Thomas R.

Foundry turns ten this year. Ten years is a useful interval. Long enough to have built something meaningful. Long enough for what you do to quietly evolve past what your brand says you do. When I started Foundry in 2015, the studio was a graphic design business. Visual identity, print and digital work. The brand reflected exactly what the studio was at the time. And while we are still a design studio, ten years on, the work is more considered and the process is very different. Most engagements now begin with positioning, before any visual work happens. Often, the deliverables sit closer to brand consultancy than traditional design studio output. The work is no longer just visual. It is about clarity, positioning and growth as much as identity. The studio kept moving. The brand stayed where it started. A few things I am noticing as I rebuild it from the inside: Ten years of muscle memory is hard to write your way past. Every sentence about Foundry comes out pre-loaded with the old vocabulary. The new framing has to be excavated in real time. The small surfaces matter more than the big ones. The positioning lines and descriptors. The way you answer "so, what do you do?" at dinner. None of these are just creative decisions. They are positioning decisions, and ours had been stuck on autopilot for a decade. Ten years has served as an inflection point to consider what Foundry is now, and what we want it to become over the coming years. There is no crisis here. By any reasonable measure, the studio is fine. Which is precisely the trap. Fine is the category that hides the work that needs doing. I will be writing about the rebuild as I go. If you have built something over a decade and the brand has not quite kept up, you are not alone. It is the most common diagnosis I make.

10

I wrote a new post: On the Inevitability of Design Changing Forever. In it, I present three different but interoperative scenarios for the future of graphic design. As always, curious to hear your thoughts. https://lnkd.in/ebnVpwMU

10

4 Comments

@Kung Pik Liu I agree, and here are my thoughts. Design isn’t just about what you see, it’s about why you see it. When I’m tackling a design problem, I focus on building scalable systems that work across every touchpoint and making intentional choices that align visuals with the brand’s voice and business goals. True design thinking lives in the strategy, not just the software. Production skills and software proficiency can be taught. But the ability to think critically, connect brand objectives with visual execution, and collaborate strategically comes from experience. That’s what turns a “nice-looking design” into an identity that’s memorable, recognizable, and built to last. My background in design education has strengthened my ability to clearly explain the reasoning behind creative decisions, helping teams and stakeholders understand not just what works, but why it works. I apply that approach to every project, breaking down the thinking behind color, type, hierarchy, and spacing so the work is not only visually appealing but purposeful. Whether the project is a logo, a packaging refresh, or a full campaign rollout, my goal is always the same: create design solutions that connect, convert, and scale seamlessly. 🔗 bradlovesorange.com #BrandKisner #DesignThinking #ScalableDesignSystems #StrategicCollaboration #CreativeDirection #LogoDesign #PackagingDesign #CampaignDesign #TheNisSilent

4

In creative problem solving, there are 6 types of limitations that a designer must consider: Time Money Material Skillset Motivation Experience   Each one changes the outcome of the design, i.e. how successful it is or isn't.   -- What this looks like for me, when I begin to define a project/problem for my clients:   "Is there an anniversary date, grant application deadline, or other meaningful date you're hoping to align this project with?" "Do you have an overall budget for this? Will this budget be split across workmanship and advertising/production costs?" "Is brand photography or videography important to your brand's audience? And, if yes, do you have high quality photos/videos that were produced in the last 2 years?" "What made you want to do all of this now? What's the real reason you want to focus on brand?"   -- Ready to talk limitations/possibilities? Book a 15m phone call with me @ www.SayWhen.Studio/yap

18

I'm reposting a profile by Julie Anixter. As you will note she is doing a series on "Role Models." Subjects will run from A to Z and it promises to be really good. Eventually it will be a book but for now you can follow its evolution here on Substack. My thanks to Julie, and I hope you enjoy!

57

4 Comments

No one asked me to get better at illustrating custom typography.✏️ I had to pursue it. I had to intentionally explore what worked, what didn’t, and where my letterforms fell short. It took practice. It took self-initiated projects. It took small experiments that pushed my typography further into storytelling. The truth about mastering a technique? It’s the answer no one wants to hear... Start...Do the reps...Finish the small projects! Some of my biggest growth came from 1–2 day personal projects focused on one thing: improving my letterforms. Exploring ideas that felt fun. Following curiosity. Building momentum. And most importantly — finishing. I’m by no means a master of everything, but I’m a lifelong student in pursuit of mastery. Here’s how I measure success: I can see the progress. And progress is what keeps me motivated — and hungry for what’s next. How are you intentionally progressing your skills? #Typography #Illustration #GraphicDesign #CreativeProcess #vectorart

2,754

69 Comments

Remember when desktop publishing arrived and suddenly everyone was a designer?  No? Exactly. PageMaker. QuarkXPress. InDesign. Canva. Every generation of design tools was supposed to replace us. It never did. It raised the floor and made the ceiling higher. DTP didn't kill design — it got rid of the mechanical stuff and freed the people with actual ideas to do more with them. (And if you remember the secret alien hidden inside QuarkXPress — Cmd + Shift + Option + K on a Mac, Shift + Ctrl + Alt + K on a PC — you know exactly what era I'm talking about. And you're probably very good at your job. Link in the comments.) AI has no taste of its own. No point of view it was born with. No curiosity that wakes it up at 4am. It borrows yours. My ideas, my drawing, my early morning writing or motorway diffuse thinking — is mine. AI doesn't get a look in. Anthropic, one of the world's leading AI companies, recently advertised a Presentation Design Lead at $385,000 a year and an Events Lead at $400,000. The company building the most advanced AI available is investing heavily in human creative expertise. That's not a coincidence. That's a signal. Creative thinkers aren't becoming redundant. We're becoming premium. Which is why I'm really expensive. 😉

13

3 Comments

Want to remove subjectivity from your design crit? When you’re going back and forth based on taste, try shifting the question from: “Does it look good?” ➡️ ”Does it fit the brief?” Walk through the goal, the “why” behind the project’s existence. If you’re not aligned there, that’s the first thing to resolve before picking between rounded or sharp corners. Best of luck! And remember, two people can be right (or wrong) at the same time. 👯

21

3 Comments

I’ve been noticing more retro design showing up in branding. Vintage type. Muted palettes. Logos that feel pulled from another era. It is not random. Nostalgia builds trust because it feels familiar. Familiar visuals lower resistance. They remind you of something steady. Consumer psychology shows that nostalgic cues increase feelings of connection and make people more open to engaging with a brand. I have always loved mid century modern design in home decor and architecture. Clean lines. Warm woods. Functional beauty. When I see those influences show up in branding out in the world, it immediately catches my eye. It is not about recreating the past. It is about designing for emotion. If you want your brand to feel trusted faster, look at what memories your visuals are tapping into.

15

5 Comments

One of my favorite parts of design work is figuring out what clients actually mean when they describe something. They’ll say things like “This section feels heavy” or “Can we make this a little happier” or “It needs more energy.” None of those are technical terms, but they always point to something real. “Feels heavy” is usually spacing or hierarchy. “Happier” is often color or tone. “More energy” might mean contrast, pacing, or flow. Just like their customers, clients aren't dissecting the specifics, but they know exactly how something should feel.

65

13 Comments

Most brands lead with what they do. The best ones lead with how they make you feel. We recently worked with a client who had pages of features and product specs, but none of it captured the actual impact they were making. So we flipped the script. Instead of talking about functionality, we reframed the story around human outcomes. Meaning, what life looks and feels like when the product works. How their customers' lives improve. That simple shift wasn’t cosmetic. It unlocked new messaging pillars, sparked fresh campaign ideas,and gave the internal team a shot of energy. And internal alignment leads to better outcomes overall. Because at the end of the day, people don’t buy features. They buy change. #BrandStrategy #MarketingStrategy #Messaging #CreativeStrategy #Storytelling #CustomerExperience #BrandBuilding #GoToMarket #BusinessGrowth #DesignThinking

9

You hired experience. Let it do its job. One of the more interesting dynamics in design: A client hires you because you’ve done this for decades… then proceeds to override the very thinking they brought you in for. At that point, the work usually shifts from strategic to safe. And safe rarely moves anything forward. Good design isn’t just about making things look right. It’s about making the right decisions—often the harder ones. The strongest partnerships? They’re built on trust, not second-guessing. #BrandStrategy #CreativeDirection #DesignStrategy #DesignProcess #ClientPartnership #TrustTheProcess #CreativeThinking #WeAreInThisTogether

8

📸 Why the Best Photographers Hire Photo Retouchers (Spoiler: It’s not weakness. It’s strategy.) Let’s be honest: 📷 A photographer’s job is to capture light, emotion, and story — not spend 6 hours removing dust spots from a wedding album. 🖌️ A retoucher’s job? To perfect tone, texture, and consistency — so your work looks exactly how you envisioned it. One creates the image. The other makes it shine. And no — you don’t have to do both to be “legit.” 🚫 Just because you can retouch your own photos… doesn’t mean you should. Would a director edit their own film? A designer code their own website? A musician master their own album? Sometimes. But the best ones collaborate with specialists who elevate their craft. Same goes for photography. ✅ The Breakdown: Lights. Shoots. Directs.Polishes. Fixes. Refines.Owns vision & momentOwns color, skin, consistencyWorks fast under pressureWorks precise, at scale 👉 This isn’t about skill. It’s about focus. Every hour you spend in Photoshop is an hour you’re not shooting, pitching, or growing your brand. 💡 The Real Win? Deliver faster turnarounds Maintain higher quality Scale without burnout Charge premium rates (because your portfolio looks flawless) Clients don’t care if you did the retouching. They care that it looks incredible. 🤝 Let’s Normalize This: Hiring a retoucher isn’t “giving up control.” It’s building a creative team — like any pro would. Like a filmmaker + editor. A designer + developer. A band + sound engineer. Great work is rarely solo. It’s trusted collaboration. 👇 Let’s Talk: 🔹 Photographers: What’s the #1 thing you wish you didn’t have to edit yourself? 🔹 Retouchers: What drives you crazy in raw files? (Flyaways? Mixed white balance?) 🔁 Tag a photographer who needs a retoucher — or a retoucher who deserves credit. 💬 Drop your specialty below: Beauty? Fashion? E-commerce? Real estate? Let’s give post-production the respect it deserves. — #Photographer #PhotoRetoucher #CreativeCollaboration #Retouching #PortraitPhotography #FashionPhotography #ContentCreation #FreelancePhotographer #BehindTheScenes #PhotoEditing #ShootMoreEditLess #CreativeSpecialization #DigitalWorkflow #VisualStorytelling #OutsourceCreativeWork #HighEndRetouching #ColorGrading #FreelanceLife #TeamOverSolo #CreativePartnerships

2

1 Comment

TYPE TREND 2026 #3: HERO CHARACTERS The Hero Characters trend highlights the beauty of single letters in large-scale font styles, transforming how we experience typography. Designers are elevating individual letters, treating them as heroic elements that dominate layouts and become sculptural objects. Hero characters are particularly effective for identity systems, packaging, signage, editorial design, and motion graphics.

4

Vector work isn’t about converting files. It’s about preventing problems before they happen. Bad vectors don’t show issues on screen. They show them in print. On banners. On large formats. That’s where brands lose money. Clean vectors mean consistent shapes, accurate proportions, and zero surprises in production. That’s why I focus less on speed and more on correctness. Because fixing mistakes later always costs more than doing it right once.

10

Does Culture Shape Design — or Are We All Designing the Same Thing Now? Design doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Or does it? A designer working in the San Francisco Bay Area is surrounded by tech culture, venture capital optimism, product thinking, and a constant push toward “clean,” “scalable,” and “disruptive.” Compare that to someone designing in Bozeman, Montana—where pace, community, and proximity to nature might influence a more tactile, grounded, or regional sensibility. The question is: does location still meaningfully shape design outcomes, or has the internet flattened those differences? On a global level, the contrast seems even sharper. German design is often associated with precision, systems thinking, and restraint. Japanese design frequently embraces asymmetry, negative space, and a deep respect for craft and imperfection. These aren’t just aesthetic choices—they’re reflections of broader cultural values. But in an era where designers everywhere share the same tools, trends, and references, how much of that cultural DNA actually survives? Then there’s time. Does where you were trained matter after ten years in the industry? Or does professional experience eventually override geography and education? Many designers start with a strong regional or academic influence, only to find that client work, deadlines, and commercial constraints slowly sand those edges down. Which brings us to brand guidelines. Working within established systems can sharpen problem-solving skills, but it can also narrow creative range. After years of designing inside strict brand frameworks, do designers lose some of their experimental instincts—or do they simply learn how to be creative within tighter boundaries? And what about inspiration itself? Mood boards built from Pinterest, Instagram, and trend reports often pull from the same visual pool. When everyone references the same sources, designs begin to converge. Is this any different from the way global brands like McDonald’s appear in every country—slightly localized, but fundamentally the same? Are we witnessing the homogenization of design, where regional flavor is replaced by a globally acceptable, algorithm-approved aesthetic? Maybe culture still affects design—but more quietly now. Or maybe designers affect culture less than we’d like to believe. The real question might not be whether culture shapes design, but how much friction a designer is willing to preserve against sameness. #design #graphicdesign #branding #freelancedesigner

4

1 Comment

"If you want to break the rules of typography, you must know them first." I read that during my first typography class and it stayed with me. It positions typography as something structured before it becomes expressive. Rules can be broken, but never ignored. Type selection is not only a decorative choice. It is a structural decision that shapes how a brand is perceived. Understanding the rules gives you control. Breaking them with intention shows character. Link to full read in comments.

36

13 Comments

One of the most critical roles in packaging production is invisible when done right. And highly visible when missed. In a recent packaging workflow, an artwork file had already been approved across design, marketing, and client stakeholders. From a visual standpoint—everything was aligned. However, during final repro governance, a deeper technical check revealed: 👉 The color separation strategy was not optimized for the selected print process. Under press conditions, this would have resulted in: • Noticeable color deviation across batches • Inconsistent brand representation across markets • Potential rejection at quality control stages In regulated and high-volume environments, such inconsistencies are not minor issues— They directly impact: • Brand equity • Market trust • Production cost This is why production governance must go beyond visual approval. It requires: • Technical validation • Process alignment • Risk anticipation After 26 years in this field, one principle remains constant: The cost of prevention is always lower than the cost of correction. #BrandIntegrity #PackagingProduction #Repro #QualityGovernance #PrintQuality #GlobalPackaging

5

2 Comments