If you work in the same office, meet him/her personally and try to converse. Seek his/her suggestions on how you can improve your code quality and adherence to the best practices of your company. If you work remotely, schedule a one-to-one call and have the same discussion. Written communications are never as effective as a one-to-one conversation. When we speak and listen, we get clarity and understand the other person better.

1. Politely ask for specific feedback on the rejected code. 2. Align your work with team standards and guidelines. 3. Request a code walkthrough or pair programming session for clarity. 4. Document feedback for future reference and improvement. 5. If issues persist, discuss the matter professionally with your manager.

We can: Seek Specific Feedback Ask for Clarification: Politely request detailed explanations for rejections, focusing on specific issues such as functionality, readability, or adherence to coding standards. Example-Based Questions: Ask for examples of acceptable code or suggestions for improvement to understand their expectations better. Non-Defensive Approach: Approach the feedback session with a learning mindset, demonstrating your willingness to improve. Suggest Collaborative Code Review Sessions Peer Reviews: Propose team-wide code review sessions where everyone can discuss and align on best practices.

To handle this effectively: 1. Ask for clarity: Politely request specific feedback on rejected code. 2. Understand standards: Clarify coding expectations and align accordingly. 3. Collaborate: Suggest pair programming to learn their approach. Focus on growth and teamwork.

Address this challenge by seeking constructive feedback in a one-on-one discussion. Ask the senior developer for specific reasons behind rejections and clarify expectations for acceptable code. Frame it as a learning opportunity to improve collaboration and code quality. Document coding standards together to ensure alignment moving forward.