies viewed as contributing to foreign defense industrial bases. The recent District of Columbia federal court decision upholding that designation underscores both the difficulty, and the potential viability, of challenging such determinations. Read more here: https://ow.ly/Tknf50XaH7L
-
The US Department of Defense’s (DOD) designation of DJI as a “Chinese Military Company” under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) highlights the expanding US focus on identifying companies viewed as contributing to foreign defense industrial bases. The recent District of Columbia federal court decision upholding that designation underscores both the difficulty, and the potential viability, of challenging such determinations. Read more here: https://ow.ly/8jus50Xb7bT
-
The US Department of Defense’s (DOD) designation of DJI as a “Chinese Military Company” under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) highlights the expanding US focus on identifying companies viewed as contributing to foreign defense industrial bases. The recent District of Columbia federal court decision upholding that designation underscores both the difficulty, and the potential viability, of challenging such determinations. Read more here: https://ow.ly/cGWs50XbbKr
-
The US Department of Defense’s (DOD) designation of DJI as a “Chinese Military Company” under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) highlights the expanding US focus on identifying companies viewed as contributing to foreign defense industrial bases. The recent District of Columbia federal court decision upholding that designation underscores both the difficulty, and the potential viability, of challenging such determinations. Read more here: https://ow.ly/18tN50XaHtv
Seems that an acquisition-driven Pentagon strategy hinders national security, promoting DOD unreadiness, Congressional-inducing waste (AKA money slathering of states), underwriting the DOD revolving door, and setting the stage for perpetual cost overruns.