Axiom’s cover photo
Axiom

Axiom

Technology, Information and Internet

The starting point for reasoning.

About us

Building quantitative super-intelligence. We are hiring: careers@axiommath.ai

Website
https://axiommath.ai
Industry
Technology, Information and Internet
Company size
11-50 employees
Type
Privately Held

Employees at Axiom

Updates

  • Axiom reposted this

    Google, DeepMind, OpenAI, and Meta all built formal math AI research programs. Each one stopped, pulled away by commercial pressure before the market for AI provers was ready. Axiom founder Carina Hong and Madrona Managing Director Matt McIlwain's read: they started too early. Axiom didn't. In the time since, Carina's team scored a perfect 120/120 on the Putnam exam, reached 98.93% on a software verification benchmark where the next-best models sit at 11%, and verified hardware circuits that standard formal checking tools could not. Watch the full conversation with Carina and Matt on Founded & Funded. YouTube: ordnl.link/wuXnt9L Spotify: ordnl.link/q7TR8bO Apple: ordnl.link/BHHiNnx Amazon: ordnl.link/y2XS2DL Madrona (Transcript): ordnl.link/oBbX6Wz

  • View organization page for Axiom

    10,720 followers

    Since February, 8 papers across algebraic geometry, representation theory, number theory, combinatorics have been quietly appearing on arXiv. Proofs by AxiomProver. 5 papers are now accepted at solid peer-reviewed math journals. To our knowledge, a first for the literature. Math journal review cycles can famously take years. Why so fast now? Every proof is generated in machine-verified Lean, then paired with a human exposition. The mathematician authors are there to explain the theorem, not to prove it. AxiomProver produces math one can trust. We sat down with Ina Fried of Axios on AxiomProver's first 100 days as an AI mathematician -- and discussed how our AI went from first-time competing at math Olympiads (Putnam) to publishing journal papers in under four months. https://lnkd.in/g7CRYnYV

  • Axiom reposted this

    Amherst College, Axiom, and Barnard College just utterly humiliated GPT-5.4 and Claude 4.6 by building a tiny 800K-parameter model that scores a perfect 100% where frontier giants score a flat 0%. Imagine a crystal growing perfectly along a rigid geometric grid rather than liquid splashing randomly. LDT achieves flawless deduction by treating reasoning as iterative refinement on an abstract lattice, locking logical steps into a mathematically sound structure. This recurrent transformer completely disrupts the AI arms race, proving that tiny, mathematically constrained architectures can absolutely destroy trillion-parameter giants at complex logic. https://lnkd.in/gYz5iRCn

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for Axiom

    10,720 followers

    For Carina Hong, excelling in math is training for any domain where reasoning involves structures — from optimizing with constraints to abstracting out of enumerations. In this podcast, she sits down with Matt McIlwain to discuss how a deep love of math becomes the strategic instinct behind Axiom’s wins.

    After 25 years in venture, the founders who stay with me longest are the ones whose love of their subject turns out to be their sharpest strategic insight. Carina Hong is that founder. Her thesis: math is the starting point of reasoning, and therefore the foundation of AGI. From that conviction she built a company that scored 120/120 on the Putnam exam, outperformed every major LLM on formal verification benchmarks, and is solving unsolved math problems autonomously. In our most recent episode of Founded & Funded, I sat down with Carina, founder of Axiom, and a few things that have stayed with me since we sat down are: 1) When she describes the relationship between math and code, it's not a product pitch. It's a mathematician describing something she finds genuinely beautiful. The commercial implication is almost a byproduct. 2) Google, DeepMind, OpenAI, and Meta all ran formal math research programs. Each deprioritized it when commercial pressure arrived. Carina's read: they started too early. She started at the right moment, when informal reasoning systems had advanced far enough that formal ones could benefit from them, and committed when everyone else was pivoting away. 3) When the field defaulted to unstructured math data, scraping textbooks and chain-of-thought labeling, she chose structured formal data. Less of it, but verified. Her argument: better sample efficiency, and scarcity puts you in contact with the hard problems faster. She was right. 4) She identified hardware verification as the first commercial market before it was obvious: cycles running 3–4x longer than design, 3–4x the headcount, and production-grade formal checking tools that can't scale without human intervention. When they tested Axiom Prover against real circuits, it verified things the standard tools could not. Carina's read on where this field is going has been more precise than the field itself. That's what I keep learning every time I talk with her. This episode is worth a listen.

  • Axiom reposted this

    After 25 years in venture, the founders who stay with me longest are the ones whose love of their subject turns out to be their sharpest strategic insight. Carina Hong is that founder. Her thesis: math is the starting point of reasoning, and therefore the foundation of AGI. From that conviction she built a company that scored 120/120 on the Putnam exam, outperformed every major LLM on formal verification benchmarks, and is solving unsolved math problems autonomously. In our most recent episode of Founded & Funded, I sat down with Carina, founder of Axiom, and a few things that have stayed with me since we sat down are: 1) When she describes the relationship between math and code, it's not a product pitch. It's a mathematician describing something she finds genuinely beautiful. The commercial implication is almost a byproduct. 2) Google, DeepMind, OpenAI, and Meta all ran formal math research programs. Each deprioritized it when commercial pressure arrived. Carina's read: they started too early. She started at the right moment, when informal reasoning systems had advanced far enough that formal ones could benefit from them, and committed when everyone else was pivoting away. 3) When the field defaulted to unstructured math data, scraping textbooks and chain-of-thought labeling, she chose structured formal data. Less of it, but verified. Her argument: better sample efficiency, and scarcity puts you in contact with the hard problems faster. She was right. 4) She identified hardware verification as the first commercial market before it was obvious: cycles running 3–4x longer than design, 3–4x the headcount, and production-grade formal checking tools that can't scale without human intervention. When they tested Axiom Prover against real circuits, it verified things the standard tools could not. Carina's read on where this field is going has been more precise than the field itself. That's what I keep learning every time I talk with her. This episode is worth a listen.

  • Axiom reposted this

    It was an honor to speak at the SAIR Science x AI Summit this morning alongside Leonardo de Moura, Prof Terrence Tao, Prof Tim Gowers, Prof Barry Barish, etc, at the warm invitation of Chuck Ng. My talk was on the Frontiers of AI for Mathematical Research, reporting on AxiomProver's 7 research papers in its first 100 days since February 2. (Tune in at 2h34m30s for my keynote speech.)

  • Axiom reposted this

    Today's AI+Science conference brought together leading minds to explore how AI is transforming scientific discovery across every discipline. Our afternoon sessions took us from AI in fundamental science to the role of human understanding in the future of scientific discovery. Darío Gil, the Under Secretary for Science at the U.S. Department of Energy, delivered our afternoon keynote, highlighting the vital connection between technological innovation and public policy in addressing our most pressing challenges. Leading scientists and researchers also explored how AI is revolutionizing our approach to the universe's deepest questions – from mathematics to physics to astrophysics. And lastly, our interdisciplinary panel tackled perhaps the most profound question of the day: What is the role of human understanding in this new era of AI-powered scientific discovery? The conversation affirmed that while AI is transforming how we conduct science, the human elements of curiosity, creativity, interpretation, and meaning-making remain at the heart of scientific endeavor. Thank you to everyone who joined us today! The formal program is done, but the conversation continues with John Hennessy, James Landay, and Fei-Fei Li in a fireside chat reflecting on today's exciting news and discussions on the future of AI in research. Read more about their perspectives and why Stanford is restructuring for AI’s next era: https://lnkd.in/gwPnrvwX

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for Axiom

    10,720 followers

    We work with mathematicians who send us real, cutting-edge research to digitalize: PDF in, Lean out. So we test AxiomProver by giving it exactly these frontier papers to autoformalize. Our second test case comes from plane curve singularities in algebraic geometry: is a specific quadratic form Q positive definite on its characteristic cone? Prof. Yifeng Huang answers the conjecture in the affirmative by linking the geometry of Quot schemes back to the dinv statistic from algebraic combinatorics. He defines a quadratic form Q on the gap poset of a numerical semigroup and, unexpectedly, recovers the Gorsky–Mazin dinv statistic for Dyck paths. A case-by-case analysis then shows that Q is positive semidefinite. Main engine autoformalized by AxiomProver. arXiv: https://lnkd.in/gNFRUwx2 Github: https://lnkd.in/gS3Ti988

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Axiom reposted this

    View organization page for Forbes

    18,111,348 followers

    The AI ecosystem is expanding faster than ever, and a new generation of startups is emerging to define its next phase. For the first time, Forbes is introducing the AI 50 Brink List, spotlighting 20 promising Seed and Series A companies building at the frontier of artificial intelligence. Despite being just 24 months old on average, these startups are already competing for elite talent, securing significant funding and tackling complex challenges across software, infrastructure and scientific discovery. While the AI 50 captures the industry’s current leaders, the Brink List offers a forward-looking view into the companies shaping its future. #ForbesAI50 https://lnkd.in/ef-BCzmv 📸: Nectar Social, Resolve AI, Periodic Labs, Ashley Maxwell, Giga, Jim Vetter, Studio B Portraits, Axiom

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Axiom reposted this

    Overheard at the Long Play: Jason Blum got roasted when Blumhouse teamed up with Meta to make AI shorts. Bryan Johnson says founders in monk mode may be overlooking what can help them perform at their best. Axiom is developing AI systems that solve complex math problems with reasoning. We’re unpacking all these and more as we highlight the major keys from last night’s Long Play event. AI isn’t just changing how things are made; it’s reshaping how people need to think, build, and operate. 📸: Tammy Horton for Nikki Ritcher | Nina Menconi for Nikki Ritcher

    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image
    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages

Funding

Axiom 1 total round

Last Round

Seed

US$ 64.0M

See more info on crunchbase