Still sending the same cover letter to every job? In our new guide, we show how to write a 250–400 word letter that sounds human, matches the job description, and explains your story without repeating your resume. Article below 👇
FoundRole
Technology, Information and Internet
Chicago, Illinois 17 followers
Find roles, track applications, and search with AI. All in one place.
About us
Most job seekers are managing their search across 10+ browser tabs, random spreadsheets, and job boards that all feel the same. FoundRole brings everything into one place: 🔍 Job Search – quality-checked listings across 40+ industries, regularly updated. Filter by salary, location, remote, and job type. 📋 Job Tracker – a Kanban board to manage every application from saved to offer. No spreadsheets. No missed follow-ups. Full pipeline visibility. 🤖 AI Job Search via MCP – search jobs using natural language inside Claude, Cursor, or Perplexity. Your AI assistant now finds jobs too. We also publish practical career content on interviews, salary negotiation, resume strategy, and hiring trends, written for people actively in the job market. If you're serious about your next move, start here. Free → foundrole.com
- Website
-
https://www.foundrole.com
External link for FoundRole
- Industry
- Technology, Information and Internet
- Company size
- 2-10 employees
- Headquarters
- Chicago, Illinois
- Type
- Privately Held
- Founded
- 2025
- Specialties
- Job Search, Job Board, Job Tracker, Career Tools, AI Job Matching, Career Development, Job Alerts, Remote Jobs, US Job Market, Tech Jobs, Career Advice, Interview Prep, Salary Insights, HR Tech, Recruitment Technology, Job Seekers, Career Platform, Job Listings, and Career Management
Locations
-
Primary
Get directions
Chicago, Illinois, US
Updates
-
Most people still think AI at work is just for writing emails or fixing code. They’re wrong. Look at this new data on how people actually use Copilot day-to-day. Almost half the time (49%), it’s used for analysis, reasoning, and decision-making. Only 17% goes into actually producing work like docs or writing. If you are job hunting right now, this matters. A lot. Most candidates go into interviews saying, "I use AI to write faster." But that's just the baseline now. It doesn't make you stand out. Companies don't want a faster typist. They want someone who uses AI to think faster. To validate ideas. To solve messy, complex problems. Next time you update your resume or do an interview, don't focus on the 17%. Focus on the 49%. Show them how you use tools to make better decisions. How do you mostly use it? Writing or thinking? Full breakdown in the image below. The source link is in the comments 👇
-
-
Asking for a referral feels like asking for a favor. It doesn't have to. Most referral asks fail for the same three reasons: they're vague (Can you put in a good word?), they're transactional (the contact gets nothing out of it), and they leave the other person no comfortable way to say no. The fix isn't better phrasing. It's a different framing entirely. Ask for their opinion, not a favor. Anchor on something specific, a named role, a shared history, something that happened recently. And build in a clean, easy out, so 'not right now' doesn't feel awkward for either of you. When you do those three things, the message reads like a genuine conversation opener. Not a job-search plea. The ask that works doesn't feel like an ask. 5 copy-paste scripts inside - one per scenario, from warm contact to cold reconnect. Each one is ready to adapt in under two minutes. Which referral ask has actually worked for you? What did you say? #Networking #CareerStrategy #JobSearch
-
Four rounds. Six weeks. No offer letter, no rejection. Just silence. This happens more than most candidates expect. The process went well, or seemed to. Strong feedback after round three. A final panel that felt like a formality. A recruiter said, "We'll be in touch by end of week." Then nothing. That silence has a simple explanation: something changed on their end. A budget freeze. An internal candidate who surfaced late. A restructured headcount. A hiring manager who left the company. None of those outcomes resolves with a follow-up email. You didn't do anything wrong. The variable that mattered wasn't you. The practical rule for managing a stall: Follow up once at the two-week mark after a final round. One direct note, no apology, no pressure. If three weeks pass with no response: disengage. Don't formally withdraw. Just stop holding the role in your mental pipeline and keep applying at full intensity. When a company wants to hire you, next steps come fast. Urgency is the signal. Waiting past three weeks for closure that isn't coming costs you more than the role was worth. The companies that want you don't leave you guessing. What's the longest you've waited after a final round, and how did it end? #JobSearch #InterviewPrep #CareerGrowth
-
-
When people use AI to look for talent, they’re not just reading your resume or LinkedIn headline, they’re reading everything AI can find about you: posts, interviews, mentions, reviews. In 2026, your “AI resume” is the sum of all those signals, which means serious candidates and leaders need to think beyond one profile and start being intentional about where and how they show up online.
Up to ~80% of AI search visibility comes from sources NOT owned by you. Your content only accounts for ~17%... This should prompt any marketing team to rethink their content strategy. If you're keen to learn more about the topic, join our free upcoming masterclass here: https://lnkd.in/gpHYUFiB How Brands Get Recommended By LLMs on May 29th at 4pm BST. Tweaking content, fixing schema, and improving page speed matters. But you might need to rethink how much time you're devoting to it. AI platforms aren't just reading YOUR website. They're trained on the entire internet. So they're looking at Reddit threads, G2 reviews, industry roundups, Quora answers, Forbes mentions, and third-party publications in your category. No amount of on-site optimisation will close that gap if you're not mentioned. Or worse, if they're talking about your competitors instead. Getting mentioned in the right roundups is very overlooked right now. But it doesn't have to stay that way. Here's where you can make a difference: ✅ Get featured in the right publications. ✅ Show up in the conversations happening across the forums. ✅ Review platforms that AI models trust the most. ✅ Post high-value LinkedIn content in your niche. That last one is arguably the most important. LinkedIn is the 2nd most cited domain by AI right now. With Searchable, you can actually use the content creator to create articles, That will get featured in any external publications. Meaning you can optimise on and off-site. We've also created a free tool to help you get started. It's an incredible AI Search Visibility Report. It will tell you where you actually show up across the top AI platforms. And identify the third-party sources citing your competitors. Because Searchable isn't just an analytics tool. It's an agentic co-pilot trained on your brand, business, and industry. It knows what you do, who you serve, And what you need to say to earn those citations. It is the only tool that will close those gaps automatically. Find out exactly where you stand right now: https://lnkd.in/gQTVD-CW And join our free masterclass this Friday to discover exactly how you can get your brand cited by AI: https://lnkd.in/gpHYUFiB Save this post to come back to it. And comment below with your questions/concerns about AI search. ♻️ Repost to help your network get the full picture of AI visibility. And follow Chris Donnelly for more on AI search and building with AI.
-
-
The latest JOLTS report calls the U.S. labor market "stable." Challenger's April data says 26% of that month's layoffs were attributed to AI. Here's what the macro picture actually shows: - Job openings flat at 6.9M in March - Hires up to 5.6M (highest since February 2024) - Total separations at 5.4M - Layoff rate still around 1.2% On paper, that's a calm, low-hire / low-fire environment. But zoom in on who is being cut and why, and the story shifts. Challenger's April report counted 83,387 announced layoffs, up 38% vs. March. Of those, 21,490 roles, 26% of the total, were explicitly attributed to AI. That's the second consecutive month AI has been the top stated reason for cuts. Year-to-date, employers have tied about 49,135 planned cuts to AI initiatives, roughly 16% of all layoffs announced in 2026 so far. Up from 13% through March. The macro stats signal no crisis. The pain is concentrated in specific sectors and roles, not spread evenly across the economy. If you're in white-collar, tech, product, operations, or support, the takeaway isn't panic. It's to assume a world where headcount stays flat, output expectations rise, and AI is the official lever companies use to justify restructuring. The market doesn't reward staying. It rewards being harder to replace than to automate. What makes your role harder to replace than to automate or redistribute under an AI-driven org chart? #FutureOfWork #JobSearch #CareerAdvice
-
-
80 applications in 6 weeks. Two form rejections. The rest: silence. Most new grads call this bad luck. It's a strategy problem. The mistake: treating cold applying like a volume game. Same resume, same cover letter, pasted into every portal that surfaces. More applications, better odds, that's the assumption. It's wrong. Recruiters can tell in 10 seconds whether you read the job description or ran a search-and-paste. Generic applications don't get callbacks. They confirm you don't know what you want. The fix is a smaller list, not a longer one. Pick 12-20 companies you'd actually say yes to on a Monday morning. Not brand names. Companies where the work matches something you've done or studied. Then, for each application, write one line that shows 10 minutes of homework. Not this: "I'm a motivated recent graduate who would love to contribute to your team." This: "I'm applying because your team just shipped [X] and I spent last semester doing [Y]." That one sentence separates your application from 90% of the stack. Fewer applications. More homework. That's the fix. What was the first cold application you sent that actually got a response, and what made it different? #JobSearch #EarlyCareer #NewGrad
-
-
Posting on LinkedIn isn’t just about reach anymore, it’s about becoming part of the “source layer” that AI pulls from when people ask questions about your industry, your role, or problems you can solve. If you care about being discoverable by future employers and future customers, treating LinkedIn as your primary content hub in 2026 is no longer optional, it’s strategic.
LinkedIn is the 2nd most cited domain by AI. Ahead of Wikipedia, YouTube, and every major news outlet... Every post you publish on LinkedIn is potential source material for AI. 11.12% of AI responses cite LinkedIn content. Even more reason to build your business around it this year. If you want to understand exactly which prompts are driving citations, And how to win them for your business... Join this free session tomorrow at 4pm BST: https://lnkd.in/gED4fSjE By the way, this has nothing to do with going "viral": The average cited post has just 15 to 25 reactions. For reference, however, this is specific to LinkedIn Pulse only (articles). Your job is to make sure your content is highly valuable, And AI crawlers should do the rest. Potential customers are searching for brands like yours through AI. And your LinkedIn content could potentially shape what they see. If your content is cited, your visibility will be untouchable. Here's what cited content looks like: ✅ Original ↳ The vast majority of what AI cites is written by the person posting it. ✅ Educational ↳ Content that answers a real question clearly and directly. ✅ Consistent ↳ Authors whose content gets cited show up regularly, not occasionally. ✅ Credible ↳ Real people with genuine expertise in a specific topic or field. A few things worth acting on immediately: 1. Use the exact language your customers search for in your taglines. ↳ This is where proper prompt research comes into play. 2. Build authority content around your core area of expertise. ↳ Consistently own a topic, and AI will associate you with it. 3. Write posts that answer specific questions directly. ↳ Actual answers to the problems your customers are trying to solve. The strategy for growing an audience hasn't changed: ➡️ Build a strong personal brand on LinkedIn. ➡️ Create content that genuinely helps people. ➡️ Answer the questions your customers are actually asking. It just turns out it's also the most effective way to show up in AI responses. Posting consistently on LinkedIn will give you a massive head start. But you have to know which prompts to target. If you're still struggling with this, We're breaking it down live tomorrow at 4pm BST. Which prompts actually drive revenue, how to find them, and how to build content around them. It's probably the most valuable hour you'll spend this week, and it's free. So make sure to register before it's too late: https://lnkd.in/gED4fSjE Save this post to come back to it later ! And drop a comment below with how your LinkedIn journey is going... ♻️ Repost to help your network understand what's changing in AI search. And follow Chris Donnelly for more on building visibility in the age of AI.
-