First, it's important to analyse the requirement thoroughly before bringing it up for discussion, ensuring a clear understanding of why it was introduced. If it’s not feasible or the right approach, I’d figure out the key reasons. I’d also check with someone experienced who has dealt with similar situations to get their insights. Once the analysis is complete, scheduling a meeting with all relevant stakeholders, including the tech team, clearly explain the challenges, suggest alternative solutions, and set realistic timelines while keeping everyone updated regularly.

In technology projects, stakeholders often request features that may be unrealistic in terms of time, cost, or technical feasibility. To avoid misunderstandings and keep the project on track, it is essential to manage expectations with clarity and well-defined strategies. It is important to: Define the scope and limitations from the beginning, Actively listen and understand business needs, Demonstrate impact with data and examples, Offer alternative solutions, Involve stakeholders in informed decision-making.

1. Listen First: Understand the "why" behind the request—there’s always a reason. 2. Set Boundaries: Explain technical limits in simple, real-world terms. No jargon! 3. Offer Alternatives: Find a smarter, achievable way to meet their goal. 4. Show the Cost: Time, effort, and trade-offs—lay it all out transparently.

When stakeholders request unrealistic features, I manage expectations by setting clear boundaries while maintaining collaboration. First, I clarify project scope, technical constraints, and resource limitations upfront. I actively listen to understand their core needs and business goals. Instead of outright rejecting requests, I propose feasible alternatives that align with project capabilities. Data-driven insights help illustrate risks and trade-offs, ensuring transparency. Prioritization frameworks like MoSCoW or cost-benefit analysis guide discussions. By fostering open communication and aligning expectations early, I ensure a balanced approach that meets business objectives without compromising feasibility.

When stakeholders request unrealistic features, I first ensure clear communication regarding the project's scope and limitations. I actively listen to understand their core needs and then propose feasible alternatives that align with available resources. This helps maintain a balance between innovation and practicality while keeping stakeholders engaged in the process.