Australia is edging closer and closer to introducing its first regulation for the digital assets industry, with the draft legislation now sitting with the Senate. Using the AFSL framework as the core platform to regulate the industry is a positive step in the right direction as it’s a trusted, well understand and common form of regulation for the broader financial services sector. Despite this, the Federal Government can further promote the growth of the stablecoin industry, by progressing bespoke licencing framework, similar to other jurisdictiona like the United States. AUDD - Australian Digital Dollar will continue to work with regulators on this in the months ahead, as the stablecoin industry increases its role as an integral part of banking, payments and the future global economy. Read my comments in Capital Brief below for all the details. https://lnkd.in/gvr8rSvq
Australia's Digital Assets Regulation Edges Closer to Reality
More Relevant Posts
-
I recently spoke with Capital Brief about the importance of clear regulation for the future of digital assets in Australia. The proposed crypto exchange licensing regime currently before Parliament is an important step forward. Greater regulatory clarity will help businesses like CloudTech Group operate with confidence and build stronger connections with the traditional financial system. However, the success of stablecoins in Australia will ultimately depend on how effectively they integrate with the broader banking ecosystem. As I shared in the article: “If the crypto world cannot have the very smooth transaction or migration with the major banks, the Aussie dollar won’t play a very big role in the whole market if the stablecoin won’t be backed by the Australian dollar or won’t be implemented by the major banks.” Ensuring Australian-dollar backed stablecoins can operate seamlessly alongside existing financial infrastructure will be critical if Australia wants to remain part of the future global financial ecosystem. Read the article here: https://lnkd.in/g7TsqG5H
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Russia plans simplified crypto licensing for banks & brokers. 🏦 💱 Institutions could run exchanges under existing permits with a 1% capital limit. Broader crypto laws by July 2026 aim to regulate digital assets while limiting retail exposure. #Russia https://lnkd.in/dZGK9sRw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Clear regulation will play a key role in shaping the future of Australia’s digital asset ecosystem. In Capital Brief, CloudTech Group CFO and Executive Director Mandy Jiang discusses how the proposed crypto exchange licensing regime currently before Parliament could provide greater certainty for businesses operating in the sector. However, ensuring Australian-dollar backed stablecoins can integrate smoothly with the banking system will be critical to their long-term adoption. As Mandy noted: “𝙄𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙨𝙢𝙤𝙤𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙨𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙧 𝙢𝙞𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙟𝙤𝙧 𝙗𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙚 𝙙𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙬𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮 𝙖 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙗𝙞𝙜 𝙧𝙤𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙚𝙩 𝙞𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙞𝙣 𝙬𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙗𝙚 𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙣 𝙙𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙧 𝙤𝙧 𝙬𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙗𝙚 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙟𝙤𝙧 𝙗𝙖𝙣𝙠𝙨.” We believe collaboration between industry, regulators and financial institutions will be essential to ensure Australia remains competitive in the evolving digital asset landscape. Read the article here: https://lnkd.in/gYh5ytDg
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In this week’s Giltspur Insights, we examine the progression of the United Kingdom’s digital asset framework from perimeter definition to operational implementation. HM Treasury’s Payments Forward Plan outlines the sequencing of stablecoin regulation and the continued development of the Digital Pound within mainstream payments law. The Financial Conduct Authority has confirmed the authorisation window for newly regulated cryptoasset activities (30 September 2026 – 28 February 2027) and has launched its inaugural stablecoin sandbox cohort. Digital assets are now formally recognised as personal property under English law, strengthening the statutory foundation for custody and asset recovery. Finally, CARF data collection requirements are now active for UK providers, reinforcing the integration of digital assets within established tax and reporting frameworks. Beyond the UK perimeter, institutional infrastructure continues to mature. Securitize has filed for a Nasdaq listing, while the Canton Network has completed further cross-border collateral mobility trials. The direction is clear: digital asset activity is increasingly embedded within conventional regulatory and capital markets structures. Full briefing: https://lnkd.in/dU73v8Ft #digitalassets #rwa #tokenisation #cryptoregulation #crypto #web3
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Crypto‑Asset and Stablecoin Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of MiCAR, the United States GENIUS Act, and the UK Regulatory Framework by Filippo Annunziata provides a detailed comparative analysis of the emerging regulatory regimes for stablecoins across the EU, the US, and the UK. While all three jurisdictions recognize that stablecoins perform money‑like functions requiring prudential oversight, they diverge sharply in regulatory strategy. MiCAR introduces a comprehensive, market‑wide framework governing a broad spectrum of crypto‑asset activities. The US GENIUS Act focuses primarily on prudential supervision of payment stablecoin issuers. The UK framework, evolving under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023, seeks to integrate crypto‑asset activities into its existing financial regulatory architecture. The paper argues that these differences reflect deeper institutional choices about the governance of private digital money and the evolving relationship between stablecoins, tokenised deposits, and public monetary systems. Read: http://spkl.io/6041A0fDW #Crypto #Stablecoins #DigitalAssets #FinReg #MiCAR #GeniusAct #CBDC #FinancialRegulation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Canada just revoked 47 crypto-related licenses. That’s not a crackdown on crypto. It’s a crackdown on access points. • 50 MSBs revoked YTD • 47 tied to crypto • Enforcement accelerating • Previous fines: $126M + $14M This isn’t random. It’s structural. Governments aren’t targeting blockchains. They’re targeting: • fiat on/off-ramps • intermediaries • compliance gaps Because that’s where control exists. And where risk enters the system. The deeper signal: Regulation isn’t shrinking the market. It’s reshaping it Weak, non-compliant players get removed. Compliant infrastructure gains share. Liquidity doesn’t disappear. It consolidates. And that matters. Because institutional capital doesn’t flow into chaos. It flows into: • regulated rails • trusted counterparties • compliant systems That’s where the next phase builds. Not in the absence of regulation. But through it. #Crypto #Regulation #Compliance #MarketStructure #Liquidity #AML #Fintech #Web3Rock
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The OCC issued a proposal outlining how institutions under its supervision could issue and manage stablecoins under the GENIUS Act. The proposal introduces several notable requirements... Stablecoin issuers would be prohibited from paying interest or yield to holders. Newly established institutions could face a $5M minimum capital requirement and would need to hold 12 months of operating expenses in liquid assets. The rule also outlines reserve standards and opens the door for foreign issuers to register with the OCC if they operate under comparable regulatory regimes. For founders building in crypto and payments, this is another sign that stablecoins are moving deeper into the regulated financial system...
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝐂𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐦 𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐒𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐬 Recent headlines suggest Canadian regulators are revoking crypto firm registrations. It sounds like enforcement, but it is better understood as a shift in expectations. This is not isolated. The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) has recently revoked 50 MSB registrations, with 47 tied to crypto businesses. This is part of a broader supervisory push, not a one-off action. At the same time, Canada is moving firms into full oversight under the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) and the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO). The focus is no longer on whether firms intend to comply, but whether they can operate in a compliant way on an ongoing basis. What you should focus on is why these firms are falling out of the market. In many cases, it is not sophisticated financial crime. It is a breakdown in the fundamental regulatory requirements. Firms not responding to regulators, gaps in record keeping, and an inability to meet ongoing compliance obligations. These are baseline expectations and shouldn't come as a surprise to these MSBs or you. This points to a broader issue. Many firms have focused on getting registered and have followed the checklist style of compliance obligations, but far fewer have built the fit-for-use operational capabilities to stay compliant. There is a difference between designing a compliance program and running one at scale. Regulators are also changing how they supervise. Enforcement is becoming more proactive, more coordinated, and more systemic. The expectation is now aligned with traditional financial institutions, where compliance is embedded into day-to-day operations and subject to continuous oversight. The result is a quiet reset and we see this by the number of exiting. Others cannot meet the standard and will have to make changes to their operating mode. Over time, this will likely lead to a smaller group of firms that have the infrastructure and governance to operate under sustained regulatory pressure. The question is no longer whether regulation will catch up to crypto. It already has. The real question is whether crypto firms can operationalize compliance fast enough to keep up. #Compliance #Crypto #AML #CTF #Fintech #Regulation #RiskManagement #Governance #DigitalAssets #Canada #FINTRAC
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝗗𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗔𝗰𝘁 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗦𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗖𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗨.𝗦. 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀, 𝗚𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗼 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝗻𝘀 Former chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Chris Giancarlo, has warned that delays in passing the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act could hinder innovation in the American banking sector and leave the country behind global competitors. Giancarlo said traditional financial institutions require clear regulatory frameworks before committing capital to digital-asset infrastructure. According to him, banks face stricter legal and compliance requirements than crypto startups, making regulatory certainty essential for large-scale investment in blockchain-based financial systems. The CLARITY Act, designed to establish a comprehensive regulatory structure for digital assets in the United States, passed the House of Representatives in 2025 but has stalled in the Senate amid disagreements over key provisions, including rules surrounding stablecoins and yield-bearing products. Giancarlo noted that legal teams at major banks are advising corporate boards against investing billions of dollars into crypto-related infrastructure without clear legal guidance. As a result, many institutions remain cautious about expanding into digital assets.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Kazakhstan Moves Toward Widespread Crypto Payments Under DFA Regulation Regulators in Kazakhstan propose licensing for crypto exchanges, tokenized assets, and crypto-fiat cards as digital assets broaden the financial landscape....
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore related topics
- Stablecoin Innovations and Regulatory Challenges
- The Future of Stablecoin Adoption
- How Stablecoins Affect Financial Markets
- How Stablecoins Are Transforming Payments
- Stablecoins for Business Transactions
- Stablecoin Market Size and Adoption
- Factors Driving Stablecoin Market Growth
- Cryptocurrency Regulations in Banking
- Understanding Stablecoins in Traditional Finance
- Digital Asset Regulatory Changes
Thanks Effie Dimitropoulos - asking for a friend (New Zealand ie the country), what does a stablecoin issuer licence give you that a stored value/payments licence doesn’t?