U.S. prediction markets are legal — but most builders don’t understand how they’re licensed or how they actually operate under the law. In this video, I break down: • How prediction markets are regulated in the U.S. • What licenses and frameworks apply Watch here: https://ow.ly/GAtj50YhpKM #crypto #predictionmarkets #web3 #fintech #regulation
U.S. Prediction Market Regulation Explained
More Relevant Posts
-
U.S. prediction markets are legal — but most builders don’t understand how they’re licensed or how they actually operate under the law. In this video, I break down: • How prediction markets are regulated in the U.S. • What licenses and frameworks apply Watch here: https://ow.ly/SbIe50YhpKK #crypto #predictionmarkets #web3 #fintech #regulation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
U.S. prediction markets are legal — but most builders don’t understand how they’re licensed or how they actually operate under the law. In this video, I break down: • How prediction markets are regulated in the U.S. • What licenses and frameworks apply Watch here: https://ow.ly/E9Pl50YhpKH #crypto #predictionmarkets #web3 #fintech #regulation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Sharing a fascinating clip that cuts right to the heart of regulatory fairness in the modern financial landscape. It offers a stark look at accountability. Here are the core contrasts highlighted in this powerful story: Established banks navigate known cash-for-drugs transactions with near total impunity. Yet, an early builder facilitating novel digital assets faced potential decades in prison over similar, albeit decentralized, transaction chains. This deeply unequal standard forces us to question where the system draws its line between established power and necessary technological innovation. It's a crucial moment to discuss fairness in finance. What precedents do you think this uneven enforcement sets for decentralized finance today? I invite you to comment and share your own perspective! #FinTech #Regulation #BusinessEthics #Innovation #Crypto #Leadership
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝗪𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗖𝗔 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗦𝗘𝗖 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴. MiCA requires specificity on timelines, funding allocation, milestones, and governance. Under that framework, the same type of information is exactly what the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission weighs when assessing investment contract risk. The more specific the disclosure, the higher the regulatory exposure. The SEC's taxonomy is more nuanced than many expected, and that is a positive step. But it also means that disclosure strategy can no longer be jurisdiction-agnostic. Reverse solicitation doesn't fix this. Issuers need to tailor their communications to each jurisdiction rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach. We took a closer look at that tension on our blog, including where the two frameworks align, where they diverge, and what European and Swiss issuers may want to keep in mind. Armin Kaiser · Christian Meisser · Irina Langenegger · Lars Fidan · Maximilian K. · Peter Singh · Stephan D. Meyer · Yannick Bucher
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗷𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻? On 17 March 2026, the SEC and CFTC established a five-category token taxonomy. Most crypto assets are not securities. For European issuers, that sounds like relief. The problem sits one layer deeper. MiCA requires a whitepaper before any public token offering. That whitepaper must include, among other things: 🔵 Project timelines 🔵 Funding allocation 🔵 Development milestones 🔵 Team descriptions All mandatory under EU law. Under the new SEC framework, that same information is precisely what can turn a non-security into an investment contract. Reverse solicitation does not fix this. One document cannot satisfy both regimes. We mapped out where the systems align, where they collide, and what European and Swiss issuers should do now. Link in the comments. How are you navigating the tension between MiCA disclosure obligations and US securities law? Share your thoughts in the comments. #Crypto #MiCA #SEC #TokenizedSecurities #CryptoRegulation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
One of the more rewarding aspects of working at LEXR is the close alignment with international peers - a US securities specialist and MiCA expert are just a slack message away, leading to great cross-border insights!
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗷𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻? On 17 March 2026, the SEC and CFTC established a five-category token taxonomy. Most crypto assets are not securities. For European issuers, that sounds like relief. The problem sits one layer deeper. MiCA requires a whitepaper before any public token offering. That whitepaper must include, among other things: 🔵 Project timelines 🔵 Funding allocation 🔵 Development milestones 🔵 Team descriptions All mandatory under EU law. Under the new SEC framework, that same information is precisely what can turn a non-security into an investment contract. Reverse solicitation does not fix this. One document cannot satisfy both regimes. We mapped out where the systems align, where they collide, and what European and Swiss issuers should do now. Link in the comments. How are you navigating the tension between MiCA disclosure obligations and US securities law? Share your thoughts in the comments. #Crypto #MiCA #SEC #TokenizedSecurities #CryptoRegulation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗷𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻? On 17 March 2026, the SEC and CFTC established a five-category token taxonomy. Most crypto assets are not securities. For European issuers, that sounds like relief. The problem sits one layer deeper. MiCA requires a whitepaper before any public token offering. That whitepaper must include, among other things: 🔵 Project timelines 🔵 Funding allocation 🔵 Development milestones 🔵 Team descriptions All mandatory under EU law. Under the new SEC framework, that same information is precisely what can turn a non-security into an investment contract. Reverse solicitation does not fix this. One document cannot satisfy both regimes. We mapped out where the systems align, where they collide, and what European and Swiss issuers should do now. Link in the comments. How are you navigating the tension between MiCA disclosure obligations and US securities law? Share your thoughts in the comments. #Crypto #MiCA #SEC #TokenizedSecurities #CryptoRegulation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Stablecoins are no longer just a product. They’re becoming global financial infrastructure. But the real bottleneck isn’t technology. It’s licensing. #Stablecoins #Fintech #CryptoInfrastructure #Payments #GlobalPayments #FinancialInfrastructure
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The UK's #FinancialConductAuthority has selected 4 firms—Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, Revolut, and VVTX—to test #stablecoin services in its #RegulatorySandbox, with Q1 2026 testing aimed at shaping final UK stablecoin regulations. This pro-innovation pilot allows real-world trials of payment, settlement, and trading use cases ahead of the full crypto regime launch in October 2027. #fca #stablecoins #cryptoregulation #ukfintech #regulatorysandbox #digitalassets #payments #financialinnovation #compliance #revolut #crypto #swapED #fintech #aml #regulatorytech https://lnkd.in/eWT269Zj
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"The Regulatory Sandbox programme allows firms to trial stablecoin products in real world conditions with appropriate safeguards. It will help the FCA assess its proposed policy in a live environment and ensure future rules are clear, effective and support responsible innovation. The FCA’s testing will primarily focus on stablecoin issuance. The 4 selected firms’ proposals represent a range of stablecoin use cases, including payments, wholesale settlement and crypto trading. Each firm will receive feedback from FCA specialists while helping to shape the UK’s regulatory approach." Financial Conduct Authority #sandbox #uk #stablecoins #crypto #cryptoassets #cryptoregulation #digitalassets https://lnkd.in/eK8vhiPW
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most founders don’t fail in crypto because of bad ideas. They fail because they choose the wrong jurisdiction. DIFC isn’t the easiest place to set up a crypto company. And that’s exactly why it works. It’s regulated. Structured. Respected. Backed by the DFSA framework, it gives your business something most jurisdictions can’t—credibility that banks and investors actually trust. But here’s the reality most people won’t tell you: Approval isn’t just about registering a company. It’s about proving you belong in a regulated financial system. That means: Strong compliance. Clear business model. Precise execution. Get it right—and you build a business that scales globally. Get it wrong—and you don’t get in. At Vorx Consultancy, we don’t just help you “set up.” We help you structure your business to withstand regulation, secure banking, and scale with confidence. If you’re serious about building in DIFC, don’t guess. Plan. www.vorxcon.com support@vorxcon.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-