Everyone thought we were getting artificial intelligence. What we got was artificial creativity. And that’s why it feels so unsettling. Years ago, I’d ask: which jobs will AI never replace? The answer was always creative ones. We were wrong. → If AI can create, what’s left as the human edge? #ArtificialIntelligence #FutureOfWork #CreativeAI #Innovation

The human edge is now about taste and judgment, not just production.

Well said. The edge moves from creating to deciding Martin.

The video highlighted points many overlook, great work sharing it.

Judgement, Inspiration and Taste

Like
Reply

The unsettling part isn’t that AI can create, it’s that it creates without stakes. Humans still carry consequences, and that changes how ideas are shaped

This is a genuinely useful reframe. "Artificial creativity" sets more honest expectations — it's excellent at producing outputs that look intelligent, but the underlying process is pattern synthesis, not reasoning from first principles. The interesting question now is whether that distinction matters in practice for most use cases. For many tasks, fluent output is sufficient. But for decisions that require accountability, causal reasoning, or navigating genuinely novel situations, the gap becomes critical. The professionals who understand where that line is will have a real edge.

That distinction hits differently than it first appears. Creativity without judgment, taste, or stakes is just pattern recombination. What we actually needed was something that could reason about tradeoffs and make decisions under uncertainty - the intelligence part. We got a very good remix engine instead.

we are moving from the era of 'The Creator' to 'The Curator.'

Like
Reply

They cant perform it yet. Theatre for now....lets see how human like we want robots to become..

Nothing can beat human creativity

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories