"We’re only hiring exceptional candidates" I hear this a lot from early-stage founders lately. But when I ask what exceptional actually means, there’s usually a long pause. Is it FAANG? A top 5 CS degree? A résumé that screams “IPO veteran”? In our experience helping dozens of startups hire their first few engineers, exceptional means something very different at the early stage. It’s not prestige. It’s not perfection. It’s this: -Autonomous and doesn’t need hand-holding -Communicates clearly—even when things are messy -Thrives in ambiguity and constant change -Doesn’t wait for specs—helps write them -Can ship fast and learn even faster -Balances scrappiness with technical judgment -It's okay being the only engineer on a call, a sprint, or a fire drill We’ve seen engineers without elite logos outperform those with them, not because they’re “better,” but because they were a better fit for the stage. Startups don’t need specialists in navigating corporate org charts, they need builders who can think in first principles, wear many hats, and move without waiting for permission. So if you’re hiring and holding out for “exceptional,” define it through the lens of what your company needs today, not what might look good on paper. Let’s stop chasing the wrong signal. The right hire, at the right stage, is exceptional.
Love this take, Alfonso✨️
Good point Alfonso Tiscareno. I believe those traits are universally valuable. Organizations at any development stage will benefit from them
True builders! 💪
Real email from a fintech founder I chose not to do business with. "We look for 10x programmers. Spam me and I'll ghost."