AI Costs®

I asked Gemini: “I want to use AI in legal costs drafting - what products are there?” AI Costs appeared in the answer. We have built the intelligence layer that costs drafting has been missing. If your team drafts bills, budgets, schedules or replies and wants to see how AI can help in a practical, controlled way, book a demo: https://lnkd.in/ee6DgSTS

There is a big difference between using AI casually and using AI properly. In costs work, that difference matters. A casual AI workflow says: “Upload the file and trust the answer.” A proper costs drafting workflow says: “Take one controlled piece of drafting at a time, process it safely, review it, amend it and approve it.” That is the model AI Costs is built around. The aim is not to remove professional judgement. The aim is to stop wasting professional judgement on repetitive wording tasks that software can support. The future of costs drafting is not unchecked automation. It is controlled augmentation. Human judgement on top. Intelligent drafting support underneath. Review at every stage. That is how legal AI should feel. If you want a short live walkthrough, send me a message. #LegalAI #CostsLaw #AICosts

Demo today. Quick Rewrite #1 in CostsMaster - “wow”. Quick Rewrite #2 in CostsMaster - “wow”. Quick Rewrite #3 in CostsMaster - “wow”. "You've done 8 rows there in seconds" Then: “This is amazing. I really see the value and what you have built.” That is the point of AI Costs. Not to replace the drafter. To give the drafter their time back. One long-term user put it perfectly: “It has freed up my time for actual decision making, rather than spending it typing.” That is what we are building - an intelligence layer for costs drafting. Book a demo and give your drafting team their time back.

The easiest way to understand AI Costs is this: It does not try to replace the costs draftsman. It changes the job from typing to reviewing. At the ACL conference in Manchester we heard how users no longer need to type. Instead of manually rewriting hundreds of rough entries, the draftsman can work through clean suggestions, approve what is right, amend what needs judgement, and keep moving. That sounds like a small change. It is not. Across a large bill, that repeated friction is where hours disappear: fixing wording; standardising descriptions; cleaning shorthand; keeping tone consistent; making the bill feel controlled. AI Costs was built for that exact point in the workflow. Not the glamorous bit. The repeated bit. The bit that quietly drains capacity every day. If your team is still manually grinding through descriptions, I would be happy to show you the alternative. #CostsDrafting #CostsLaw #AICosts

AI for costs is here. Not generic AI. Not a public chatbot. Not a black-box bill generator. A specialist drafting tool built around the way costs people actually work. AI Costs takes rough time entries and helps turn them into cleaner, more consistent, bill-ready wording - with the draftsman still reviewing, editing and approving the output. That distinction matters. Costs drafting is not just text production. It is judgement, recovery, proportionality, risk and presentation. The repetitive wording layer should not be taking up the best part of the day. The human should be applying judgement. The system should be carrying the repetitive load. That is the shift. AI Costs introduces intelligence into the drafting workflow itself. If you run a costs team and want to see what that looks like on real-world time entries, message me and I will show you. #CostsLaw #LegalTech #AICosts

AI Costs is not trying to be “one-click bill generation”. That is not the vision. The vision is more serious than that. Build drafting infrastructure that lets good people produce better output, with less waste, more consistency and tighter control. That means: controlled rewriting human review cleaner workflows better use of senior time less dependence on fatigue and brute force The future of costs drafting is not black-box automation. It is high-control augmentation. That is what we are building. #CostsLaw #LegalInnovation #AICosts

The best way to understand AI Costs is not through a polished demo. It is through your own drafting reality. Your own style. Your own shorthand. Your own messy entries. That is why the most useful demos are live walkthroughs on anonymised real-world material. No vague promises. No generic legal AI talk. Just: what the input looks like how the workflow behaves how much friction disappears where the human reviewer still takes control If you run a drafting team and want to see that properly, message me. A short walkthrough makes the point far better than a hundred buzzwords. #CostsDrafting #LegalTech #AICosts

The point of AI Costs is not to make someone type faster. It is to change what your most experienced people spend their time doing. A senior costs lawyer should be thinking about: structure proportionality exposure consistency recovery Not burning high-value time manually standardising line 842 of a bill. That is the commercial case for AI in costs. You do not buy it because typing is hard. You buy it because judgement is expensive, and it should be spent in the right place. #CostsLaw #LegalTech #AICosts

There is a quiet assumption in legal work that manual drafting is safer. It is not. Manual drafting drifts when people are tired. It varies across long bills. It creates inconsistency between fee earners, files and days. The risk is not only in automation. The risk is in repetition done by hand for too long. The safer model is not: "remove the human" It is: "remove the repetitive layer and keep the human reviewer fully in charge" That is a much stronger workflow. Especially in costs. #LegalOps #CostsLaw #AICosts

The real test for any drafting tool is not a clean sample. It is ugly shorthand from a live file. Things like: "tc cl re liab docs" "rev med recs and draft an" "email to expert re rpt and quantum" That is real life. That is what the draftsman actually gets. The gap between messy input and polished output is where so much time disappears in costs. AI Costs was built for that exact gap. Not perfect data. Not staged demos. Not ideal conditions. Messy, real-world entries that still need to become consistent, bill-ready language. That is the work. #CostsDrafting #LegalTech #AICosts