READ. YOUR. CONTRACTS. UNDERSTAND. YOUR. CONTRACTS. NEGOTIATE. YOUR. CONTRACTS. The practice of publishing an edited piece without a freelancer's approval is both extremely common and potentially extremely risky for the writer depending entirely on the contract. Editors rarely if ever know what's in the contract you've signed because it was drawn up by the legal department, so they don't know that—depending on what's in the warranties and representations sections as well as the indemnification section—publishing changes without the writer's approval if the contract places the legal responsibility for factual accuracy on the writer is extremely risky for the writer. Freelance writers, you are running a business and working in an industry that exposes you to legal risk. It's on you to understand your contract, negotiate it, and manage the editing process in a way that doesn't expose you to legal risk. Client's won't do it for you—it's not their job and most editors can't read a contract either.
Veteran freelance writers: Is publishing an edited piece without the writer's approval a common practice? I've recently experienced this twice in two different new-to-me writing niches, and it has caught me off guard. In one case, the piece was almost entirely rewritten and was given a completely new title. Honestly, it feels like fraud to claim it as mine, even though it has my byline. Please share your experiences with various editing processes.
Asking questions takes vulnerability. Using someone's vulnerability as an exemplar without permission is inconsiderate.