How to close 5 critical hires in 90 days: Panel alignment over sourcing volume

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.

5 critical hires closed in 90 days. How? Panel alignment > sourcing volume At this web3 scaleup, sourcing wasn’t the only problem. Misalignment was. ❌ 80% drop-off at tech assessment ❌ Panels weren’t aligned ❌ Interviews were slow and inconsistent Russell, Head of People, brought us in to get things working before flooding the funnel. Here’s how we fixed it: 🔧 Aligned the panel before sourcing We co-designed role-relevant, real-world assessments with Eng leads. Clearer signal. Higher pass rates within 2 weeks. 🎯 Treated interviews like a selling process We coached panels, tightened feedback loops, and sped everything up. Candidates moved through with clarity and momentum. 🚀 Then deployed our Sourcing Engine Mapped talent pools across 4 regions, tiered by fit, and moved fast. The result? → 5 hires made (DevOps, Frontend + 3 confidential) → Candidate experience transformed → Panels aligned and fast-moving → $440k value delivered in 3 months Sourcing works best when the process doesn’t get in the way. Start with alignment. Prioritise experience. Teach your team to sell. Then scale search.

Peter Molnár

Stacks11K followers

6mo

I swear that panel alignment is responsible for at least 50% of wrong hiring decisions, from what I've seen so far. When you know what to hire and how to assess that, instantly, I start seeing light at the end of the tunnel

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories