🚀 Not all GenAI tools are created equal — and that’s a good thing. If you’ve ever tried using the same generative AI tool for everything — from coding to content creation to data analysis — you’ve probably noticed: results vary. A lot. That’s because GenAI models have different strengths, training data, and reasoning patterns. Some excel at structured logic, others at storytelling or summarization. Thanks for sharing this nice example Charlie Hills! 👉 The takeaway? Experimentation pays off. The more you test across tools and contexts, the more you uncover where each shines. In 2025, the winners won’t be the ones who pick one AI tool — but the ones who build the right AI stack for each goal. #GenAI #ArtificialIntelligence #Productivity #Experimentation #AItools
Don't use ChatGPT or Gemini for image generation. They're actually the worst models to use. AI images are becoming indistinguishable. But, you still need to know which model to use. I tested 8 models with the same prompt: "Create an ultra-realistic portrait of a brand-new person: a mid-20s woman with cool olive skin, a jet-black chin-length bob with blunt bangs, and hazel eyes framed by soft winged liner and matte charcoal lipstick. She stands in a dim urban corridor with out-of-focus concrete pillars and faint graffiti, wearing a mustard-and-black striped halter top that catches subtle specular highlights. Use a soft key light from camera left and a faint rim from behind to reveal skin pores, tiny peach fuzz, and individual flyaway hairs, with believable subsurface scattering on cheeks and nose. Compose a chest-up shot at eye level, shallow depth of field, creamy bokeh, and natural color grading with gentle film grain. Captured on a Sony A7R IV with an 85mm f/1.8 lens at f/2, ISO 200, 1/200s. Deliver 8K photorealism with editorial-grade lighting, lifelike textures, and magazine-quality depth." The results (from worst to best): 𝟭. 𝗖𝗵𝗮���𝗚𝗣𝗧 → 7.5/10 Adequate but darker exposure reduces editorial impact. 𝟮. 𝗚𝗼𝗼𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶 → 7.7/10 Solid editorial quality with correct elements, slightly softer details. 𝟯. 𝗙𝗟𝗨𝗫.𝟭 𝗞𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 → 7.8/10 Excellent prompt adherence with strong technical execution and convincing textures. 𝟰. 𝗛𝗶𝗴𝗴𝘀𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱 → 7.9/10 Competent execution with harder lighting and an ambiguous garment pattern. 𝟱. 𝗜𝗱𝗲𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 → 8.2/10 Good quality but hair colour off and includes unspecified details. 𝟲. 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗳𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 → 8.3/10 Good colour palette and corridor atmosphere, but slightly less convincing skin texture. 𝟳. 𝗦𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝟰.𝟬 → 8.5/10 Clean, professional rendering with good depth and visible skin detail. 𝟴. 𝗠𝗶𝗱𝗷𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘆 → 8.8/10 Exceptional photorealism and micro-detail, minor deductions for off-prompt freckles and tight framing. The models everyone defaults to (ChatGPT, Gemini). They consistently underperform... Don't get me wrong. Gemini is top tier for editing images. But for one-shot image generations. Midjourney delivers magazine-quality results. Which model are you still using by default? Save this. Test the prompt yourself. Repost ♻️ for others. P.S. If you liked this, you’ll love charliehills.substack.com I break down real AI content workflows every Sunday.