Compensation conversations require clarity — and clarity starts with good data. That’s where a salary survey comes in. A well-conducted compensation study helps boards and managers make informed, equitable decisions. It grounds pay discussions in reality, not guesswork, and provides an external benchmark that builds trust between boards, executives, and staff. But not all salary surveys are created equal. If you’re choosing a partner to conduct one, don’t just ask who can run the numbers. Ask who understands the people behind them. Here’s what to look for: 1. Credibility and context. Your partner should have experience with nonprofits of your size, sector, and budget scope. A $2M human services nonprofit and a $120M international NGO live in different universes — your compensation survey should reflect that. 2. Transparent methodology. Ask where the data comes from, how it’s normalized, and what benchmarks they’ll compare you to. A good partner can explain it simply and won’t hide behind jargon. 3. Discretion and trust. Salary data is sensitive. Choose someone who understands confidentiality — and who will handle the process with the same care they’d want for their own team. 4. Alignment with values. A salary survey isn’t just about numbers. It’s about fairness, belonging, and sustainability. Find a partner who respects those as much as accuracy. 5. Guidance, not just a report. The best firms don’t just hand you a spreadsheet. They interpret what it means — and help your board translate data into decisions that reflect your mission and culture. Salary surveys done well create more than pay equity. They create peace of mind — for boards, executives, and the people who make the mission possible. If your organization is preparing to review compensation this year, we’d be honored to help you find the right approach — one grounded in both data and dignity. – At CoSpire, we offer custom compensation surveys to help nonprofits understand what’s working, what’s not, and what’s most meaningful to the people they serve. Our values shape every part of the process: 🔸Creativity: Holding truth and hope in tension. 🔸Courage: Asking brave questions with care. 🔸Community: Honoring every voice. 🔸Compassion: Working toward what’s possible — together. If those values resonate with you, we’d be honored to listen. DM us and start a conversation.
How to Choose a Compensation Survey Partner for Nonprofits
More Relevant Posts
-
Are compensation budgets holding steady… or getting stuck? 💰 According to Mercer’s latest U.S. Compensation Planning survey, most companies are projecting flat increases for 2026 — around 3.1% for merit and 3.5% for total salary. We are hearing these s What’s behind the caution? 👉 20% of U.S. companies say ongoing economic uncertainty will significantly impact compensation decisions. 👉 Nearly 90% report that budgets are still preliminary, meaning there’s potential for adjustments before year-end. We’re seeing this firsthand with our clients — many are taking a cautious, wait-and-see approach — and we’re hearing it from candidates, who prioritize stability and long-term growth over big salary jumps. Take a look at this article for the full breakdown — and I’d love to hear your thoughts: how are you approaching compensation planning heading into 2026? ⬇️ ⬇️ : https://loom.ly/PA3XULc #talentstrategy #compensation #salarybudget #compensationplanning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Autumn Budget 2026: What does it really mean for finance leaders? With rising employment costs, a likely increase to the National Minimum Wage, and new compliance pressures from the Employment Rights Bill, this year’s Autumn Budget could significantly reshape workforce planning and cost forecasting. According to Hays’ latest insights, 77% of employers still plan to hire in 2026, but over half expect to revise their hiring strategies due to cost pressures. For finance leaders, that means balancing growth ambitions with tighter margins, and potentially rethinking how teams are structured. 📌How are you planning to adapt your workforce strategy in light of these changes? 📌 Are you leaning more on temp/contract models, or doubling down on retention and upskilling? 👉 Read the full breakdown here: 2026 Autumn Budget: What Every Employer and Professional Needs to Know #FinanceLeadership #AutumnBudget2026 #CFOInsights #WorkforcePlanning #HaysUK
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Pay transparency isn’t coming. It’s here. 14 states already require employers to post pay ranges, and 10 more are close behind. The shift is happening faster than most realize, and it is reshaping how small employers, including dental practices, compete for talent. Between staffing shortages, rising costs, and patient care demands, compliance can feel like one more burden to manage. But when candidates are already comparing offers by pay and transparency, staying silent on compensation isn’t just risky. It’s a missed opportunity. When you define and communicate pay ranges with intention, you set clear expectations, build internal trust, and attract people who value integrity and structure. Here’s how to stay ahead of the curve: 👉 Build or audit your pay structure. If one exists, evaluate it against reliable local data. If not, create a structure that aligns with your roles and business goals. 👉 Define your ranges. Create internal consistency so employees see fairness, not favoritism. 👉 Document your framework. Ensure pay decisions are consistent, explainable, and defensible. 👉 Communicate the right information to your team. Transparency starts within. Share enough to build confidence and trust in how compensation is handled. Pay transparency isn’t the enemy of small practices. It’s a competitive advantage for those willing to embrace it. Don't know where to start? We simplify compensation so you can focus on what matters most.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Gen Z is reshaping the rules of work — and pay is just the starting point. In a new Newsweek article, Compt CEO Amy Spurling shares her perspective on how younger workers are challenging traditional expectations around salaries, flexibility, and meaning at work. Their message is clear: compensation matters, but so does how work fits into life. Read the full piece: https://hubs.li/Q03RpwP80
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
There was a time when pay wasn’t supposed to be openly discussed. Once upon a time, pre the rise of Glassdoor, TikTok, Reddit, LinkedIn (and locally - MalaysianPAYGAP); employers were able to hold most of the cards. Pay is seen as a "management tool", and secrecy helped preserve managerial power. The thinking around compensation is "labor cost management" rather than "talent optimization." The goal is simple: minimize cost, maximize output. I also realized many local business owners - both small and large - believe that employees don't need to know about how pay is decided and distributed because if they did, they would cause trouble. Fairness is suppose to be defined by the company, not by shared understanding. But the tide is turning: -It is less 'taboo' now to talk about pay. -Trust in institutions are in decline. -Acquiring and retaining the right people in the current talent landscape is more challenging than ever. That's probably why Mercer’s Global Pay Transparency Report says 57% of companies worldwide are actively assessing the competitiveness of their pay structures and WTW’s 2025 Pay Transparency Report found that 86% of organizations are already sharing, planning to share, or considering sharing pay-range information with employees and external applicants. Here's what I think most people miss: pay transparency isn't a threat - it can be a "thrust" for companies. We want more from people: performance, ownership, effort - and transparency is one of the cleanest ways to get it. When employees can see the rules of the game clearly, they might stop spending energy wondering if the game is rigged - and that reclaimed energy can flow back into the business. BUT ... transparency does not justify being "purely transactional." It's not as simple as "Well, now that I pay more, I can demand more." It might be surprising to hear, but money alone doesn't make everyone engaged. (Even if that is what they are demanding) Don't underestimate the other "levers" in your benefits arsenal such as giving meaning, growth, well-being, recognition and autonomy. Provide people with what they actually value, not what we think they would appreciate - that's where great organizations pull ahead. Here's what I think helps: 1. Publish clear salary bands internally. -Show how progression works. Clarity reduces noise. Noise kills performance. 2. Conduct annual pay-equity reviews. - Not just gender — but role, tenure, function, performance. 3. Train leaders to talk about compensation confidently. - Most managers handle these conversations poorly because they aren't properly equipped for it. 4. Build benefits around actual needs, not assumptions. - Ask your people. Sometimes the most valued benefits cost the least. 5. Anchor transparency to a performance narrative. -Make it clear: “We expect high performance — and we’re committed to fairness, clarity, and support.” Both truths can co-exist. This is a #FactFriday post.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Pay hasn’t changed in 60 years and it’s costing employees dearly. Almost everything in life has become instant and on-demand except pay. 📊 More than half of UK employees say money worries affect their work. 💳 1 in 4 adults are financially vulnerable. 💸 UK households paid £84.5bn in interest last year just to bridge the gap between paydays. It’s clear: the traditional monthly pay cycle isn’t just outdated. It’s holding people back. Aslan is helping to accelerate pay into the 21st century. That means rethinking not just how much people earn but how and when they access it. James Gozney has been talking to HR magazine on this subject: https://lnkd.in/eYQ4Dwq5 #FinancialWellbeing #Payroll #HRInnovation #EmployeeExperience
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Doing more with less sounds admirable… until you’re actually living it. This year, I lost 50% of my payroll administrators to a reduction in force. The work didn’t shrink with the team, it just shifted to fewer shoulders. Payroll doesn’t stop for staffing changes. People still need to be paid accurately, taxes still need to be reconciled, and compliance deadlines don’t shift just because headcount does. So we do what payroll professionals always do: we find a way. We absorb more. We work longer hours. We double-check everything because mistakes affect people’s livelihoods. But here’s the one thing I know for sure. Doing more with less can’t be a long-term strategy. It leads to burnout, turnover, and loss of institutional knowledge that’s hard to replace. Payroll teams are some of the most resilient professionals out there. We’ll rise to the challenge (we always do), but organizations need to recognize the cost of “leaning out” critical functions like payroll. As we head into year-end, I know I’m not the only one staring down the chaos with a smaller team and the same (if not higher) expectations. To everyone in payroll making it happen — I see you. We may be fewer in number, but our impact remains the same: keeping the organization running, one paycheck at a time.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Today’s the day - Massachusetts Pay Transparency is officially here. Starting October 29, 2025, employers with 25 or more Massachusetts-based employees are now required to include salary or hourly pay ranges in all job postings, and to share those ranges with employees upon request or during promotions. This legislation, officially titled “An Act Relative to Salary Range Transparency,” isn’t just another compliance box to check. It’s a reflection of where the workplace is heading: toward clarity, equity, and trust. From a recruiter’s perspective, this shift brings both challenge and opportunity: ➡️It challenges organizations to take a closer look at their compensation strategy and internal equity. ➡️It creates an opportunity to differentiate, because transparent, data-driven pay practices build credibility with both candidates and employees. At The Nagler Group, we’ve already begun helping clients align job postings, compensation frameworks, and messaging to reflect not only compliance but culture. Pay transparency isn’t just about numbers; it’s about trust, alignment, and leadership. How your organization approaches this change will say a lot about your values and the kind of employer you strive to be. If your team is navigating how to adapt, benchmark, or communicate these changes effectively, let’s connect - we’re here to help. 📧drolli@naglergroup.com 📖 Learn more here: https://lnkd.in/ezu4KQiX #PayTransparency #Massachusetts #HRStrategy #Recruiting #Compensation #Leadership #TheNaglerGroup #BostonHR
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A transparency I have personally communicated to leaders and companies I serve, the median is a point in time and a generalized direction - not the strategy. With moving targets and varying degrees of talent, be mindful, be purposeful, be intentional, and be transparent with the behind the scene mechanics (who, what, where, WHY???). Be objective, be fair, but most importantly - be consistent and communicative.
Global Compensation & Benefits Leader | Human Resources Consultant | Coach | Driving Reward Strategy, Mobility & Project Excellence | International, Temp & Project-based
𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 & 𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐬: 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐨𝐚𝐥 In Compensation & Benefits, we talk a lot about Compa-Ratios, market data, and quartiles. But one number tends to get too much attention: the median (P50). Many treat it as the “right” or “fair” pay level — but that’s a misunderstanding. ⸻ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐚 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 By definition, the median simply means: ➡️ Half of the market pays below, and half pays above. That’s all. It doesn’t tell you: Which companies are in the data set. What industries or geographies they represent. How roles are defined or leveled. Or whether their business models, performance, or pay philosophies are remotely similar to yours. In other words: the median is a number without context — and without context, it’s a weak benchmark. And most of all, it doesn’t tell you which market position you should aim for ! ⸻ 𝐔𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐜𝐮𝐭 Before making pay decisions based on market data, ask: What sample was used? (Industry, size, geography?) Are we looking at base salary, total cash, or total direct comp? Which job families or levels were matched? How was the data aged or adjusted? The same job can appear underpaid or overpaid depending on how the data cut is made. That’s why interpreting surveys requires technical understanding and judgment, not just math. ⸻ 𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭 Paying at the median isn’t a strategy — it’s a default. A strong C&B approach defines why you position at a certain quartile, for which roles, and with what intent. For scarce, high-impact talent, above-market pay may be strategic. For roles with a strong internal pipeline, pay at or below market may make sense. For critical skills, a mix of cash and long-term incentives may align interests better than just base pay. Also, ask yourself - probably most importantly of all - what is your philosophy around compensation, meaning How do you, and how should everyone in the company, think about your comp & ben structure ? How do you want to be seen, externally and internally, from a pay perspective ? How can you guarantee fair pay and be able to communicate clearly what you do ? And - not to be forgotten - what can your company actually afford ? ⸻ 𝐌𝐲 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 Market medians are helpful — but only when used with insight. The real value lies in understanding the data, interpreting it in context, and linking it to your talent philosophy. In other words: Don’t aim for the median. Aim for alignment. ⸻ 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮 How does your organization use market data — as guidance, or as a target? ⸻ #CompensationAndBenefits #TotalRewards #PeopleStrategy #PayEquity #MarketBenchmarking #HRStrategy #Leadership #DataDrivenHR
To view or add a comment, sign in
-