86,000 lines of code. 2 developers. 2 months. AI wrote most of it. The throughput story isn't "2x faster." It's the same speed, with the effort redistributed. Writing code was never the hard part. Thinking Awas. And thinking, AI still can't do for you. The honest numbers from shipping a production AI chatbot entirely with AI coding tools, what worked, what hallucinated, and what we'd change → https://antt.me/etCxzsWn #AIInProduction #DeveloperProductivity #CodingWithAI
AntStack’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
One subtle effect of AI coding tools: they can slowly make a codebase sound like five different people at once Naming changes patterns drift abstractions multiply comments become uneven local consistency starts disappearing Nothing breaks immediately. But the codebase starts feeling less like a system and more like a collage. AI makes style drift easier. Which means engineering taste matters more, not less. #AI #SoftwareEngineering #CodeQuality #DeveloperExperience #Engineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Your team can use five AI coding tools and still have no shared process. paqad-ai gives those tools the same project instructions instead of letting each one guess. This is the quiet problem behind AI tool sprawl. One developer asks one agent. Another developer asks another. A third tool writes a fix that follows a different convention. Each answer can look reasonable on its own. Then the codebase becomes the place where those differences collide. The useful question is not which AI tool is the winner. It is whether the tools are working from the same understanding of the project. #AIEngineering #DevWorkflow #SoftwareTeams
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Simply saying the software engineers and developers that will fail in the Age of AI is the same ones who were copying/pasting from stack overflow before 5 years (or other ways), same concept different tool and way of doing something without knowing what is actually happening And actually it is now even worse ! #vibe_coding #Ai #VibeCoding #Stackoverflow
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The AI coding productivity pitch will ask you to count lines shipped per day. Six months of aggressive agent use will ask you to explain why you cannot debug the codebase you built. Anthropic published research documenting a 47% drop in debugging skills among developers who leaned heavily on AI coding agents. The finding that made it uncomfortable: supervising an AI agent well requires the exact debugging skills that atrophy from using one. You need the skill to catch what the agent gets wrong. Using the agent is what costs you the skill. The practical version lands when the agent goes down for maintenance and nobody on the team can touch the code without it. The code ran. The mental model was never built. The fix is not to stop using agents. Write 20 to 100% of each implementation yourself. Use the model for planning. Never generate more in a session than you can read and understand before moving to the next task. Full breakdown in the comments. #AI #SoftwareEngineering #CodingTools #ClaudeCode #Development
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Four teams at the company. Four codebases. Same error-handling pattern in all of them. Same variable names. Same retry logic. Same subtle bug. Nobody copied from anybody. They all used the same AI coding assistant. We talk about AI making developers faster. We don't talk about AI making every developer the same developer. A senior engineer spotted it during a PR review. "This looks familiar," she said. Not because she'd seen the code before. Because the AI writes error recovery the same way every time, silently swallowing a timeout exception that matters in production. Three teams. Same bug. None caught it in review. The code looked clean, idiomatic, correct. It followed every best practice except the one the model was trained to ignore. When you funnel diverse engineers through one model trained on one corpus, you get monoculture. Monocultures don't fail gracefully. They fail everywhere at once. Ask your team: when was the last time two engineers solved the same problem differently? If you can't remember, your AI tool isn't augmenting your team. It's replacing it with one developer who never questions its own assumptions. #AI #SoftwareEngineering #CodeQuality #EngineeringManagement #DeveloperProductivity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
AI-assisted coding is fast. But AI doesn't know your system. It writes code that looks perfect in isolation and silently breaks something three layers away. The faster you ship with AI, the more you need integration tests, not less. #dotnet #csharp #backend #testing #ai #softwaredevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
AI can write your API. But can it scale, survive failures, or keep your data clean? Code is easy. Systems that work? That’s the hard part. #AI #API #Scalability #SystemDesign #Reliability #Coding #Anthropic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
AI coding tools are making developers 19% slower. A METR study found that experienced developers thought they were 20% more productive. That's a 39-point gap. The reason isn't model quality. Code has the "how" context but not the "why". AI reads the code. It has no access to what shaped it. So AI confidently (re)writes the wrong thing. Days later, something breaks downstream that nobody can trace back to a Tuesday afternoon vibe coding session. There's a missing piece here. We’re building it. Stay tuned @quarkmemory. #AIcoding #SoftwareEngineering #DevProductivity #quarkmemory
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Vibe Coding is shipping faster and breaking slower A word to junior developers: Do not outsource your understanding. Use AI as an accelerator, not a replacement for thinking. If you cannot explain what the code does, debug it without AI, or defend its architecture like you own it. The developers who will lead the next decade are those who use AI with judgment, not just with prompts. Build fast. But build with accountability. #AI #SoftwareEngineering #TechLeadership #VibeCoding #TechnicalDebt #JuniorDevelopers #AIStrategy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
AI coding agents don't fail loudly. They fail convincingly. The code compiles. It looks clean. It passes review. And it's grounded in docs that no longer apply. I've been thinking about this problem for a while — version drift, doc drift, and "correct-looking" answers that quietly break your stack. Wrote up the full breakdown, including why I built NerdyGeek to fix it: #AIEngineering #DeveloperTools #ClaudeCode #MCP
To view or add a comment, sign in