- Considering the power struggle aspect of a shared database, it's always better to hold meetings to discuss needs and clarify misunderstandings. - Map the usage by identifying dependencies and assessing the database's critical roles. - Consider shared governance by implementing role-based access and assigning stewardship for data integrity and security. - Create agreements to formalize roles, dispute resolution processes, and long-term goals in a usage agreement. - Seek Mediation by using a neutral party to focus on shared objectives and reduce personal biases.

One thing I found helpful in navigating power struggles over shared databases is to clearly define ownership and access rights from the very beginning. To avoid shared databases power struggles, clearly define who owns the data and who has access to it. Grant only necessary access with the least possible permissions and regularly review these rights.

É importante garantir a segurança técnica e a equipe responsável por este banco de dados ser o guardiã do ponto de vista técnico e, a partir daí, buscar os Business Owner e os Keys Users como parte importante para a mediação e a chegada em consenso do banco de dados e sua segurança. Logo, ter a equipe diversificada e multiprofissional poderá ajudar a questão de conflito pela propriedade. Alinhar a visão técnica e de negócios.

Shared Databases are a common phenomenon and hence the power struggle: Let's understand the various possible scenarios: 1. Ownership should always be given to the one responsible for maintaining the databases i.e. one party doing read, write and maintaining access to data to other users 2. In case if there are two or more parties involved in maintaining the database,parts of database could be owned by stakeholders with one having admin rights 3. Multiple owners of databases could pose additional challenges like complicated data management, limited access to the right information, wrong information updated all of which could be resolved with transparent and informative discussion among the stakeholders 4. Human apsect could be an ego problem

Ownership of a shared database depends on several factors: contribution, purpose, and agreement. If one party developed, financed, or primarily maintains the database, they may hold a stronger claim. However, if the database was created collaboratively or its purpose serves multiple stakeholders equally, shared ownership or joint management might be appropriate. Consider pre-existing contracts, policies, or intellectual property laws to clarify rightful ownership. The resolution should align with fairness and the database's intended use, emphasizing collaboration over conflict. Legal counsel or a mediator could help negotiate an agreement that satisfies all parties while preserving the database’s utility and integrity.