An important discussion in venture capital these days is the industry's shift towards consensus investing and its fusion with politics and government at scale. We've been thinking / writing about those shifts for years and now the discussion is heating up. In my essay below (link in first comment) I discuss how consensus capital and the “venture industrial complex” funnel money toward incremental sameness—and why heresy still matters. Some core themes are: • Convergence across culture, tech, and policy reduces variance and outliers. • Big Venture coordinates capital, regulation, and narratives; small funds must adapt. • Alpha hides in scarcity bottlenecks (e.g. trust, provenance, energy), unregulated domains, and ideas that spark controversy / disagreement A shout out to my team members Jonatan H. Luther-Bergquist and Alex Patow and Bob Shapiro for the discussions at our offsite this year; Also Cem Sertoglu who asked the right questions at our AGM. Thanks to our colleagues Mike Maples, Jr, Lawrence Lundy-Bryan , Sinéad O'Sullivan and David Peterson for your recent contributions to the discussion, I quoted all of you (even if I disagree with some of your conclusions :).
Alexander Lange there is only one thing that heretic investors can do - block out the noise and keep investing in heretic founders. Leave the consensus folks to their fate.
Really great thinking and contribution would love to discuss further
https://svrgn.substack.com/p/heresy-and-the-venture-industrial