2X’s cover photo
2X

2X

Marketing Services

Malvern, Pennsylvania 32,409 followers

B2B Marketing-as-a-Service

About us

2X is the global leader in B2B marketing-as-a-service (MaaS), a subscription-based alternative to traditional B2B marketing delivery models. Offering AI-enabled B2B marketing talent and strategic consulting, 2X allows marketing leaders to accelerate growth in today’s resource-constrained environment and to deliver measurable results without increasing budgets. Founded in 2017 by three former CMOs from major global corporations, our mission at 2X is to improve marketing performance with powerful, data-driven campaigns that help businesses create more visibility, generate leads, and increase competitive advantage—twice as fast, and with double the impact. 2X is composed of world-class marketing strategists, developers, analysts, designers and writers who work together to build, run, and optimize marketing. Our company is growing fast, and we’re looking for the best talent to join our pioneering MaaS team. For more information, apply on our website 2X.marketing or contact us at ask@2X.marketing.

Website
https://2X.marketing/
Industry
Marketing Services
Company size
1,001-5,000 employees
Headquarters
Malvern, Pennsylvania
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2017
Specialties
Web Development, Data Transformation Programming , Branding , Email Marketing, Account Based Marketing, Digital Marketing, Marketing Operations, Lead Generation, Content Operations, Revenue Operations, Audience Based Advertising, Organic Social Media, and Community Engagement

Locations

  • Primary

    400 Lapp Rd

    Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355, US

    Get directions
  • Jalan Wan Kadir

    Taman Tun Dr Ismail, Kuala Lumpur 60000, MY

    Get directions
  • Ortigas Avenue

    Level 3, Silver City 3, Central Avenue

    Pasig, Metro Manila 1604, PH

    Get directions

Employees at 2X

Updates

  • 2X reposted this

    Why are some marketing teams agile… while others stay stuck? On the surface, many marketing organizations look similar. They have talented people. They run campaigns. They invest in technology. They’re under relentless pressure to do more with less. But the reality underneath can be very different. Some teams can shift quickly. They can reallocate budget. They can launch new initiatives fast. They can adapt as the market changes. Others cannot. Not because they lack effort. Not because they lack ideas. And not simply because they haven’t adopted enough AI. They struggle because too much of the function is locked up. Locked in headcount. Locked in multi-year tech contracts. Locked in rigid, never-ending workflows. Locked in operating models that were built for stability, not speed. That’s the real constraint. When most of the budget is tied up in fixed costs, agility becomes hard to achieve. You may see the need to pivot. You may know what the business needs next. But if the majority of your resources are already committed, flexibility is limited before the work even begins. That usually shows up like this: - New priorities take too long to launch - Teams are stretched over burned out, but still can’t shift fast enough - Budget is trapped in existing structure - There is constant tradeoff between capabilities and programs - Marketing stays reactive instead of becoming truly agile That is not just a resourcing issue. It is an operating model issue. The teams that become more agile tend to do three things differently: 1️⃣ They reduce what is locked in fixed structure They stop assuming every capability has to sit in-house. They create more room in the budget to flex as priorities change. That means less of the function is trapped in fixed costs, and more of it can be directed toward growth. 2️⃣ They build an intentional operating model They create clarity around what should be owned internally, what should be executed through partners, and what can be automated. So the function is designed to move, not just to manage work. 3️⃣ They increase budget flexibility over time As more execution becomes scalable and less of the budget is consumed by fixed overhead, the organization gains room to adapt. That is when agility becomes real. Not because the team is working harder. Because the model is no longer holding it back. Here’s what matters most: Marketing agility is not primarily a tool question. It is a structural question. If most of your budget and resources are locked into fixed costs, your ability to respond will always be constrained. If more of your model is flexible, orchestrated, and intentionally designed, you can move faster, shift with confidence, and invest where growth requires it. So the better question to ask is not: “How do we use more AI?” It is: How much of our marketing function is actually free to move? Because that is what determines whether marketing can truly be agile. #TheLimitlessCMO #B2B #CMO 2X

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for 2X

    32,409 followers

    This March, we recognize the women across 2X and the teams we partner with whose leadership and resilience continue to drive progress every day.   From visible milestones to the quieter shifts in between, growth is shaped by the choices, pressures, and moments that often go unseen. We celebrate the ever-evolving journey of every woman in our organization, and the seasons they navigate, grow through, and rise from. That perspective guides how we work. We meet teams where they are, support them through change, and stay focused on outcomes that move them forward.  We’re proud to keep building, evolving, and becoming in every season.    Happy International Women’s Month! 

  • 2X reposted this

    Are you owning the right work… or just doing everything yourself? This is one of those decisions that sounds simple, but quietly shapes everything. Your speed. Your costs. Your quality. Your impact. Your differentiation. And most teams don’t realize it’s a system problem. They decide reactively. “We need help. Let’s ask for more headcount” “We’re overwhelmed. Let's delay any work that won't impact this quarter.” “This feels strategically important. Let’s outsource it.” No clear logic. No consistent filter. Just decisions made in the moment. But the best teams don’t guess. They use a framework. Before deciding what to own, outsource, or automate, they pressure test the work across 5 dimensions: 1️⃣ Strategic Criticality Does this actually create differentiation? Or is it table stakes? If it shapes your competitive advantage, own it. 2️⃣ Proximity to Sales/Product Does this require tight, ongoing collaboration? Or can it live at a distance? If it needs constant alignment, keep it close. 3️⃣ Specialization Level Does this require deep expertise or niche skill sets? Or is it broadly understood? If it’s highly specialized, consider outsourcing. 4️⃣ Repeatability Is this a one-off effort? Or something you do over and over again? If it’s repeatable, standardize or automate. 5️⃣ Standardization Potential Can this be turned into a process? Or does it require judgment every time? If it’s predictable, automate it. When you zoom out, the pattern becomes clear: Own it → strategy, positioning, messaging, GTM decisions (the things that define you) Outsource it → execution, production, scaling best practices (the things others can do efficiently) Automate it → repeatable workflows, data, reporting (the things that shouldn’t need human effort) Most teams don’t struggle because they lack resources. They struggle because they misallocate them. They own too much. Outsource too late. Automate too little. But if you can get this right, and everything starts to click, you’ll get: Less pain Faster execution Lower costs Clearer focus Stronger differentiation So here’s the real question: What’s one thing your team is doing today that you probably shouldn’t be owning anymore? #TheLimitlessCMO #B2B #AI 2X

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for 2X

    32,409 followers

    Content engineering takes more than one team.  It requires coordination across product, content, SEO, ops, and analytics. Each plays a role in how your brand shows up and gets chosen. But someone still needs to own how it all comes together. Without clear ownership, it is hard to turn effort into something that compounds. Erin Strong explains why teams need a focused model with a clear point of ownership. If you are thinking about how to structure this, webinar 3 goes deeper on how to make it work.   Last chance to register: https://lnkd.in/gPAprWUk Can’t make it live? Sign up to get the recording.

  • 2X reposted this

    When Lisa Cole asked if I'd join a webinar talking about AI and processes, I assumed it was an invite to be in the audience (and I said "yes" immediately). When I found out she actually wanted me to talk about my experiences, I blushed harder than most grown adults should. I met Lisa Cole at a Gartner conference last year, and within about ten minutes I realized I was talking to someone who actually builds the things she talks about (that's rarer than it should be at the C-Suite level). She thinks in systems but also has this restless need to get her hands dirty inside the very systems she's advocating for. We've had a few conversations since then (not nearly enough), and every one of them has made me sharper. The fact that she asked me to speak at this event is genuinely one of the highlights of my year. I'm joining Lisa and Will Waugh from 2X for Session 3 of their AI visibility series: "From AI Adoption to AI Architecture: Stop Buying Tools. Start Building the System That Compounds." We're covering: → Why most AI initiatives stall after the experiment phase → The difference between tool adoption and system architecture → What the structural foundation actually looks like (not theory, actual workflows) → Why the gap between early movers and everyone else will be measurable in pipeline 18 months from now Tuesday, March 31 | 11:00 AM ET (9:00 AM MT for my fellow Albertans) Live attendees get an extended Q&A that won't be in the recording. I'll be there answering questions about the specific systems I've built, what worked, what didn't, and what I'd build first if I were starting from zero today. Link to register is in the comments! If our pre-call this morning is any indication of how interesting the recorded event will be, it's going to be an absolute blast -- and not nearly long enough 😂 #AIMarketing #B2BMarketing #SystemsLedGrowth #GTM #MarketingArchitecture #AEO #SaaS #PipesBeforeChocolate #MarketingOps #Webinar

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for 2X

    32,409 followers

    Here’s what you missed from our webinar on Tuesday:    • Content engineering pulls in multiple functions, not just one role  • It requires a mix of strategy, AI workflows, SEO, and storytelling  • Trying to consolidate all of that into one hire creates gaps in execution     And this is where teams start to feel it.      If you want to see how teams are actually structuring this in practice, webinar 3 goes deeper into what that looks like.     Register here: https://lnkd.in/gPAprWUk    Can’t make it live? Sign up to get the recording. 

  • View organization page for 2X

    32,409 followers

    AI visibility is not a one-time win.     In our first sessions, we covered how to diagnose your visibility gap and build the capability to show up in AI-driven discovery.     But showing up once doesn’t mean you’ll stay there.     Generative engines constantly reassess who they cite and recommend. Without reinforcement, competitors can replace you before the impact shows up in pipeline.     Join Lisa ColeWill Waugh, and Nathan Thompson on March 31 to learn how to monitor AI signal performance, reinforce your visibility, and protect your position over time.     Registration link in the comments. Can't make it live? We'll send you the recording after!

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • View organization page for 2X

    32,409 followers

    Happening tomorrow.     Many marketing teams are realizing that strong SEO performance doesn’t automatically translate into visibility in AI-generated answers.     In this session, Lisa Cole, Erin Strong, and Matilda Schieren will unpack what it actually takes to build content systems that generative engines can interpret, cite, and recommend.     You’ll leave with:   • A clearer understanding of why the Content Engineer role is a capability gap in disguise  • A disciplined system for turning content into a scalable engine, with clear ownership, orchestration, and structure • A practical path for building the capability without relying on a “unicorn” hire     Last chance to register: https://lnkd.in/gh3FR2pv

  • 2X reposted this

    For years, marketers created content to rank.     Now, buyers get answers from AI tools that summarize, compare and recommend vendors before they ever visit your site and browse your beautiful data reports.    That means clarity and structure matter more than ever. If your message isn’t easy for AI to interpret, you may not show up at all.     Next week, I’m joining Lisa Cole and M. Erin Strong to talk about why traditional SEO isn’t enough anymore and how to design content systems built for recommendation.     We’ll share what we’re seeing in the market and the practical shifts teams need to make now. Join us on March 24 at 11 AM ET. Registration here: https://lnkd.in/exP2F8Jq 

  • View organization page for 2X

    32,409 followers

    Missed Erin Strong and Will Waugh’s session this week?     One of the biggest takeaways? A lot of teams think they’re doing the right things to show up in AI search:  • Clean site  • Strong content  • Technical SEO dialed in    But authority is what actually gets you cited.     If you’re figuring out what to do next, webinars 2 and 3 go deeper into how to build that foundation.     Register in the comments.    Can’t make it live? Sign up to get the recording.

Similar pages

Browse jobs

Funding

2X 2 total rounds

Last Round

Series unknown
See more info on crunchbase