I believe the key is to create an environment where everyone feels their input is valued while keeping the discussion focused. One approach I find effective is setting clear objectives at the beginning of the meeting so participants understand the desired outcome. I prefer to actively listen and acknowledge different viewpoints, making sure no one dominates the conversation. Summarizing key takeaways periodically helps maintain clarity and prevent misunderstandings. If disagreements arise, I encourage participants to find common ground by focusing on shared goals rather than personal preferences.I believe the best decisions come from balancing diverse perspectives rather than forcing a single viewpoint.

Apart from the points mentioned here like Acknowledge all contributions, Summarize key points and Encourage compromise, I'll also: Highlight areas where viewpoints align, acknowledge differences without dismissing any viewpoint, summarize neutrally, guide towards a decision (use voting or prioritization if required) and share a written summary post-meeting to ensure alignment.

One thing I have found helpful was to have participants add their suggestions in the chat and copy these into a summary document before soliciting next steps.

A lot of times it comes down to reading the room and acting accordingly. If things get heated, ground the conversation: “We all want the same thing — a solution that works and moves us forward. Let’s figure out the best way to get there.” Its always: Us vs the Problem. Someone shares a concern, reflect it back: “Sounds like you’re saying this approach could create long-term challenges — is that right?” Always acknowledge and confirm. If opinions clash, find common ground: “Everyone agrees we need to move fast, but we also want to be thoughtful. So the real question is — what’s the right balance?” When ready to wrap it up: “Here’s what I’m hearing: [summarize]. Does anyone see it differently?” The more you practice the better you get.

1. Assign a “Devil’s Advocate” to Challenge Thinking Instead of seeking immediate agreement, designate someone to question assumptions and push back on prevailing ideas. 2. Start with Anonymous Input Before Discussion Before the meeting, collect insights anonymously through a shared document or survey. This ensures quieter voices are heard and allows you to structure the conversation around the most critical and diverse perspectives, rather than the loudest. 3. Use Decision Mapping to Make Complexity Visible Real-time visual mapping of viewpoints, trade-offs, and potential outcomes helps depersonalize disagreements and shift the focus to logic over emotion. It also provides a tangible way to track progress toward consensus.